Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-10-2013, 03:23 PM
 
15,912 posts, read 20,189,698 times
Reputation: 7693

Advertisements

Interesting reading.....

Quote:
"Beyond treating individual letters as physical objects, the human brain may also perceive a text in its entirety as a kind of physical landscape. When we read, we construct a mental representation of the text in which meaning is anchored to structure. The exact nature of such representations remains unclear, but they are likely similar to the mental maps we create of terrain—such as mountains and trails—and of man-made physical spaces, such as apartments and offices.
No Tech Magazine: Why the Brain Prefers to Read on Paper
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-10-2013, 07:25 PM
 
Location: God's Gift to Mankind for flying anything
5,921 posts, read 13,848,998 times
Reputation: 5229
I guess the title of the magazine the article appears in explains all ... No Tech ...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2013, 08:19 PM
 
15,912 posts, read 20,189,698 times
Reputation: 7693
Quote:
Originally Posted by irman View Post
I guess the title of the magazine the article appears in explains all ... No Tech ...
I guess you didn't bother to read the article, it's an excerpt from Scientific American ~duh~

The Reading Brain in the Digital Age: The Science of Paper versus Screens: Scientific American
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2013, 08:25 PM
 
Location: Location: Location
6,727 posts, read 9,946,672 times
Reputation: 20483
I do agree that in some applications, reading from an actual book is important to be able to backtrack to a previous page. For myself, when studying a play script, I can actually envision the page - left or right - where the dialog appeared and I find it far easier to retain the speech.

However, the fallacy is in the statement that the brain prefers to read on paper. I was given an original script, typed on standard size sheets - 8 1/2 x 11 inches - and the effort to learn my own speeches, never mind the speeches from which I received my cues, was incredibly difficult by comparison.

From this, I conclude that it is not simply the act of reading on paper, but the construct of the printing that matters, i.e., recto and verso.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2013, 09:41 AM
 
1,102 posts, read 1,859,776 times
Reputation: 1140
Thanks for this. Gives me a little more insight on why I feel the need to print out a 100 page doc even though I'm very tied to my e-gadgets
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2013, 11:45 PM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,928,948 times
Reputation: 36644
It might just be a very ephemeral preference that has barely lingered through a generation. The first non-paper reading took place on heavy computer monitors, that required sitting in an uncomfortable chair with a fixed posture in order to read a lengthy document that can more easily be enjoyed in one's lap in an easy chair. So over the space of a decade or two, people acquired a personal preference to read paper over monitor. This preference might go away, with the universality (not yet attained, by the way) of electronic screen reading that enables the reader to retire to an easy chair.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2013, 01:32 AM
 
2,401 posts, read 3,255,451 times
Reputation: 1837
"In most cases, paper books have more obvious topography than onscreen text. An open paperback presents a reader with two clearly defined domains—the left and right pages—and a total of eight corners with which to orient oneself. A reader can focus on a single page of a paper book without losing sight of the whole text: one can see where the book begins and ends and where one page is in relation to those borders. One can even feel the thickness of the pages read in one hand and pages to be read in the other. Turning the pages of a paper book is like leaving one footprint after another on the trail—there's a rhythm to it and a visible record of how far one has traveled. All these features not only make text in a paper book easily navigable, they also make it easier to form a coherent mental map of the text."

Agreed completely. When I try to recall information from a book I find myself frequently recalling the physical feel of the page, specifically flipping to and from the page, and the way the letters look on the page.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2013, 08:20 PM
 
500 posts, read 571,364 times
Reputation: 691
Maybe I'm unusual but I've always preferred reading on an LCD screen over paper. I did not like the CRT displays though because the edges always seemed a little blurry. But I will take a high resolution screen over any paper medium. Paper books always seem to want to close up so you're always having to hold the pages apart. I like having my hands free and reading on a laptop or kindle. You also have to use bookmarks that get lost to hold your place. And newspapers? I have bad memories of them getting ink everywhere. After you're done with them, they pile up. Much happier reading stuff on a high res display.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2013, 09:38 AM
 
13,511 posts, read 19,270,967 times
Reputation: 16580
I totally believe that it's easier to read on paper, easier on the mind and eyes as well...I can understand "why the brain prefers to read on paper".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2013, 12:11 PM
 
Location: Sierra Nevada Land, CA
9,455 posts, read 12,538,654 times
Reputation: 16453
I agree about the paper thing. When I produce documents at work, my final proof read is on paper. It is amazing how many mistakes (minor) I catch on paper that I did not see on the monitor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:48 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top