Quote:
Originally Posted by st33lcas3
HAHAHA! That's the same view drivers on I90 have been seeing for the last thirty years. Look at the haze in the background, it only gets worse as the summer goes on.
Traffic sucks, the roads in town are pothole infested, the local government lacks any forward thinking vision. I would never move back to Spokane and recommend anyone looking to move there, to keep looking.
kena:
Compared to other cities, Spokane does not have any traffic of note.
Have you tried going up Division from I90 to the North Division Y during rush hour? It takes 45-60 minutes to travel less than five miles. Hamilton/Nevada isn't any easier. Spokane keeps hoping for that north-south freeway, but it isn't going to happen anytime soon.
|
Some facts to add to the discussion.
For August of 2007, the same month the picture was taken, Spokane's air quality was far better than federal air quality standards every day:
http://www.spokanecleanair.org/docum...ugust%2007.pdf
As far as traffic goes, Spokane just doesn't have much traffic compared to most other metropolitan areas. In fact, it is tied for last in terms of traffic congestion among all metros included in this study
http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/mobility_report_2007.pdf (keep scrolling until you get to the bottom, it is way down the list):
National Congestion Tables
Table 1. Key Mobility Measures, 2005
Urban Area
Annual Delay per Traveler Travel Time Index Wasted Fuel per Traveler
Hours Rank Value Rank Gallons Rank
Very Large Average (14 areas) 54 1.38 38
Los Angeles-LBch-Santa Ana, CA 72 1 1.50 1 57 1
San Francisco-Oakland, CA 60 2 1.41 3 47 2
Washington, DC-VA-MD 60 2 1.37 7 43 5
Atlanta, GA 60 2 1.34 11 44 3
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 58 5 1.35 9 40 7
Houston, TX 56 7 1.36 8 42 6
Detroit, MI 54 8 1.29 21 35 10
Miami, FL 50 11 1.38 6 35 10
Phoenix, AZ 48 15 1.31 15 34 13
Chicago, IL-IN 46 16 1.47 2 32 17
New York-Newark, NY-NJ-CT 46 16 1.39 5 29 23
Boston, MA-NH-RI 46 16 1.27 25 31 19
Seattle, WA 45 19 1.30 17 34 13
Philadelphia, PA-NJ-DE-MD 38 33 1.28 23 24 34
Large Average (25 areas) 37 1.24 25
San Diego, CA 57 6 1.40 4 44 3
San Jose, CA 54 8 1.34 11 38 9
Orlando, FL 54 8 1.30 17 35 10
Denver-Aurora, CO 50 11 1.33 13 33 15
Riverside-San Bernardino, CA 49 13 1.35 9 40 7
Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL 45 20 1.28 23 28 25
Baltimore, MD 44 22 1.30 17 32 17
Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN 43 23 1.26 26 30 21
Indianapolis, IN 43 23 1.22 32 28 25
Sacramento, CA 41 27 1.32 14 30 21
Las Vegas, NV 39 29 1.30 18 27 27
San Antonio, TX 39 29 1.23 28 27 27
Portland, OR-WA 38 33 1.29 21 27 27
Columbus, OH 33 36 1.19 36 24 34
St. Louis, MO-IL 33 36 1.16 46 20 40
Virginia Beach, VA 30 42 1.18 39 20 40
Memphis, TN-MS-AR 30 42 1.13 53 16 46
Providence, RI-MA 29 44 1.16 46 17 45
Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN 27 45 1.18 39 19 42
Milwaukee, WI 19 59 1.13 53 14 52
New Orleans, LA 18 63 1.15 49 11 62
Kansas City, MO-KS 17 64 1.08 73 10 66
Pittsburgh, PA 16 67 1.09 64 9 69
Cleveland, OH 13 75 1.09 64 9 69
Buffalo, NY 11 77 1.08 73 7 76
85 Area Average 44 1.30 31
Remaining Areas
51 Urban Areas Over 250,000 Popn 22 1.15 15
301 Urban Areas Under 250,000 Popn 20 1.12 11
All 437 Urban Areas 38 1.26 26
Very Large Urban Areas—over 3 million population. Large Urban Areas—over 1 million and less than 3 million population.
Annual Delay per Traveler – Extra travel time for peak-period travel during the year divided by the number of travelers who begin a
trip during the peak period (6 to 9 a.m. and 4 to 7 p.m.). Free-flow speeds (60 mph on freeways and 35 mph on principal arterials)
are used as the comparison threshold.
Travel Time Index – The ratio of travel time in the peak period to the travel time at free-flow conditions. A value of 1.35 indicates a
20-minute free-flow trip takes 27 minutes in the peak
2005 values include the effects of operational treatments.
Note: Please do not place too much emphasis on small differences in the rankings. There may be little difference in congestion
between areas ranked (for example) 6th and 12th. The actual measure values should also be examined.
Also note: The best congestion comparisons use multi-year trends and are made between similar urban areas.
33
Table 1. Key Mobility Measures, 2005, Continued
Urban Area
Annual Delay per Traveler Travel Time Index Wasted Fuel per Traveler
Hours Rank Value Rank Gallons Rank
Medium Average (30 areas) 28 1.16 18
Austin, TX 49 13 1.31 15 33 15
Charlotte, NC-SC 45 20 1.23 28 31 19
Louisville, KY-IN 42 25 1.23 28 29 23
Tucson, AZ 42 25 1.23 28 26 31
Nashville-Davidson, TN 40 28 1.17 42 25 33
Oxnard-Ventura, CA 39 29 1.24 27 27 27
Jacksonville, FL 39 29 1.21 35 26 31
Raleigh-Durham, NC 35 35 1.18 39 23 37
Albuquerque, NM 33 36 1.17 42 21 39
Birmingham, AL 33 36 1.15 49 22 38
Bridgeport-Stamford, CT-NY 31 40 1.22 32 24 34
Salt Lake City, UT 27 45 1.19 36 18 44
Sarasota-Bradenton, FL 25 48 1.19 36 15 50
Omaha, NE-IA 25 48 1.16 46 15 50
Honolulu, HI 24 51 1.22 32 16 46
El Paso, TX-NM 24 51 1.17 42 16 46
Grand Rapids, MI 24 51 1.10 60 14 52
Allentown-Bethlehem, PA-NJ 22 55 1.14 51 14 52
Oklahoma City, OK 21 56 1.09 64 13 59
Fresno, CA 20 57 1.12 55 12 61
Richmond, VA 20 57 1.09 64 13 59
Hartford, CT 19 59 1.11 57 14 52
New Haven, CT 19 59 1.11 57 14 52
Tulsa, OK 19 59 1.09 64 11 62
Dayton, OH 17 64 1.10 60 11 62
Albany-Schenectady, NY 16 67 1.08 73 10 66
Toledo, OH-MI 15 71 1.09 64 9 69
Springfield, MA-CT 11 77 1.06 81 7 76
Akron, OH 10 80 1.07 76 7 76
Rochester, NY 10 80 1.07 76 7 76
Small Average (16 areas) 17 1.09
10
Charleston-North Charleston, SC 31 40 1.17 42 19 42
Colorado Springs, CO 27 45 1.14 51 16 46
Pensacola, FL-AL 25 48 1.11 57 14 52
Cape Coral, FL 24 51 1.12 55 14 52
Little Rock, AR 17 64 1.07 76 11 62
Boulder, CO 16 67 1.10 60 9 69
Columbia, SC 16 67 1.07 76 10 66
Eugene, OR 14 72 1.10 60 8 73
Bakersfield, CA 14 72 1.09 64 8 73
Salem, OR 14 72 1.09 64 8 73
Laredo, TX 12 76 1.09 64 6 81
Beaumont, TX 11 77 1.05 84 7 76
Anchorage, AK 10 80 1.07 76 5 83
Corpus Christi, TX 10 80 1.06 81 6 81
Brownsville, TX 8 84 1.06 81 4 85
Spokane, WA 8 84 1.04 85 5 83
85 Area Average 44 1.30 31
Remaining Areas
51 Urban Areas Over 250,000 Popn 22 1.15 15
301 Urban Areas Under 250,000 Popn 20 1.12 11
All 437 Urban Areas 38 1.26 26
Medium Urban Areas—over 500,000 and less than 1 million population. Small Urban Areas—less than 500,000 population.
Annual Delay per Traveler – Extra travel time for peak-period travel during the year divided by the number of travelers who begin a
trip during the peak period (6 to 9 a.m. and 4 to 7 p.m.). Free-flow speeds (60 mph on freeways and 35 mph on principal arterials)
are used as the comparison threshold.
Travel Time Index – The ratio of travel time in the peak period to the travel time at free-flow conditions. A value of 1.35 indicates a
20-minute free-flow trip takes 27 minutes in the peak.
2005 values include the effects of operational treatments.
Note: Please do not place too much emphasis on small differences in the rankings. There may be little difference in congestion
between areas ranked (for example) 6th and 12th. The actual measure values should also be examined.
Also note: The best congestion comparisons use multi-year trends and are made between similar urban areas.