U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Washington > Seattle area
 [Register]
Seattle area Seattle and King County Suburbs
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply
 
Unread 08-26-2010, 04:30 PM
 
Location: Moose Jaw, in between the Moose's butt and nose.
4,221 posts, read 3,151,431 times
Reputation: 1252
Someone said earlier that Portland and Seattle are twin cities.....I think that's more accurate when you say Seattle and Vancouver (BC)...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Unread 08-30-2010, 09:44 PM
 
3,449 posts, read 4,925,393 times
Reputation: 1282
Seattle and Portland are twins only in geography. In truth, they are entirely different cities. Portland is content as a medium-sized city, somewhat anti-business, more organic, and happy to be exactly what it is, a smaller city that offers some big city amenities.

Seattle is still in a bodybuilding phase. It wants to be bigger, it wants more industry, and traffic problems are considered minor inconveniences. Light rail is starting to grow, but there is little urgency about it. Highway construction brings great debate.

Portland is fine where it is. Seattle is not content until it continues to grow. Those are the major differences. Your Seattle-Vancouver comparison brings much more reality to the debate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-30-2010, 09:58 PM
 
1,492 posts, read 1,478,433 times
Reputation: 636
Quote:
Originally Posted by stuckinseattle View Post
Portland is exactly what it appears to be. Seattle, on the other hand, is exactly what Dan Savage says it to be: it's Boise that thinks it's Paris. You do not get value for your money here. There's a superficial appearance of concern for the environment, culture, and sophistication, but there's no real depth behind it. Culturewise, Portland is equally full of smalltown climbers trying to get above their raising, but you're not paying through the nose to live with them. Portland is also much better governed and has reasonable transit. Do not think you can live in Seattle without a car. I moved here thinking it was possible (I can't drive) and I am totally isolated and stuck.
Columnists make their living coming up with clever witticisms describing how much the city in which they live sucks.

I disagree with the "superficial concern" comment...while there are certainly people who fit that description, but they are well outnumbered by people who truly care for and are involved in those aspects of their communities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-31-2010, 02:52 PM
 
Location: Seattle
808 posts, read 1,042,542 times
Reputation: 400
Portland is better governed, yes.
And yes you can live in Seattle w/o a car just as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-31-2010, 11:03 PM
 
402 posts, read 515,607 times
Reputation: 223
Quote:
Originally Posted by pw72 View Post
Seattle and Portland are twins only in geography. In truth, they are entirely different cities. Portland is content as a medium-sized city, somewhat anti-business, more organic, and happy to be exactly what it is, a smaller city that offers some big city amenities.

Seattle is still in a bodybuilding phase. It wants to be bigger, it wants more industry, and traffic problems are considered minor inconveniences. Light rail is starting to grow, but there is little urgency about it. Highway construction brings great debate.

Portland is fine where it is. Seattle is not content until it continues to grow. Those are the major differences. Your Seattle-Vancouver comparison brings much more reality to the debate.
I'm confused as to why there are so many posts here that claim Seattle is not developed or as industrious as it purports to be. And yes, I just used the word purport . . . I thought it sounded intelligent.

Seriously though, I've never had that impression on any visit to the city. The financial district in Seattle compares pretty favorably to San Francisco IMO. I've actually had the opposite impression of what you described in most of my visits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 09-01-2010, 06:43 AM
 
Location: Kenmore, WA
5,615 posts, read 2,181,981 times
Reputation: 7736
Both will fit your needs. Being a MI native, I can tell you that Seattle and its northern neighbors (beyond Everett) will be more like home to your present local (Traverse City, right?) than Portland.

Either way, the other is not that far away, especially if you don't mind flying, so you will have plenty of options to check both out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 09-04-2010, 04:41 AM
 
883 posts, read 1,214,963 times
Reputation: 747
The OP posted this 4 years ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 09-04-2010, 07:10 AM
 
4,012 posts, read 2,427,948 times
Reputation: 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by pw72 View Post
Seattle and Portland are twins only in geography. In truth, they are entirely different cities. Portland is content as a medium-sized city, somewhat anti-business, more organic, and happy to be exactly what it is, a smaller city that offers some big city amenities.

Seattle is still in a bodybuilding phase. It wants to be bigger, it wants more industry, and traffic problems are considered minor inconveniences. Light rail is starting to grow, but there is little urgency about it. Highway construction brings great debate.

Portland is fine where it is. Seattle is not content until it continues to grow. Those are the major differences. Your Seattle-Vancouver comparison brings much more reality to the debate.

I really liked your post before this one comparing Seattle and Portland and the noticeable differences mentality between them, but that post just comes off as a bit too negative towards Seattle. I think its just the type of examples you used that made it come across like that. Especially coming from a native Seattillite such as you. Maybe you are not trying to come across like that and if thats the case, I can see how you feel like that.

Portland does have great things about it but there are a lot of things Seattle beats Portland in that was mentioned in some posts before.
There seems to be quite a lot more people in general that views Seattle more favorably than Portland too.

BUT there is this mixed state of mind/attitude, discontentment, and restlessness that exists about Seattle's urbanity and Seattle's scale in terms of size while it is almost non-existent with Portland. Basically, Seattle can feel big/medium/small in terms of size at the same time with certain people wanting Seattle to be perceived as big while for Portland it feels medium /small in terms of size with people not caring if Portland is perceived as a big city or not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 09-05-2010, 08:41 PM
 
3,449 posts, read 4,925,393 times
Reputation: 1282
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thepastpresentandfuture View Post
I really liked your post before this one comparing Seattle and Portland and the noticeable differences mentality between them, but that post just comes off as a bit too negative towards Seattle. I think its just the type of examples you used that made it come across like that. Especially coming from a native Seattillite such as you. Maybe you are not trying to come across like that and if thats the case, I can see how you feel like that.

Portland does have great things about it but there are a lot of things Seattle beats Portland in that was mentioned in some posts before.
There seems to be quite a lot more people in general that views Seattle more favorably than Portland too.

BUT there is this mixed state of mind/attitude, discontentment, and restlessness that exists about Seattle's urbanity and Seattle's scale in terms of size while it is almost non-existent with Portland. Basically, Seattle can feel big/medium/small in terms of size at the same time with certain people wanting Seattle to be perceived as big while for Portland it feels medium /small in terms of size with people not caring if Portland is perceived as a big city or not.
Well, I'm not sure if you are comparing posts that I may have made on this thread. I will try to sum it up. Portland is a medium-sized city that wants to stay that way. Seattle is a bigger city that wants to continue that growth. There are major differences indeed...and the big conflict in Seattle seems to be how to reach their goals. Some want Seattle to be more urban with more public transportation, some are ok with the "LA-style" spread. This creates interesting, yet, bogged-down debate in Seattle. The debate slows everything down, and that is quite frustrating.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 09-05-2010, 08:42 PM
 
4,012 posts, read 2,427,948 times
Reputation: 2003
To pw72: I agree with that last post of yours! Thats exactly what I was trying to say, but in different wording.

"
BUT there is this mixed state of mind/attitude, discontentment, and restlessness that exists about Seattle's urbanity and Seattle's scale in terms of size while it is almost non-existent with Portland. Basically, Seattle can feel big/medium/small in terms of size at the same time with certain people wanting Seattle to be perceived as big while for Portland it feels medium /small in terms of size with people not caring if Portland is perceived as a big city or not."

But the way you said it was better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Options
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2005-2010 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $47,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Washington > Seattle area
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:24 AM.

© 2005-2013, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 - Top