|

03-30-2009, 03:10 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
957 posts, read 187,983 times
Reputation: 195
|
|
|
I'd like to see Factoria Mall management copy Crossroads' model. But it looks like they'll continue down the path to failure by making it more upscale.
|
|

03-30-2009, 06:31 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Rocky Mountain West, native Seattleite
1,411 posts, read 987,077 times
Reputation: 372
|
|
|
This "twin cities" concept doesn't make much sense to me. While the population of the eastside may someday exceed Seattle, there just isn't the history, the established neighborhoods, or the name recognition that Seattle has.
Just 30 years ago Bellevue was a medium-sized mall, a bowling alley, a couple of low rise office buildings, and there were 1950's rambler-style homes where today's skyscrapers now stand. The change has been dramatic, but so have a lot of places in the U.S. (Las Vegas, Atlanta, Miami/Miami Beach, Wash DC metro, to name a few).
I believe the future of Bellevue will be more density downtown, but also several regional centers where people can live and work in generally the same neighborhoods. The Bel-Red area is being talked about in this regard. Other locations could be Factoria, Eastgate, Issaquah.
|
|

03-31-2009, 03:00 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sumner, WA
112 posts, read 98,770 times
Reputation: 26
|
|
|
It sounds as if Bellevue will become just like Arlington. If the different areas of Crossroads, Factoria, and Bel-Red are going to be developed more, the Light Rail may extend to these areas as well. Bellevue would be just like Arlington in that there will be several commuter centers along the Light Rail line. Bellevue could have three different downtown centers.
|
|

04-01-2009, 12:09 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: US Empire, Pac NW
1,060 posts, read 415,659 times
Reputation: 428
|
|
|
Until Bellevue establishes culture of its own, or many small neighborhoods with distinct feels, like Seattle, then it will never "match" Seattle. The population of the suburbs of Seattle has exceeded that of Seattle proper but man, what a difference in feel! If Bellevue can develop where I can WALK, not drive, to where I want to go, awesome.
|
|

04-01-2009, 03:27 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
957 posts, read 187,983 times
Reputation: 195
|
|
|
Having lived in both Seattle and Bellevue, I find the latter to be similarly walkable in parts. I'm not interested in walking to a mom-and-pop bookstore for its tiny selection, or schlepping home groceries. I'm more interested in walking to a Blockbuster, coffee shop, or park, and not having to watch my back so much. Bellevue has lots of trails, if only the sidewalk variety. Issaquah, where I've also lived, might be more walkable than either Bellevue or Seattle, esp. if you're willing to walk a couple miles.
|
|

04-01-2009, 06:01 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
1,730 posts, read 2,221,054 times
Reputation: 913
|
|
|
I don't find anything similar about walking in Bellevue and Seattle. When walking in Seattle I can walk to mom and pop or the chains. Seattle you have choices, and many more choices especially in the restaurant and entertainment department. And for someone to associate Bellevue Square with being upscale is laughable imo.
|
|

04-01-2009, 07:07 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
46 posts, read 21,265 times
Reputation: 27
|
|
|
As an outsider from Ohio I found it lovely and wondered how anyone could afford to live there if they were not making over $200k a year. I live in a similar area here in Ohio but the home prices are 1/3 of the cost. Fine for many but not all.
|
|

04-01-2009, 07:31 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
957 posts, read 187,983 times
Reputation: 195
|
|
|
pwright1, where have you walked in Bellevue?
This past week I walked around both Seattle and Bellevue. There's certainly a greater concentration of stuff in Seattle, which is nice; however, when you factor in the panhandlers and the need to be extra alert, Bellevue comes out looking pretty good in comparison. In Bellevue, if I come across a trail I haven't seen before, I can confidently venture forth, whereas in Seattle it's a safe bet I'll stumble into someone's makeshift encampment, or worse. Many parks around downtown Seattle are useless. E.g. Denny Park.
Of course any Bellevueite can combine the bus to get the best of both worlds. I'm fond of bussing to some cheap good eat in Seattle, walking from there to a favorite coffee shop, then take the bus back to Bellevue, sometimes walking back from a park & ride, through parks & trails. The bus is reading time.
|
|

04-01-2009, 08:46 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
199 posts, read 115,803 times
Reputation: 67
|
|
|
The eastside is so much nicer than dingy Seattle, when it comes to the examples described by Heiwos (which are indisputable), that the typical comeback from a Seattle resident is to just shrug and say that Seattle has more, like, well, you know, diversity and stuff. Nevermind the eastside has more diversity too! You should see the demographic in my kids' class. Indian and SE Asian predominantly.
|
|

04-01-2009, 09:17 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
40 posts, read 50,314 times
Reputation: 17
|
|
|
I wouldn't say having a significant Asian population makes Bellevue "diverse", especially considering the "model minority" stereotype. The African American and Latino population in Bellevue is pretty tiny (about 2% and 4% respectively, compared to around 10% and 6% in Seattle).
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|