U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Washington > Seattle area
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Seattle area Seattle and King County Suburbs

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 02-14-2008, 09:24 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
209 posts, read 206,952 times
Reputation: 47
Condorll is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by drewba View Post
There's an interesting article in the Seattle Times today that ties much of the rise in housing prices to government regulations such as the Growth Management Act, Critical Areas Ordinance and permitting processes. The inflation adjusted median price of homes in the Seattle area increased from $221,000 to $447,800 between 1989 and 2006. According to this UW study, almost $200k of that increase was due to regulations.

Business & Technology | UW study: Rules add $200,000 to Seattle house price | Seattle Times Newspaper
That would mean without the regulations pricing would have gone from 221 to 247 in 17 years? That's nonsense. Whoever wrote that article and/or is interpreting that data needs a serious education in math and real estate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-14-2008, 11:49 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
73 posts, read 77,220 times
Reputation: 17
drewba is on a distinguished road
While I have a hard time fully accepting the researcher's findings given the dramatic run-up of the past 7 years, the median numbers quoted are inflation adjusted. Thus, the actual median price was far lower than $221,000 in 1989.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2008, 06:33 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hipsterville
19 posts, read 26,761 times
Reputation: 23
studioiduts is on a distinguished road
Default The sub prime is not just mortgages

We have a sub-prime financial system. All these mortgages were wrapped up in investment packages. And it wasn't just residential mortgages. It was also commercial mortgages, credit cards, student loans, equity loans and car loans. All these were divided and chopped up into SIVs(Structured investment Vehicles) and CDOs (Collateralised Debt Obligations). These were sold off as investment packages all over the world as well as through public companies for 401k's. These were basically, fraudulently rated as AAA through Moodys, colluding with the big banks, in order to sell them. Now they are all blowing up. High foreclosure rates. High delinquent rates. Repos. People walking out on there homes and mailing in the keys to the bank. All the commercial lending has stopped. None of the banks now trust each other because no one knows what kind of toxic garbage is on each banks books. It is spreading into the prime lending as well. You also have the municipal bonds that could potentially blow up. They were financed by sales tax, property tax and corporate tax. They were insured by outside organizations (monolines) to be guaranteed. Well,now you have house prices falling, so proerty taxes are falling. We are in a recession with stagflation and now spending way down. So low sales tax collection. PPI is high as commodities and commercial supplies are inflating in price, combined with low sales. Corporate profit taxes are on decline. This leeds to a default by the local gov on muni bonds. The insurers don't have enough money to cover a default. The bonds won't be paid. Combined with a negative economy, high inflation, no credit, high unemployment, a potential stock market crash, an outrageous deficit and the possibility for people's life savings of 401k's to be wiped out, it's a nice storm that's brewing.

Home sales are just a small part of everything. You can't buy one without credit unless your paying cash. All the lending institutions are bankrupt. All the "stimulus" isn't going to do a thing. It's all just putting off the inevitable. And it will hit that much harder in the end.

Don't buy anything. Rent at a low rate and wait things out. The whole market is toxic at the moment.

see:

RGE - The Coming Muni Bonds Default Crisis…and the Monoline Downgrade Saga…

RGE - The Worsening Credit Crunch...

The Daily Reckoning

RGE - The Rising Risk of a Systemic Financial Meltdown: The Twelve Steps to Financial Disaster

Mike Whitney: Henry Paulsen's Wild Ride on the Economic Hindenberg
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2008, 11:59 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
209 posts, read 206,952 times
Reputation: 47
Condorll is on a distinguished road
Well,now you have house prices falling, so proerty taxes are falling.
.....................................

Where do you renters get your info?

Seattle Property Taxes are not falling, they have gone up a few bucks and so has the appraised value for 2008 (I just got my 2008 tax bill yesterday, appraisal up 9 %, mill rate down, Total Property taxes up 1% for 2008).

Doom and Gloomers will be renters forever.

I saw the same thing in the 70's, late 80's and now again. Bought my first home with a 1st mortgage at 13% and a second mortage at 18% back in the late 70's. A little short term pain for major long term gain.

This is the buying opportunity of a lifetime with 5.7% mortgages fixed for 30 years!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2008, 08:23 PM
Senior Member
Status: "City data compliments me better than my husband." (set 9 days ago)
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Seattle area
679 posts, read 496,351 times
Reputation: 275
jenlion is a jewel in the roughjenlion is a jewel in the roughjenlion is a jewel in the roughjenlion is a jewel in the roughjenlion is a jewel in the roughjenlion is a jewel in the rough
5.7? We locked in 5.25 a couple weeks ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2008, 10:03 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hipsterville
19 posts, read 26,761 times
Reputation: 23
studioiduts is on a distinguished road
5.x percent on an asset for 30 years that will drop in value 20 -30% within the next 2 years. Add on to that, that if you do stay in it for life(you won't) you pay 3 times the borrowed amount because of the interest. And inflation running 12%. Good luck with that, sucker.I don't understand how you think you are getting any value out of that. That's real estate speculation. And that's exactly what's unwinding right now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2008, 12:41 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
209 posts, read 206,952 times
Reputation: 47
Condorll is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by studioiduts View Post
5.x percent on an asset for 30 years that will drop in value 20 -30% within the next 2 years. Add on to that, that if you do stay in it for life(you won't) you pay 3 times the borrowed amount because of the interest. And inflation running 12%. Good luck with that, sucker.I don't understand how you think you are getting any value out of that. That's real estate speculation. And that's exactly what's unwinding right now.


So, you are the "Big Businessman" that moved from Atlanta to Portland to open a music studio and failed. Got raked over on a lease among other problems.

Seems to me before you start touting your so called "financial expertise", posting nonsense statistics and calling people suckers, you need to take a good hard look at your own failures.

Free advice is just what it is...consider the source.
Studioiduts is not a credible source.

My 2 cents
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2008, 12:06 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
6 posts, read 8,430 times
Reputation: 11
oldie is on a distinguished road
While it's easy to look for someone to blame for the housing prices, all we need to do is get in front of a mirror- the market is set by the public. Someone is paying those insane prices. It's like with professional athletes. We moan that they are overpaid by millions of dollars. Well, technically they're not: there are owners willing to shell out for them, so that's what they're worth!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2008, 12:21 PM
Oh, yeah!
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Warm, sunny Iraq.
2,093 posts, read 1,601,347 times
Reputation: 1166
70Ford has much to be proud of70Ford has much to be proud of70Ford has much to be proud of70Ford has much to be proud of70Ford has much to be proud of70Ford has much to be proud of70Ford has much to be proud of70Ford has much to be proud of70Ford has much to be proud of70Ford has much to be proud of70Ford has much to be proud of70Ford has much to be proud of70Ford has much to be proud of70Ford has much to be proud of70Ford has much to be proud of70Ford has much to be proud of70Ford has much to be proud of70Ford has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldie View Post
While it's easy to look for someone to blame for the housing prices, all we need to do is get in front of a mirror- the market is set by the public. Someone is paying those insane prices. It's like with professional athletes. We moan that they are overpaid by millions of dollars. Well, technically they're not: there are owners willing to shell out for them, so that's what they're worth!
Hrmm...what is the market/public saying now?

The median home-sales price in Washington during the fourth quarter was $293,900, down 2.5 percent from the final quarter of 2006. That's the first year-to-year decline since the center began compiling the data in 1994, Crellin said.

In King County, sales were down 28.1 percent to 24,170 and the median price dropped 0.2 percent to $439,000. In Snohomish County, sales were off 35.8 percent to 8,620, while the price rose 2.4 percent to $363,400.

Pierce County saw a 35.1 percent drop in sales to 10,600 and the median price dropped 0.5 percent to $275,000, while sales were off 23.6 percent in Kitsap County to 3,430 homes, with the median price down 2.6 percent to $272,600.

Real Estate | Home sales, prices decline across Washington | Seattle Times Newspaper
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2008, 01:48 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
33 posts, read 34,076 times
Reputation: 15
baba_yaga is on a distinguished road
Sales are down in King County because people aren't buying as indiscriminately as when it was a seller's market. Prices are down 0.2%, that's nothing. Seems like a more normal market to me. The best homes in the better locations are still going STI within a few days.

Of course, I last bought in 1995 when interest rates were high and buyers had a lot of choices.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Washington > Seattle area

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:00 PM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top