Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Self-Sufficiency and Preparedness
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-05-2016, 05:07 PM
 
Location: When you take flak it means you are on target
7,646 posts, read 9,949,132 times
Reputation: 16466

Advertisements

Here it is the dream home you have all been waiting for - for the measly sum of only $832 grand you, yes You can have your very own nuclear bunker complete with decontamination chambers and a kitchen!

I see a bidding war on this one! LOL

Now, if Ireland just had 2nd Amendment rights you could fill it with your very own missile!

For sale: Sweet bunker for a cool $832,000 (23 Pics)

Last edited by jamies; 02-05-2016 at 05:41 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-05-2016, 08:16 PM
 
13,131 posts, read 20,984,674 times
Reputation: 21410
Oh my god, SPB, haven't seen that place in years! I will say, someone has spruced that place up as it's last use was storage and an armory. Honestly, I think some of the items they are showing are more for ambiance and are not fully functional as they were originally. The only drawback is it's located within a suburban industrial area and if memory serves me correctly, maybe 30 or so miles from Belfast via the M2. However, even if most of the interior is for show purposes, the structure itself is an actual UK nuclear shelter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2016, 07:14 AM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,194,933 times
Reputation: 5240
you can already get those in the USA, no need to go to another country.


ATLAS F MISSILE BASE SILOHOME LUXURY HOME WITH PRIVATE AIRPORT
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2016, 05:06 PM
 
Location: Southern Colorado
3,680 posts, read 2,964,604 times
Reputation: 4809
I think missile silo's would be somewhat apt to be targeted. Maybe not specific silo's but areas where there are a lot of missile silo's.

Seem to recall old missile silo's being available for ~$30,000...years ago....90's? Decrepit? Probably.

Imagine what it costs to build these things. Shiver.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2016, 06:35 PM
 
6,224 posts, read 6,612,356 times
Reputation: 4489
This is all hypothetical as how many folk can actually afford to move from their home now to any bunker type abode? That said, a good idea but at very least, getting into like-minded "patriot turf" would help. Those states of MT, WY, ID & eastern WA & OR seems the best for -- most like-minded to the cause. I think end of world status takes some doing yet, for most & I know, to be ready for ANYTHING is a HUGE task -- let alone feasible if not attempted on a day to day plan. Ok, just my 2 cents but I think it is on the mark.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2016, 10:54 PM
 
13,131 posts, read 20,984,674 times
Reputation: 21410
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColoGuy View Post
I think missile silo's would be somewhat apt to be targeted. Maybe not specific silo's but areas where there are a lot of missile silo's.

Seem to recall old missile silo's being available for ~$30,000...years ago....90's? Decrepit? Probably.

Imagine what it costs to build these things. Shiver.
Missile silos and their launch control facility really aren't designed for long term survival. They would need massive and expensive retrofitting to make them habitable even as a survival shelter.

The silo itself were never designed for human occupation. Since the missile had its own stored combustion, it wouldn't matter how poisonous or contaminated the silo's air became because the missile didn't need to breath like humans. As a result, ventilation was for maintenance purposes and exhaust, never for living. Since most missiles would have been launched before the opposing missiles struck their targets, there was never a need to have a ventilation system that can survive any type of long term contamination or even survive a blast. Since the odds are there were no missiles left to launch when the first opposing missiles hit, ventilation and contamination control was never a priority for the silo itself.

The launch control facility was also not designed for long -term survival. The missile launch crews was only needed to be kept alive inside the facility just long enough to launch the missiles. Afterwards, they were just an expendable item. Although the launch facility did have a breathable environment, in an emergency it was sealed off and minimal life support ventilation was available. Once again, the aim of the facility was to keep the crew alive just long enough to launch the missiles not survive the aftermath for any length of time.

Like any underground or encapsulated facility, (missile silo, launch control, bunker, hidy-hole) the weakest part is ventilation. If you look at the US government's survival shelters, you will notice the ventilation system is quite elaborate and far reaching. In some locations the intake and exhaust vents can be miles from the facility with multiple spider systems that enables vents to be isolated if some form of contamination is detected. Silos and launch control facilities have the ventilation intakes and exhaust within the fence line and at some of the Atlas sites, a big tarp and roll of duct tape was all it takes to suffocate those below ground.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2016, 12:13 AM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,194,933 times
Reputation: 5240
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rabrrita View Post
Missile silos and their launch control facility really aren't designed for long term survival. They would need massive and expensive retrofitting to make them habitable even as a survival shelter.

The silo itself were never designed for human occupation. Since the missile had its own stored combustion, it wouldn't matter how poisonous or contaminated the silo's air became because the missile didn't need to breath like humans. As a result, ventilation was for maintenance purposes and exhaust, never for living. Since most missiles would have been launched before the opposing missiles struck their targets, there was never a need to have a ventilation system that can survive any type of long term contamination or even survive a blast. Since the odds are there were no missiles left to launch when the first opposing missiles hit, ventilation and contamination control was never a priority for the silo itself.

The launch control facility was also not designed for long -term survival. The missile launch crews was only needed to be kept alive inside the facility just long enough to launch the missiles. Afterwards, they were just an expendable item. Although the launch facility did have a breathable environment, in an emergency it was sealed off and minimal life support ventilation was available. Once again, the aim of the facility was to keep the crew alive just long enough to launch the missiles not survive the aftermath for any length of time.

Like any underground or encapsulated facility, (missile silo, launch control, bunker, hidy-hole) the weakest part is ventilation. If you look at the US government's survival shelters, you will notice the ventilation system is quite elaborate and far reaching. In some locations the intake and exhaust vents can be miles from the facility with multiple spider systems that enables vents to be isolated if some form of contamination is detected. Silos and launch control facilities have the ventilation intakes and exhaust within the fence line and at some of the Atlas sites, a big tarp and roll of duct tape was all it takes to suffocate those below ground.


^^^^^^ s pretty much correct. better to try and buy 1 of the communications bunkers that the feds sell every now and then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2016, 06:12 AM
 
1,344 posts, read 3,404,759 times
Reputation: 2487
I'll pile on and say the communications bunkers are the way to go.

Many (most?) were part of the AT&T long-lines system. They were meant to keep communications going after some major event (primarily nuclear as this long-lines system was constructed as part of civil defense if the cold war went hot).

They're made to be self-sufficient with their own deep water wells, sewer systems, power/electrical and air filtration. They don't have something like a silo which often become a pond of stagnant water.

Even if you don't find one of the long-line's underground bunkers, they're above-ground facilities are pretty hardened as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Self-Sufficiency and Preparedness
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:55 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top