With test tube baby technology, will human mating be obsolete or even illegal? (connection, light)

[Rance]

I'm beginning to think, it might very well be a good thing he doesn't "breed". You are so far out there NAH...there is no turning back! You've brain washed yourself with these rediculous books by authors that could'nt get laid.

If you do not allow the penis to rest, then the muscle tissue does not get enough oxygen. The individual gets prolonged erections, the muscle becomes so engorged, it's painful. Pressure inside starts to increase. More pressure and less blood flow. Eventually...

Yeah...I hate when that happens

[Ronzou]

HAHA! I KNOW! What's wrong with a prolonged hard on! Prolonged... Hard on... LOL! Anyways.

What's wrong with that? It just means you can stay in the game longer! This must be why I'm going to die from brain bleeding. At least I'll go out in style! I'd want to see the faces on the people reading that obituary! LOL!

[bmurphy]

So NAH thinks having sex means the penis never rests? Uh, it's not like we're having sex 24/7.

NAH - get a life...

[joee]

Ronzou, if we die from that does that mean the casket lid wouldn't shut

[Ronzou]

Originally Posted by joee

Ronzou, if we die from that does that mean the casket lid wouldn't shut

That would be an awesome way to be remembered!

Not even in death will it stop him from having raging boners.

Oh yeah and the epitaph would be something like...


"Rock on with a hard on"

RIP

[Jammie]

Originally Posted by Cosmic

Ok the big question is what should mate with what?

If you take all openings, orifices, or anything that looks like a hole, then add up anything that is phallus like and run all the possible permutations you can described the potential sinning available to humans.

But what about other creatures. They possibly could go inter-species. And mating is the correct phrase.





Here is a lil rodent keeping it in the family





Going Inter but that dog is feeling Humiliation, is it because he is a he???





When in doubt just limit it to blowjobs.





Who cares about VD when you know a doc like this guy.






All this talk about mating has generated enough heat that my computer was acting up. Did a tear down this morning, found the problem.

Wow Cosmic, you're really cute. And you got your puter running just fine.

OK so now I have a question~if test tube babies are in the future, will the ones with visual abnormalities be thrown away? At what point would that be considered murder? Would a couple go in and put an order in for a baby and wait nine months or would it be more like shopping at a store and picking one out? Just exactly how would placement work?

[Need_affordable_home]

Originally Posted by Jammie

Wow Cosmic, you're really cute. And you got your puter running just fine.

OK so now I have a question~if test tube babies are in the future, will the ones with visual abnormalities be thrown away? At what point would that be considered murder? Would a couple go in and put an order in for a baby and wait nine months or would it be more like shopping at a store and picking one out? Just exactly how would placement work?

I think you can "abort" a test tube baby and theres no risk to the mother. They probably will be aborted early on if they are found to have physical and/or gene defects. I can see the future happening with "perfect" humans that have no major handicaps. I would rather never be born than be born with a major disability to be honest. Actually I would not even know if I was "aborted" in my past life so it wouldnt matter. You raise a very good political question. I suppose if the test tube baby is like 7, 8, 9 months and ready to be "born" you cant abort at this point but theres always adoption if you are not willing to raise a child with major handicaps like deafness, blindness, paralized, deformed, retarded, etc. I wonder whos gonna adopt? Maybe someone that cant afford to pay the steep price for a test tube baby? Maybe all the adopted babies will be raised in a nursing home and released once they are old enough to get a job and support themselves?

To everyone who doesnt believe in abstinence, thats sad that you would harm yourself. Please seek help for this self destructive behavior

[bmurphy]

Originally Posted by Need_affordable_home

To everyone who doesnt believe in abstinence, thats sad that you would harm yourself. Please seek help for this self destructive behavior

Considering NOBODY agrees with you, maybe you're the one who needs help?

[Need_affordable_home]

Originally Posted by bmurphy

Considering NOBODY agrees with you, maybe you're the one who needs help?

Yes I need help explaining to others the true risks of recreational mating. Seems that not everyone listens to what they dont want to hear. One guy even said he doesnt care if he dies from mating as long as theres a smile on his face.

I can not "save" those people, they have to "save" themselves. I choose not to risk my health with risky recreational mating behavior. Frankly even if mating were 100% safe, I lack the interest in the first place. Someone would need to have a very high libido to be willing to mate in the face of grave health risks and they are too horny to stop and think about the consequences

[windflower]

Originally Posted by Need_affordable_home

I think you can "abort" a test tube baby and theres no risk to the mother. They probably will be aborted early on if they are found to have physical and/or gene defects. I can see the future happening with "perfect" humans that have no major handicaps.... I suppose if the test tube baby is like 7, 8, 9 months and ready to be "born" you cant abort at this point but theres always adoption if you are not willing to raise a child with major handicaps like deafness, blindness, paralized, deformed, retarded, etc. I wonder whos gonna adopt? Maybe someone that cant afford to pay the steep price for a test tube baby? Maybe all the adopted babies will be raised in a nursing home and released once they are old enough to get a job and support themselves?
(

Need_Affordable_Home…. I sincerely hope you are not serious in this post of yours.

Do you even SEE how you are describing a human being here?? In the same terms that one would describe a piece of furniture or a pet for sale: "Let's mark down this sofa by 50% because no one will buy it with that defective frame." "This puppy is not really show quality, so we are selling it at a discount." What you are proposing is some sort of "Bob's Discount Babies" …. the very notion is stomach-turning.

Is your true opinion of the human race that only the perfect should survive? I thought we'd left that sort of thinking behind with the Third Reich.

It seems you view other human beings as nothing more than animals, to which you – with your enlightened ideas -- are superior. I'm sure this concept is behind your insistence on using the word "mating", but you now speak of "releasing" these supposed not-quite-perfect test-tube babies into society. "Releasing"??!! We release caged animals. We release jailed prisoners. Would you consider a less-than-physically-perfect human being to be nothing more than a zoo animal or a criminal?

The ideas you express in your post are some of the most offensive that I have read in a long time.