U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Washington > Seattle area
 [Register]
Seattle area Seattle and King County Suburbs
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-26-2016, 12:00 PM
 
61 posts, read 50,510 times
Reputation: 33

Advertisements

Wealthy overseas buyers to face new real estate tax in Vancouver

Opinion?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-27-2016, 11:03 PM
 
Location: Bellevue, WA
1,487 posts, read 3,603,459 times
Reputation: 560
Love it! While it might soften home price appreciation (good as a safety net), I'm so tired of these foreign buyers snapping up houses that they either rent out or more often, leave vacant.

It's destroyed many a neighborhood around here. Even when they rent, they rarely keep up the properties. They care not one bit about any of the neighbors and only of the cash flow. I really wish that they'd move on from Seattle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2016, 03:01 PM
 
Location: Lynnwood, Wa
13 posts, read 19,431 times
Reputation: 51
One reason it makes sense is that they're doing it in Vancouver. Vancouver is pretty much implementing a price control, which may drive buyers down here, contributing to OUR problem. It may be a good idea for, if nothing else, curbing that influx.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2016, 11:18 AM
 
Location: Vancouver
11,375 posts, read 7,825,285 times
Reputation: 6442
The BC government is in election mode. That is the only reason they decided to look like they were doing something after years of ignoring or saying there was an issue. They rushed it through without thinking about the fall out.

It applies only to Vancouver area and not the rest of the province, so smaller communities are worried that the foreign buyers will just move there and drive up their prices.

The headline the OP linked to is misleading. It's not just wealthy overseas buyers, it's ANY foreign buyer. This poor guy is an example of that.

New real estate tax harming foreigners working in B.C., says American buyer - British Columbia - CBC News

Last edited by Natnasci; 07-29-2016 at 11:55 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2016, 05:31 PM
 
1,809 posts, read 2,890,700 times
Reputation: 2305
I think they should put a huge tax on any foreign national purchasing of single family homes and condos. If they want to buy here there should be a massive 20%+ tax on the purchase price at closing. It does no one any good and brings no value to local citizens when foreign national multi-millionaires just use local houses and condos to park their cash and get it out of their home country (I would probably extend tax 1-4 units). All it does is inflate the local housing market more for local families that want to buy the house to live as their primary residence and raise their families.

I have no problem with foreign nationals investing in apartments and other commercial property with no additional tax.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2016, 07:35 PM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, originally from SF Bay Area
28,386 posts, read 50,562,503 times
Reputation: 28616
I would support the tax on any foreign investment purchases, residential or commercial, but not for owner-occupied residential, which is very common here. The foreign people buying the $600k+ existing homes and new million dollar homes are living in them with their families, and are working in Seattle or on the eastside. In fact, many new developments are doing dual-masters to accommodate their extended families. The demand, and the ongoing local spending of these immigrants is good for the economy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2016, 06:01 PM
 
Location: Bellevue, WA
1,487 posts, read 3,603,459 times
Reputation: 560
I don't know what neighborhood you live in, but the people buying one million-dollar homes here leave them vacant or rent them out. They are doing it specifically under the EB-5 program. If the home is more than $1m, they needn't prove jobs or being in a high unemployment area. All of the homes in our area are above 1 million, so they literally have agents driving around caravans of people from China on a regular basis.

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/edito...127-story.html

If you can afford to buy your way to permanent residency in the US, a tax isn't out of the question.

I'm not referring to families that came over here to work, and later settled. They are as welcome as anyone. I'm talking about people that are using US real estate to park their money and to buy their way into residency if they ever should decide to pursue it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2016, 01:04 PM
 
Location: Seattle
5,041 posts, read 3,828,043 times
Reputation: 2971
Sounds xenophobic to me, and I'm a pretty open minded person.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2016, 05:00 PM
 
Location: Seattle
1,361 posts, read 2,845,666 times
Reputation: 1453
A 15% transaction tax is generally really poor policy IMO. For one, it penalizes foreign resident workers who purchase property as a primary residence. It also does nothing to address the problem of current absentee ownership of property that is left vacant and does nothing to address the existing pricing problem. Plus, I think such law would not really be legal in the US.

A far better solution is to raise property taxes and give homestead exemptions for primary owners/residents. In general we should provide tax disincentives for people to own many properties. If ones tax rate to own a second house is significantly higher than for a primary resident, it will make sense for owners to dispense of additional properties and free up the property market for owner occupants. This discourages homes from being rented out as Airbnb and monthly rentals, and leaves that market specifically for larger buildings or multifamily buildings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Options
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2016 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Washington > Seattle area
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2018, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top