U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
 
Old 01-01-2014, 10:27 AM
 
Location: Vegas
1,790 posts, read 877,398 times
Reputation: 1718

Advertisements

By Neuroskeptic | December 31, 2013

Lately, there have been increasing numbers of online, unofficial – what might be called vigilante – investigations into published scientific work.


vigilance

The blog Retraction Watch and its comment section are a good example of this. Commenters, often anonymous, will get onto the trail of a certain researcher (generally following a retraction) and scrutinize their publications (e.g. here) looking for plagiarism, image manipulation, statistically improbable data, or other evidence of bad practice.

At last, people are beginning to question “scientific findings” to determine whether or not they're politically motivated or actually good science. This article has lots of links and is well-worth reading @ Science Needs Vigilantes - Neuroskeptic | DiscoverMagazine.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-01-2014, 01:31 PM
 
Location: Somewhere in northern Alabama
12,021 posts, read 29,001,496 times
Reputation: 15145
There is another site that does something similar with plagiarized photos and photographers. I've been doing the fact-checking routine for years and exposing excesses in climate change arguments, asbestos fears, and a host of other issues. Teaching people to question is important.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2014, 03:23 PM
 
Location: Sarasota, FL
1,369 posts, read 719,582 times
Reputation: 718
My day job is fact checking physics papers submitted to us for review and/or publication. Since most is math-related, there's not a such thing as plagiarism as it's math. Unless you want to re-write how 2+2=4.

Politically motivated science is a unique topic. One paper may be motivated by an organization. But one paper doesnt mean anything, it's continued research and experimental validation that actually matter. One paper may raise a few eyebrows, and simply put it on the radar for others to validate.

Now this is for physics mind you......... From the scale of Cosmology to the Quantum side. I dont see papers where people are trying to say that Sugar is good for you because of reasons a, b, or c. I would fathom that this would be a bigger problem in the other areas of science where human well being, climate change, things like that are much easier to fudge than e=mc2.

Ben
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2014, 09:29 AM
 
Location: Vegas
1,790 posts, read 877,398 times
Reputation: 1718
I wonder just how many people even think to question a "scientific conclusion"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2014, 02:41 PM
 
Location: Sarasota, FL
1,369 posts, read 719,582 times
Reputation: 718
Quote:
Originally Posted by sargentodiaz View Post
I wonder just how many people even think to question a "scientific conclusion"?
Every scientist I know does. Its the public that usually doesnt. :-)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2014, 09:24 PM
 
Location: Limbo
5,174 posts, read 2,874,904 times
Reputation: 4806
Quote:
Originally Posted by sargentodiaz View Post
I wonder just how many people even think to question a "scientific conclusion"?
The people assume their conclusion is accurate because they know more than the people. Well, we assume that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $89,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:37 AM.

© 2005-2015, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 - Top