Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Washington > Seattle area
 [Register]
Seattle area Seattle and King County Suburbs
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-07-2016, 09:44 AM
 
Location: No Man's Land
153 posts, read 197,161 times
Reputation: 178

Advertisements

Has anyone see this map of all the developments going on in Seattle Metro proper?


https://www.seattleinprogress.com/

It's crazy how they're demolishing so many existing structures to put up more condos and office buildings. Now I understand why the natives are angry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-07-2016, 03:26 PM
 
Location: Seattle
8,171 posts, read 8,301,458 times
Reputation: 5991
In my work, I see building everywhere I drive. It is pretty shocking, though, to see it all together like this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2016, 07:54 PM
 
Location: WA Desert, Seattle native
9,398 posts, read 8,880,044 times
Reputation: 8812
Seattle's central core is on fire, no doubt. Some fail to realize the outer neighborhoods are basically the same, with the occasional low/mid-rise apartment/condo/senior housing coming on to the scene. Seattle still offers plenty of single family homes with big yards and around parks and good schools. Yep, expensive for sure. But Seattle's core should not be interpreted as the whole city, not by a long shot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2016, 07:11 AM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,585 posts, read 81,186,228 times
Reputation: 57820
Quote:
Originally Posted by pnwguy2 View Post
Seattle's central core is on fire, no doubt. Some fail to realize the outer neighborhoods are basically the same, with the occasional low/mid-rise apartment/condo/senior housing coming on to the scene. Seattle still offers plenty of single family homes with big yards and around parks and good schools. Yep, expensive for sure. But Seattle's core should not be interpreted as the whole city, not by a long shot.
Having spent yesterday in Ballard, I can see that it's not limited to the downtown core. Besides the huge apartments and condos on Market St., many new, ultra-modern homes are replacing old homes, mixed with the old Victorians in the Avenues.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2016, 10:45 AM
 
Location: WA Desert, Seattle native
9,398 posts, read 8,880,044 times
Reputation: 8812
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemlock140 View Post
Having spent yesterday in Ballard, I can see that it's not limited to the downtown core. Besides the huge apartments and condos on Market St., many new, ultra-modern homes are replacing old homes, mixed with the old Victorians in the Avenues.
I hear you on Ballard. But I believe Ballard is the exception, not the rule.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2016, 10:53 AM
 
329 posts, read 1,028,987 times
Reputation: 438
Lol at people thinking this is a bad thing. There were so many parking lots that sat vacant before, now they are filling up creating a more consistent urban streetscape. I like Seattle as a denser, more cosmopolitan, walkable, happening city. Bring on the cranes, hustle bustle urban lifestyle. Nearly any other city would kill for our thriving economy. No more sleepy backwater town, Seattle is on it's way to be world class.

Out with the Tevas, in with the Manolos.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2016, 11:32 AM
 
332 posts, read 398,271 times
Reputation: 264
Quote:
Originally Posted by destroycreate View Post
Lol at people thinking this is a bad thing. There were so many parking lots that sat vacant before, now they are filling up creating a more consistent urban streetscape. I like Seattle as a denser, more cosmopolitan, walkable, happening city. Bring on the cranes, hustle bustle urban lifestyle. Nearly any other city would kill for our thriving economy. No more sleepy backwater town, Seattle is on it's way to be world class.

Out with the Tevas, in with the Manolos.
The issue is Seattle won't be able to accomodate the growth for a decade or two. Congestion issues are pretty bad now but are going to be unbearable shortly. Enjoy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2016, 01:07 PM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,585 posts, read 81,186,228 times
Reputation: 57820
Quote:
Originally Posted by destroycreate View Post
Lol at people thinking this is a bad thing. There were so many parking lots that sat vacant before, now they are filling up creating a more consistent urban streetscape. I like Seattle as a denser, more cosmopolitan, walkable, happening city. Bring on the cranes, hustle bustle urban lifestyle. Nearly any other city would kill for our thriving economy. No more sleepy backwater town, Seattle is on it's way to be world class.

Out with the Tevas, in with the Manolos.
I agree with you, especially on surface parking lots, but they are also demolishing some historic old buildings. Hopefully they are the ones that cannot be reasonably brought up to current earthquake standards.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2016, 04:06 PM
 
Location: No Man's Land
153 posts, read 197,161 times
Reputation: 178
I really want to move out there! I went to visit earlier this year and fell in love with the vibrancy, the layout grid of the city itself, easy transit and yes, I LOVED the rain. I just need to find a good job first before I make the leap.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2016, 04:40 PM
 
329 posts, read 1,028,987 times
Reputation: 438
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemlock140 View Post
I agree with you, especially on surface parking lots, but they are also demolishing some historic old buildings. Hopefully they are the ones that cannot be reasonably brought up to current earthquake standards.
Personally I don't find that they are demolishing true historic gems though. Many of those ratty old houses weren't particularly attractive, unlike many of the older craftsman/bungalow houses are in Cap Hill. Also, many of the older brick buildings (and don't get me wrong, I love brick) are complete earthquake hazards anyway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Washington > Seattle area
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:22 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top