Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-25-2012, 10:53 AM
 
13,134 posts, read 40,610,038 times
Reputation: 12304

Advertisements

I'd like to hear peoples ''serious'' thoughts about just how did we evolve from the genus class of ape known as Australopithecus to become the different class of humans that have existed on this planet? Sorry i don't buy into either the ancient alien theory nor the bible creation myth as both of them are false by just the mtDNA Haplogroup science alone which shows that all humans (Sapiens) came from ''Mitochondria Eve'' some 180,000 BCE and not the ridiculous 6,000 to 8,000 years ago time frame that either those other two groups would want us to believe.

That being said i admit that i'm perplexed as to why any other intelligent mammal (other primates, elephants, dolphins, canines, felines etc.) didn't evolve into a ''human'' during the Pleistocene Epoch (2,588,000 BCE - 11,700 BCE) or at least into the intelligence that we humans have displayed over the thousands of years going back to when we were Australopithecus hominids?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-25-2012, 02:35 PM
 
Location: Jacksonville, FL
11,143 posts, read 10,704,481 times
Reputation: 9799
My own thought is that evolution was driven by opportunity and necessity. Our ancestors were in the right place concerning climate, ecology, etc. and there was something that forced evolution on them for survival.

A quick example would be color vision. If competition for ripe fruits was heavy, and most of the population was either monochromatic (totally color blind) or dichromatic (only able to see blues and greens), the rare individual who was trichromatic (could see red, blues, and greens) would have a huge advantage over the competition for gathering ripe fruits faster. This would lead to that individual being healthier and stronger than the competition, thus much more likely to mate and to pass on the trichromatic gene to their offspring.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2012, 11:05 AM
 
13,134 posts, read 40,610,038 times
Reputation: 12304
Thanks for posting JimRom ... and yeap i was pondering about if a diet change might had ''sparked'' the molecular dynamics that kicked evolution of humans into motion. One thought was that maybe evolution was slowly shedding the fur coating of these certain hominids to which over time allowed UVB radiation to penetrate the now bare skin and turn 7- Dehydrocholesterol into vitamin D and from research into vitamin D is that it seems to really be connected with a whole host of genetic and epigenetic changes in the human body.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2012, 11:11 AM
 
1,300 posts, read 959,607 times
Reputation: 2390
I think that sapience is very uncommon and requires the right neural architecture to happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2012, 11:16 AM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,184 posts, read 107,790,902 times
Reputation: 116077
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6 Foot 3 View Post
I'd like to hear peoples ''serious'' thoughts about just how did we evolve from the genus class of ape known as Australopithecus to become the different class of humans that have existed on this planet? Sorry i don't buy into either the ancient alien theory nor the bible creation myth as both of them are false by just the mtDNA Haplogroup science alone which shows that all humans (Sapiens) came from ''Mitochondria Eve'' some 180,000 BCE and not the ridiculous 6,000 to 8,000 years ago time frame that either those other two groups would want us to believe.

That being said i admit that i'm perplexed as to why any other intelligent mammal (other primates, elephants, dolphins, canines, felines etc.) didn't evolve into a ''human'' during the Pleistocene Epoch (2,588,000 BCE - 11,700 BCE) or at least into the intelligence that we humans have displayed over the thousands of years going back to when we were Australopithecus hominids?
We don't have a clear idea how intelligent cetaceans are. Specialists say they're highly intelligent and empathic. Empathy is a "human" trait.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2012, 08:30 AM
 
13,134 posts, read 40,610,038 times
Reputation: 12304
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruth4Truth View Post
We don't have a clear idea how intelligent cetaceans are. Specialists say they're highly intelligent and empathic. Empathy is a "human" trait.
Yeap i'm thinking that i've read somewhere before about how dolphins can count (?) and i wondering if we've aquired empathy even back to when we were hominids (animals) as it seems to be a mammalian trait as for example ''mothers'' caring for their young.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2012, 08:22 PM
 
Location: On the Edge of the Fringe
7,593 posts, read 6,080,049 times
Reputation: 7029
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6 Foot 3 View Post
Yeap i'm thinking that i've read somewhere before about how dolphins can count (?) and i wondering if we've aquired empathy even back to when we were hominids (animals) as it seems to be a mammalian trait as for example ''mothers'' caring for their young.
Empathy is a great species survival tool. It allows for mothers to care for their young and a tribe to assist each other
what is fascinating is H Neanderthal evolution...from the time they appeared on the planet, they never evolved beyond the technology of simple tool use. H sapiens went from a stone age to exploring Space so far, because of neurons and a highly developed brain. We do not have a well preserved Neanderthal brain to study (although I have met some people who appear to be quite close)
I would suggest that over a period of time, having a few more neurons in the brain of one Australiopithicans to another became a desirable trait, not on a conscious level as we think of it but do to an ability to react faster and thus breed more effectively, therefore increasing the "IQ" for lack of a better term within the species.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-28-2012, 10:33 AM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,184 posts, read 107,790,902 times
Reputation: 116077
So it was about more neurons, rather than brain size? Because the Cro-magnons had larger brains that we do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-28-2012, 07:56 PM
 
Location: Texas
5,068 posts, read 10,128,114 times
Reputation: 1651
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6 Foot 3 View Post
Yeap i'm thinking that i've read somewhere before about how dolphins can count (?) and i wondering if we've aquired empathy even back to when we were hominids (animals) as it seems to be a mammalian trait as for example ''mothers'' caring for their young.
I do know that chimps have excellent memories according to tests done.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-28-2012, 07:58 PM
 
Location: Texas
5,068 posts, read 10,128,114 times
Reputation: 1651
Quote:
Originally Posted by LargeKingCat View Post
Empathy is a great species survival tool. It allows for mothers to care for their young and a tribe to assist each other
what is fascinating is H Neanderthal evolution...from the time they appeared on the planet, they never evolved beyond the technology of simple tool use. H sapiens went from a stone age to exploring Space so far, because of neurons and a highly developed brain. We do not have a well preserved Neanderthal brain to study (although I have met some people who appear to be quite close)
I would suggest that over a period of time, having a few more neurons in the brain of one Australiopithicans to another became a desirable trait, not on a conscious level as we think of it but do to an ability to react faster and thus breed more effectively, therefore increasing the "IQ" for lack of a better term within the species.
I seem to remember a recent article where Neanderthals had a "factory" going, making sharp tools.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top