Can you get cancer from smoke detectors? (format, devices, system)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Smoke detectors contain Americium-241 in tiny doses (0.9 microcuries). I've heard that they are mostly inert when held on the skin and the alpha/beta/gamma radiation is not readily absorbed however if you were to inhale 50 ground pellets of americium, what would happen?
"NUREG-1717 evaluated several scenarios: (1) a residential fire involving two smoke detectors, (2) a transportation fire involving a typical shipment of 7,200 smoke detectors, and (3) a manufacturer's warehouse fire involving 36,000 smoke detectors (which was also used to assess the potential health effects if these devices were used as a radioactive dispersal device). Even in the latter case, for a firefighter wearing a respirator at this warehouse fire, the individual dose from 36,000 smoke detectors was estimated to be about 3 microGray (still a fraction of what we receive daily from natural background radiation). Remember we each receive about 10 microSv per day of natural environmental background radiation, an extremely low amount relative to the natural environmental radiation around us."
I think you'd be fine. Or turn into a werewolf. Depends on the phase of the moon I guess.
Smoke detectors contain Americium-241 in tiny doses (0.9 microcuries). I've heard that they are mostly inert when held on the skin and the alpha/beta/gamma radiation is not readily absorbed however if you were to inhale 50 ground pellets of americium, what would happen?
Are you talking about rubbing dozens of smoke detectors on your skin?
As to what would happen, why don't you try it and get back to us? LOL
This. Radon should be more of a concern. One of our neighbors was VERY high and had to install a remediation system. We’ve had ours checked twice by two different companies and our levels are negligible but our home did have a passive radon remediation system installed when it was built, probably because the foundation sits in a pocket of rock they had to blast out so they figured it was a smart precaution I guess.
This. Radon should be more of a concern. One of our neighbors was VERY high and had to install a remediation system. We’ve had ours checked twice by two different companies and our levels are negligible but our home did have a passive radon remediation system installed when it was built, probably because the foundation sits in a pocket of rock they had to blast out so they figured it was a smart precaution I guess.
Curious - how high was the level?
I put in a remediation system as my level was just above the EPA level of 4.0, but that was more for piece of mind than any worry about cancer.
One was 400+ just down the road. The guy doing the work said the highest he had seen was a house about 15 miles away that read 1,200+.
400 pCi/L (where 4 is the EPA action level)?
Or 400 Bq/m3 which is a bit more than 10 pCi/L?
If it's in pCi/L that's insane.
** Edit ** I looked it up and there are areas with 600, 800, more. Wow.
In retrospect the difference between 4 and say 3 is miniscule.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.