|

02-25-2009, 10:23 PM
|
|
A Crazy for babes Dude!
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Tampa
3,091 posts, read 2,269,596 times
Reputation: 544
|
|
They keep changing the science on me!!!
For ex, did you know there are now
5 oceans?
8 planets?
4 states of matter?
argh!!! 
|
|

02-26-2009, 03:03 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Arizona
2,023 posts, read 1,299,246 times
Reputation: 502
|
|
Can you imagine what awaits when a new energy source is discovered? or traveling speed of light is possible? Don't get mad, get glade! 
|
|

02-26-2009, 05:26 AM
|
|
Just born to be silly!!
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Pinellas Park, FL
634 posts, read 245,507 times
Reputation: 186
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by crystalblue
For ex, did you know there are now
5 oceans?
8 planets?
4 states of matter?
argh!!! 
|
Yup, that's why you can't always rely on it.
|
|

02-26-2009, 06:50 AM
|
|
lost in space
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Portland, ME.
3,739 posts, read 2,853,295 times
Reputation: 1323
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by crystalblue
For ex, did you know there are now
5 oceans?
8 planets?
4 states of matter?
argh!!! 
|
The fifth ocean, the Antarctic Ocean AKA the Southern Ocean has always been debated. Nothing new with that.
So what, a few astronomers changed the qualifications for what now constitutes a planet. Big whoop dee do. Considering how small Pluto is and its distance from the Sun I would say that they made the right decision. There are many large asteroids that orbit the Sun, a few that are roundish in shape. Should we call these planets, too?
There are actually more than four states of matter if you want to get picky. Water alone can exist as thirteen separate solid states.
|
|

02-26-2009, 10:43 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Somewhere in northern Alabama
3,948 posts, read 3,255,136 times
Reputation: 3008
|
|
|
Plasma as a state of matter has been accepted around the scientific community for years. We were doing projects on it in H.S. back in the 1960s. The oceans thing has always been a joke, merely a convenient naming convention. The same with europe. Europe isn't a continent, any more than Florida.
|
|

03-09-2009, 07:49 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Texas
48 posts, read 18,912 times
Reputation: 36
|
|
|
It's good that it keeps changing. That means progress. It means science will change according any new evidence found without throwing a fit. I would say that's what makes it reliable.
|
|

03-09-2009, 08:31 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
1,145 posts, read 568,412 times
Reputation: 284
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by K-Luv
So what, a few astronomers changed the qualifications for what now constitutes a planet. Big whoop dee do. Considering how small Pluto is and its distance from the Sun I would say that they made the right decision. There are many large asteroids that orbit the Sun, a few that are roundish in shape. Should we call these planets, too?
|
There are several round Pluto-sized objects in the solar system.I think there was some talk about calling these objects Plutoids, but are now called dwarf planets. Like Pluto, Ceres is a roundish dwarf planet but is located in the Asteroid Belt between Mars and Jupiter and appears it may be the only dwarf planet in the Asteroid Belt.
Eris is another dwarf planet, but it's located beyond the Kuiper Belt and is about 3 times farther from the Sun than Pluto. Eris is larger than Pluto.
Within the Asteroid Belt, most of the asteroids appear to be more like fragments that are either broken pieces or just didn't bind together to form planets or dwarf planets. So except for Ceres, asteroids wouldn't be called planets or dwarf planets.
|
|

03-09-2009, 09:06 PM
|
|
A Crazy for babes Dude!
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Tampa
3,091 posts, read 2,269,596 times
Reputation: 544
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sndillon
It's good that it keeps changing. That means progress. It means science will change according any new evidence found without throwing a fit. I would say that's what makes it reliable.
|
I dont have a prob with new science, but they should announce it or something!
|
|

03-10-2009, 08:21 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
312 posts, read 166,945 times
Reputation: 102
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by crystalblue
I dont have a prob with new science, but they should announce it or something!
|
The majority of people simply don't care, so announcing it on the 10:00 local news isn't going to do much for ratings.
For the few that DO care, there is this little thing called the internet with loads of reliable science news sites  .
Join Reddit (and pick science categories), or regularly check Physorg, New Scientist, Discovery.com, and many other too numerous sites to name. They regularly have science news, discoveries and so on.
|
|

03-10-2009, 12:35 PM
|
|
A Crazy for babes Dude!
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Tampa
3,091 posts, read 2,269,596 times
Reputation: 544
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpgtfc
The majority of people simply don't care, so announcing it on the 10:00 local news isn't going to do much for ratings.
For the few that DO care, there is this little thing called the internet with loads of reliable science news sites  .
Join Reddit (and pick science categories), or regularly check Physorg, New Scientist, Discovery.com, and many other too numerous sites to name. They regularly have science news, discoveries and so on.
|
think I am going to have to. Hate getting blindsided by missing planets and stuff.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|