U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 01-11-2009, 02:05 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Downey CA
128 posts, read 47,624 times
Reputation: 43
EDDIEISTAZ is on a distinguished road
Default how long before we reach the moon again any predictions

I am seeing nowadays more and more flights by nasa how long in you peoples mind will it take them to setup a lab in mars and how long will it be before we send anothere maned ship to the moon?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-11-2009, 10:18 PM
m. Sons of the Republic of Texas
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Juan Seguin, Texas
2,542 posts, read 1,651,909 times
Reputation: 991
gy2020 is a splendid one to beholdgy2020 is a splendid one to beholdgy2020 is a splendid one to beholdgy2020 is a splendid one to beholdgy2020 is a splendid one to beholdgy2020 is a splendid one to beholdgy2020 is a splendid one to beholdgy2020 is a splendid one to beholdgy2020 is a splendid one to beholdgy2020 is a splendid one to beholdgy2020 is a splendid one to beholdgy2020 is a splendid one to beholdgy2020 is a splendid one to beholdgy2020 is a splendid one to beholdgy2020 is a splendid one to beholdgy2020 is a splendid one to behold
It's all up to Pres-Elect Obama. If he supports NASA then Moon by 2020 and Mars by 2030. If he decides to cut NASA budget then push back the numbers 10-20 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2009, 01:27 AM
Architecture Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Northglenn, Colorado
3,700 posts, read 2,074,488 times
Reputation: 777
Noahma is a splendid one to beholdNoahma is a splendid one to beholdNoahma is a splendid one to beholdNoahma is a splendid one to beholdNoahma is a splendid one to beholdNoahma is a splendid one to beholdNoahma is a splendid one to beholdNoahma is a splendid one to beholdNoahma is a splendid one to beholdNoahma is a splendid one to beholdNoahma is a splendid one to beholdNoahma is a splendid one to beholdNoahma is a splendid one to beholdNoahma is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by gy2020 View Post
It's all up to Pres-Elect Obama. If he supports NASA then Moon by 2020 and Mars by 2030. If he decides to cut NASA budget then push back the numbers 10-20 years.
the last article I read, he had thoughts about moving NASA into the military. I think that would significantly increase the funding?
He is still pushing for the deadline to the moon and beyond set by Bush
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2009, 05:52 AM
lost in space
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Portland, ME.
3,700 posts, read 2,724,508 times
Reputation: 1306
K-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud of
Moderator cut: orphaned

Now as for the moon, fairly soon. The technology and know-how are already in place so it would be more of a matter of selecting the mission and training the teams.

Last edited by Bowie; 02-01-2009 at 12:33 PM.. Reason: I fixed the typo in the title, so the reference is orphaned.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2009, 06:17 PM
m. Sons of the Republic of Texas
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Juan Seguin, Texas
2,542 posts, read 1,651,909 times
Reputation: 991
gy2020 is a splendid one to beholdgy2020 is a splendid one to beholdgy2020 is a splendid one to beholdgy2020 is a splendid one to beholdgy2020 is a splendid one to beholdgy2020 is a splendid one to beholdgy2020 is a splendid one to beholdgy2020 is a splendid one to beholdgy2020 is a splendid one to beholdgy2020 is a splendid one to beholdgy2020 is a splendid one to beholdgy2020 is a splendid one to beholdgy2020 is a splendid one to beholdgy2020 is a splendid one to beholdgy2020 is a splendid one to beholdgy2020 is a splendid one to behold
lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2009, 07:38 PM
Mortgage Banker & Broker
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cary, NC
1,036 posts, read 884,273 times
Reputation: 405
rcarrillo is just really nicercarrillo is just really nicercarrillo is just really nicercarrillo is just really nicercarrillo is just really nicercarrillo is just really nicercarrillo is just really nicercarrillo is just really nicercarrillo is just really nice
I just read that Obama was briefed by the dissenters over at NASA that want an alternative to the Ares/Constellation program. They still want the Orion crew capsule to go to space, the moon and mars... but they propose a slightly different launch system.

One that borrowers more from the current shuttle rockets and so would be cheaper/faster to develop than building a new rocket and testing it. There are benefits to both approachs, but with the budget shortfall and coming gap in US ability to launch manned missions, cheaper/faster might be better than a whole new system.

I think the chances of Geroge the 2nds return to Moon/vogage to Mars plans working are about as likely as Geroge the 1sts plans to get us to Mars. Bold statements and trying to capture Kennedy, but with a weak follow through and little popular and political support. Its sad that we first went to the moon in 1969.... its going to be 40 years soon and we have taken "one giant leap for mankind" backwards in space exploration since then.

Vastly superior technology but the US has lost the interest and sense of adventure to make the trip. If Columbus, Lewis and Clark and other explorers were around today, they would never make it out the door with paperwork, risk analysis and budget cutbacks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2009, 09:30 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
2,816 posts, read 1,694,353 times
Reputation: 1351
BLAZER PROPHET has much to be proud ofBLAZER PROPHET has much to be proud ofBLAZER PROPHET has much to be proud ofBLAZER PROPHET has much to be proud ofBLAZER PROPHET has much to be proud ofBLAZER PROPHET has much to be proud ofBLAZER PROPHET has much to be proud ofBLAZER PROPHET has much to be proud ofBLAZER PROPHET has much to be proud ofBLAZER PROPHET has much to be proud ofBLAZER PROPHET has much to be proud ofBLAZER PROPHET has much to be proud ofBLAZER PROPHET has much to be proud ofBLAZER PROPHET has much to be proud ofBLAZER PROPHET has much to be proud ofBLAZER PROPHET has much to be proud ofBLAZER PROPHET has much to be proud ofBLAZER PROPHET has much to be proud ofBLAZER PROPHET has much to be proud ofBLAZER PROPHET has much to be proud of
The moon? Been there, done that, bought the moon rock.

We have no justification on spending hundreds of millions of dollars to see some guy hop around on the moon. It has little bearing to making our lives any better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2009, 09:37 AM
Thank goodness I'm a country girl.
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SW Missouri
3,294 posts, read 1,455,722 times
Reputation: 2656
20yrsinBranson has a reputation beyond repute
20yrsinBranson has a reputation beyond repute20yrsinBranson has a reputation beyond repute20yrsinBranson has a reputation beyond repute20yrsinBranson has a reputation beyond repute20yrsinBranson has a reputation beyond repute20yrsinBranson has a reputation beyond repute20yrsinBranson has a reputation beyond repute20yrsinBranson has a reputation beyond repute20yrsinBranson has a reputation beyond repute20yrsinBranson has a reputation beyond repute20yrsinBranson has a reputation beyond repute20yrsinBranson has a reputation beyond repute20yrsinBranson has a reputation beyond repute20yrsinBranson has a reputation beyond repute20yrsinBranson has a reputation beyond repute
Well, as a dyed in the wool conspiracy theorist, I would say that using the term "again" is being optimistic at best.

Personally, I have two very conflicting and pardoxical thoughts about this. The first being; we never went to the moon in the first place. and secondly; we went to the moon but there were aliens there who told us to get off and never come back.

LOL I would say that there are more important things to spend billions of dollars on and hopefully the new administration will agree.

20yrsinBranson


Quote:
Originally Posted by EDDIEISTAZ View Post
I am seeing nowadays more and more flights by nasa how long in you peoples mind will it take them to setup a lab in mars and how long will it be before we send anothere maned ship to the moon?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2009, 10:11 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: DENVER
1,084 posts, read 795,697 times
Reputation: 529
el borracho is a glorious beacon of lightel borracho is a glorious beacon of lightel borracho is a glorious beacon of lightel borracho is a glorious beacon of lightel borracho is a glorious beacon of lightel borracho is a glorious beacon of lightel borracho is a glorious beacon of lightel borracho is a glorious beacon of lightel borracho is a glorious beacon of lightel borracho is a glorious beacon of light
too long NASA is 20-30 years behind ,stop and think for a minute we landed on the moon in 69 and nothing has really happend since we last left the moon
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2009, 01:45 PM
lost in space
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Portland, ME.
3,700 posts, read 2,724,508 times
Reputation: 1306
K-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud ofK-Luv has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by el borracho View Post
too long NASA is 20-30 years behind ,stop and think for a minute we landed on the moon in 69 and nothing has really happend since we last left the moon
It took what, ten years to go from nothing, nada, zilch to landing a few people on the Moon and than bringing them back. That is quite the accomplishment. I don't care if it has been 100 years since we last went to the Moon; that know-how, technology, and all around brain power did not go anywhere. Just because we haven't been back does not mean that we forgot how to.

We went to the Moon because Russia 'threatened' to do the same. It was a political statement as much as anything else that the Moon mission stood for. Now that other countries are developing space programs (some with the intentions of reaching the Moon) the US is once again getting the itch.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:52 PM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top