Quote:
Originally Posted by DannyBanany
I just think it's totally unreasonable for Americans to have access to such heavy artillery. A handgun or a hunting rifle should suffice.
In a past post you said it sounded like I wasn't even from Rapid City because of my "socialist" views. Well, thanks. I stand out I guess. 
|
My Rifle is a .308. It's semi automatic. There are hunting rifles that match that description. Shotguns too. It's an assault weapon primarily because of the way it looks. Many pistols are semi automatic too. Do I need a 50 caliber anti tank weapon or a warhead, of course not. that's just being silly. It is foolish to think that all of the "Obama is going to take our guns away" hype is accurate. It's equally foolish to discard it all as hype... The truth lies somewhere in the middle. Let's limit everyone to owning guns that hold only one bullet at a time, and limit the amount of ammo you can own, would that make you happy? Sure it would, me on the other hand, I see nothing wrong with my rifle, but a single shot, bolt action rifle could kill someone at a distance just as easily.
As for the second part, I don't think I ever said that about you? You might be thinking of someone else? If I did, I probably said it about one of your views, it would not have been a personal comment. That's the beauty of opinions (as long as we're still allowed to have them). We don't have to agree on everything. Making the leap from my silly, single rifle to saying "what's next warheads?" is just not valid and reasonable. You can do better than that...
I'm sure there are many semi-auto AR-15 owners in SD that use them to hunt varmints with. Should we take those away from them because you say so?
Bet this thread is just about ready to be locked...