U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Washington > Seattle area
 [Register]
Seattle area Seattle and King County Suburbs
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply
 
Unread 07-31-2010, 09:29 AM
 
Location: Seattle area, via Bay Area and Phoenix
1,486 posts, read 3,272,464 times
Reputation: 509
Default Target is coming to downtown Seattle

Target buys space for retail store downtown | Seattle Times

As someone who works downtown, I'm glad to see it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Unread 07-31-2010, 10:32 AM
 
8 posts, read 6,561 times
Reputation: 14
Target is almost as bad as Wal-Mart, IMO. I'm really sorry to hear this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-01-2010, 12:13 AM
 
343 posts, read 635,258 times
Reputation: 159
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wet Dog View Post
Target is almost as bad as Wal-Mart, IMO. I'm really sorry to hear this.
Would you prefer a big empty building? Because those are the options. Like I always say, a bustling downtown is a happy downtown.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-01-2010, 01:00 AM
 
76 posts, read 96,111 times
Reputation: 27
I prefer a happy/bustling downtown. I just don't want to see smaller shops shut down due to competition.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-01-2010, 01:34 AM
 
Location: Seattle
808 posts, read 1,025,596 times
Reputation: 394
In this case, I think it will not be a problem. It might actually act as a magnet to keep people browsing in the area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-01-2010, 04:26 PM
 
Location: South Georgia
8,399 posts, read 5,605,834 times
Reputation: 4563
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wet Dog View Post
Target is almost as bad as Wal-Mart, IMO. I'm really sorry to hear this.
I agree. THe less diversity and shopping choices you have, the better.

I think one store in the USA, preferably in Wisconsin should suffice. Perhaps we could make the store Wisconsin-sized. Yes, that would be acceptable. You could have the Burrough of Sweatpants for instance. Walk the Street of Savings and enjoy the Township of Tupperware.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-01-2010, 05:45 PM
 
Location: Seattle area, via Bay Area and Phoenix
1,486 posts, read 3,272,464 times
Reputation: 509
And I disagree. The other poster didn't define "bad," especially in comparison to an empty building, but I sure don't see the argument, if you want to call it that.

Target - a downsized version, I might add - will fill a void for downtown residents, workers, and tourists. There really aren't many alternatives there for a lot of the stuff Target sells, like home electronics, among many other examples. So I don't see how "diversity and shopping choices" are harmed; it's not the same situation as when Target and Wal-Mart move in and hurt small-town merchants. My guess is that the Louis Vuitton store nearby won't lose a lot of sleep about this.

But for those who don't like Target and consider it inherently "evil," there is an easy solution for you. Just don't go.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 70Ford View Post
I agree. THe less diversity and shopping choices you have, the better.

I think one store in the USA, preferably in Wisconsin should suffice. Perhaps we could make the store Wisconsin-sized. Yes, that would be acceptable. You could have the Burrough of Sweatpants for instance. Walk the Street of Savings and enjoy the Township of Tupperware.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-01-2010, 07:27 PM
 
Location: South Georgia
8,399 posts, read 5,605,834 times
Reputation: 4563
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelinWA View Post
And I disagree. The other poster didn't define "bad," especially in comparison to an empty building, but I sure don't see the argument, if you want to call it that.

Target - a downsized version, I might add - will fill a void for downtown residents, workers, and tourists. There really aren't many alternatives there for a lot of the stuff Target sells, like home electronics, among many other examples. So I don't see how "diversity and shopping choices" are harmed; it's not the same situation as when Target and Wal-Mart move in and hurt small-town merchants. My guess is that the Louis Vuitton store nearby won't lose a lot of sleep about this.

But for those who don't like Target and consider it inherently "evil," there is an easy solution for you. Just don't go.
Sarcasm - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

THere's a Target about 10 miinutes from us in Sammamish. We shop there all the time. Although, Fred Meyers is closer. I do prefer Tagret over Wal-Mart. It just seems brighter. Wal-mart has more fishing stuff, though.

You didn't seriously think I wanted a store the size of Winsconsin, did you? Rhode Island sized is good enough.

Last edited by 70Ford; 08-01-2010 at 07:49 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-02-2010, 09:10 AM
 
6,750 posts, read 10,108,985 times
Reputation: 2604
A city should have stores that reflect it's population. Seattle is not only made up of people who make 200,000 dollars per year and shop at Louis Vuitton, but also people who patronize such lowbrow shops as Target. I like Target. I am a lowbrow shopper. Too bad you have go east of the International District to shop at Goodwill.
Also, for years and years and years, there was a JC Penney store less than a block away from where the Target is going in. I used to go downtown on a daily basis. I would have loved a Target store there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-02-2010, 10:08 AM
 
Location: Seattle Area
3,003 posts, read 3,367,835 times
Reputation: 2461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ira500 View Post
A city should have stores that reflect it's population. Seattle is not only made up of people who make 200,000 dollars per year and shop at Louis Vuitton, but also people who patronize such lowbrow shops as Target. I like Target. I am a lowbrow shopper. Too bad you have go east of the International District to shop at Goodwill.
Also, for years and years and years, there was a JC Penney store less than a block away from where the Target is going in. I used to go downtown on a daily basis. I would have loved a Target store there.
My mother worked in the appliance section of the Penney's store downtown for many years.

Remember the Woolworth's store on 3rd Ave, another "lowbrow" place...but they had the best lunch counter!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Options
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2005-2010 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $47,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Washington > Seattle area

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:08 PM.

© 2005-2013, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 - Top