Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Space
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-12-2012, 09:52 AM
 
3,423 posts, read 3,212,799 times
Reputation: 3321

Advertisements

Wow.

Highest-energy light from a solar flare ever detected

Quote:
ScienceDaily (June 11, 2012) — A solar flare is an explosive blast of light and charged particles. The powerful March 7 flare, which earned a classification of X5.4 based on the peak intensity of its X-rays, is the strongest eruption so far observed by Fermi's Large Area Telescope (LAT). The flare produced such an outpouring of gamma rays -- a form of light with even greater energy than X-rays -- that the sun briefly became the brightest object in the gamma-ray sky.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-12-2012, 04:46 PM
 
23,589 posts, read 70,358,767 times
Reputation: 49216
I wonder if that somehow relates to this:
Earth bathed in high-energy radiation from colossal mystery blast ? The Register
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2012, 04:52 PM
 
3,423 posts, read 3,212,799 times
Reputation: 3321
Quote:
Originally Posted by harry chickpea View Post

Quote:
"We argue that neither a solar flare nor a local supernova is likely to have been responsible" for the burst, say the paper's authors, citing the two most likely sources for such an immense surge in high-energy radiation.
So, I think the answer to your question is probably no, probably.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2012, 06:37 PM
 
23,589 posts, read 70,358,767 times
Reputation: 49216
Not necessarily. I don't think they considered a strong gamma ray burst without a concurrent burst at other parts of the spectrum. Do gamma rays excite the auroras? Just asking...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2012, 07:36 PM
 
3,423 posts, read 3,212,799 times
Reputation: 3321
All I can tell you is what the authors conclusions were.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2012, 08:10 AM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,442,152 times
Reputation: 6541
Quote:
Originally Posted by harry chickpea View Post
Not necessarily. I don't think they considered a strong gamma ray burst without a concurrent burst at other parts of the spectrum. Do gamma rays excite the auroras? Just asking...
Yes. As do x-rays.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2012, 08:16 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,756,720 times
Reputation: 24863
I thought the auroras were caused by solar wind electrons caught in the magnetic field ionizing atmospheric gasses which them emit light as they return to ground state. Electromagnetic radiation is not effected by the magnetic field and I do not think it will ionise the gasses in the atmosphere.

Would someone clarify?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2012, 08:32 AM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,442,152 times
Reputation: 6541
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
I thought the auroras were caused by solar wind electrons caught in the magnetic field ionizing atmospheric gasses which them emit light as they return to ground state. Electromagnetic radiation is not effected by the magnetic field and I do not think it will ionise the gasses in the atmosphere.

Would someone clarify?
That is correct, and it is how energized those electrons are that determine the colors of auroras. The shorter the wave-length, the more energized the electrons become. Normally green light is common in aurora, coming from atomic oxygen. If the particles are very energetic, red and blue light may start appearing near the bottom of the auroral curtains as the particles interact with molecular nitrogen. Also the more energized the electrons, the brighter the aurora.


Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Space

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:20 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top