Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Space
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-04-2011, 10:08 PM
 
Location: Sarasota, Florida
15,395 posts, read 22,513,918 times
Reputation: 11134

Advertisements

This theory is new to me......very interesting and explains why the Moon's hemispheres are so geologically different. It does not change the initial theory that our Moon formed from a collision(of Earth) with a Mars size body; just that two moons were created from that impact and one formed afterward from the two moon's subsequent accretion/collision.

E Pluribus Lunum: Did Earth Once Have Two Moons?: Scientific American

Forming the lunar farside highlands by accretion of a companion moon : Nature : Nature Publishing Group (http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v476/n7358/full/nature10289.html - broken link)

Last edited by PITTSTON2SARASOTA; 08-04-2011 at 10:18 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-04-2011, 10:19 PM
 
Location: North of Canada, but not the Arctic
21,097 posts, read 19,689,090 times
Reputation: 25612
I think we can assume there were a lot of collisions going on 4 1/2 billion years ago.

(Maybe I should have applied for a government grant before releasing such earth-shattering revelations. )
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2011, 10:26 PM
 
Location: Sarasota, Florida
15,395 posts, read 22,513,918 times
Reputation: 11134
Quote:
Originally Posted by Retroit View Post
I think we can assume there were a lot of collisions going on 4 1/2 billion years ago.

(Maybe I should have applied for a government grant before releasing such earth-shattering revelations. )
So much to learn and so little time.

Thanx for the irrelevant input.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2011, 10:39 PM
 
15,912 posts, read 20,186,833 times
Reputation: 7693
I read about this somewhere else, it's an interesting idea and does explain some of the anomalies of the moon's surface features.

Oh for a time machine......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2011, 06:26 AM
 
13,134 posts, read 40,608,169 times
Reputation: 12304
Quote:
Originally Posted by PITTSTON2SARASOTA View Post
This theory is new to me......very interesting and explains why the Moon's hemispheres are so geologically different. It does not change the initial theory that our Moon formed from a collision(of Earth) with a Mars size body; just that two moons were created from that impact and one formed afterward from the two moon's subsequent accretion/collision.

E Pluribus Lunum: Did Earth Once Have Two Moons?: Scientific American

Forming the lunar farside highlands by accretion of a companion moon : Nature : Nature Publishing Group (http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v476/n7358/full/nature10289.html - broken link)
PITTS, if there were two moons at one time and one was obliverated wouldn't we then have a saturn type ring around the earth with the remnants of that former moon?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2011, 12:16 PM
 
Location: Tyler, TX
23,832 posts, read 24,087,427 times
Reputation: 15109
Quote:
Originally Posted by PITTSTON2SARASOTA View Post
Did The Earth Once Have Two Moons?
Still does.

Cruithne, Earths "second moon"

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2011, 04:31 PM
 
28,803 posts, read 47,672,347 times
Reputation: 37905
Quote:
Originally Posted by PITTSTON2SARASOTA View Post
This theory is new to me......very interesting and explains why the Moon's hemispheres are so geologically different. It does not change the initial theory that our Moon formed from a collision(of Earth) with a Mars size body; just that two moons were created from that impact and one formed afterward from the two moon's subsequent accretion/collision.

E Pluribus Lunum: Did Earth Once Have Two Moons?: Scientific American

Forming the lunar farside highlands by accretion of a companion moon : Nature : Nature Publishing Group (http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v476/n7358/full/nature10289.html - broken link)
Hmmmm. I've always thought the two hemispheres were different because the same side always faces Earth and that meant the other side got the most hits from space debris.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2011, 07:13 PM
 
Location: Sarasota, Florida
15,395 posts, read 22,513,918 times
Reputation: 11134
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tek_Freek View Post
Hmmmm. I've always thought the two hemispheres were different because the same side always faces Earth and that meant the other side got the most hits from space debris.
I thought that also......but apparently it's not just the debris fields and meteor impacts but also other geologic features and geochemical composition. I'm sure the "theory" is still being disputed and more evidence would be required.....before we'll see this concept in the science books.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2011, 07:16 PM
 
Location: Sarasota, Florida
15,395 posts, read 22,513,918 times
Reputation: 11134
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6 Foot 3 View Post
PITTS, if there were two moons at one time and one was obliverated wouldn't we then have a saturn type ring around the earth with the remnants of that former moon?
I'm pretty sure that rings are a "temporary" feature of many collisions....at least on an astronomical timescales.....and the collision creating our Moon was about 4.5 Billion years ago.

Planetary ring - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Moon - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2011, 01:22 PM
 
13,134 posts, read 40,608,169 times
Reputation: 12304
Quote:
Originally Posted by PITTSTON2SARASOTA View Post
I'm pretty sure that rings are a "temporary" feature of many collisions....at least on an astronomical timescales.....and the collision creating our Moon was about 4.5 Billion years ago.

Planetary ring - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Moon - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I'm pondering if it's been pulverized into dust over the billions of years that constantly enters our atmosphere and we see it burning up as ''falling stars'' through out the night?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Space
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:10 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top