U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive > Brand-specific forums > Subaru
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-05-2013, 01:08 PM
 
Location: Whittier, CA
494 posts, read 1,420,775 times
Reputation: 447

Advertisements

I am trying to figure out if this is a good choice for my next vehicle. I have an outdoor lifestyle - hobbies that I am regularly involved in are snowboarding (during winter I visit Southern and Central California ski resorts - 4wd is a HUGE asset), hiking (some of the trailheads are located in areas where cars do not do well - I have a truck now and that works great!), motorcycling (I intend to buy a bike and cart it to the racetrack occasionally), SCUBA (an SUV makes carting tanks and scuba gear much easier), bicycling (carting 2 bicycles is easier in an SUV with fold-down seats).

Pros:
Great gas mileage for a 250hp engine

Lots of value for $35k fully loaded (eyesight, navi etc.). This is the absolute top of my budget as I will be paying full cash for the vehicle and that is all I want to spend.

Reliability - from what I've read Subarus are quite reliable

Legendary 4WD system

Cons:
Average looks (not particularly exciting but acceptable)

Extremely low towing capacity - 1500 lbs is very borderline to tow a trailer with my motorcycle on it, if I have to put a friends motorcycle it make not be enough at all (trailer weight 400 lbs + 2 motorcycles 900 lbs = 1300 lbs is borderline!). I just cannot understand why this vehicle cannot tow at least 2000 lbs when the previous version of the Forester was rated at 2400lbs. A huge error by Subaru. This IS an outdoor SUV after all. For instance the Lexus RX350 which is much less rugged than the Subaru and whose demographic is MUCH less likely to tow is rated at 3500 lbs.

What is the competition I should be also looking at?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-05-2013, 01:20 PM
 
3,743 posts, read 10,288,806 times
Reputation: 2715
Why don't you look at a used Subaru? Get the better towing capacity and save money? Subarus are very reliable and I'd have no issues buying a used one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2013, 01:20 PM
 
Location: Holmdel, NJ
20,899 posts, read 25,970,428 times
Reputation: 12872
this makes me think of a question ive had, is it worth buying a car that has a base of 20k fully loaded for 35k or buy a car that has a base of 35k? for example, if im going to make a forester that expensive, maybe ill just get a murano or an edge (or some other 30-35k car).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2013, 01:39 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
13,350 posts, read 14,991,182 times
Reputation: 19573
None of the compact SUV/CUV are going to tow much more than 1550 lbs. The Ford Escape can tow up to 3500 lbs and the Mazda CX5 can do 2000 lbs but neither one will be as quick nor will their AWD system will be on par with Subaru if that's super important to you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2013, 04:48 PM
 
774 posts, read 1,831,464 times
Reputation: 718
We have an 09 Forester and it's been a great car. The first snow storm after buying the car we took it to an unplowed lot and let the GF play. It was her first AWD car and I wanted her to learn safely. I followed in my truck with a strap just in case.

After messing around for 20 mins we buried it in a snow drift. I sat and watched as the computer did it's thing pulsing the brakes on the spinning wheel etc until it was unstuck. I was shocked. We too have a pretty outdoors type life style and have had the Forester off the beaten path more times than I care to mention. With a slightly better set of tires and some real skid plates it would be almost as capable as my truck.

I don't know that much about the 2014 model but our 09 has been flawless. If you buy it I would look at skid plates and good tires. Otherwise it's a great car..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2013, 05:01 PM
 
Location: Woodland Park, CO
3,124 posts, read 8,552,225 times
Reputation: 2446
It's currently being discussed here: 2014 tow rating - Page 2 - Subaru Forester Owners Forum

Last post makes a good point about it being 1500kg (3300lb) on the Australia website. Could SOA have interpreted it wrong?

If I was you, I'd get a fully loaded Jeep Wrangler Unlimited for under $35k. A Wrangler is the #1 vehicle in resale value (http://www.kbb.com/new-cars/best-res...e-top-10-cars/ ... 55% after 5 years lol) You will sacrifice fuel economy but at least it doesn't require premium. But having a convertible in California is well worth it. If you have never driven a Jeep with the top off, you must do it. It's amazing how much fun a slow car can be. It can tow 3500lb.

A Wrangler will go where a Subaru could only dream


Last edited by PokerMunkee; 03-05-2013 at 05:13 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2013, 05:06 PM
Status: "Not hardly" (set 24 days ago)
 
Location: North Beach, MD on the Chesapeake
28,391 posts, read 34,365,293 times
Reputation: 34561
Can't speak for towing but one thing I've noticed in Mrs. NBP's 2010 Forester is the cargo compartment is fairly small with the rear seatbacks up.

Looks are looks, I can't tell the difference between most of the CUVs in that class.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2013, 05:20 PM
 
7,282 posts, read 7,594,620 times
Reputation: 11343
Quote:
Originally Posted by ducviloxi View Post
I am trying to figure out if this is a good choice for my next vehicle. I have an outdoor lifestyle - hobbies that I am regularly involved in are snowboarding (during winter I visit Southern and Central California ski resorts - 4wd is a HUGE asset), hiking (some of the trailheads are located in areas where cars do not do well - I have a truck now and that works great!), motorcycling (I intend to buy a bike and cart it to the racetrack occasionally), SCUBA (an SUV makes carting tanks and scuba gear much easier), bicycling (carting 2 bicycles is easier in an SUV with fold-down seats).

Pros:
Great gas mileage for a 250hp engine

Lots of value for $35k fully loaded (eyesight, navi etc.). This is the absolute top of my budget as I will be paying full cash for the vehicle and that is all I want to spend.

Reliability - from what I've read Subarus are quite reliable

Legendary 4WD system

Cons:
Average looks (not particularly exciting but acceptable)

Extremely low towing capacity - 1500 lbs is very borderline to tow a trailer with my motorcycle on it, if I have to put a friends motorcycle it make not be enough at all (trailer weight 400 lbs + 2 motorcycles 900 lbs = 1300 lbs is borderline!). I just cannot understand why this vehicle cannot tow at least 2000 lbs when the previous version of the Forester was rated at 2400lbs. A huge error by Subaru. This IS an outdoor SUV after all. For instance the Lexus RX350 which is much less rugged than the Subaru and whose demographic is MUCH less likely to tow is rated at 3500 lbs.

What is the competition I should be also looking at?
If you need 4x4 for more than snow or mud on an improved dirt road, I'd really consider the need to tow a trailer over that terrain carry anything.

A Subaru (and I really like them) is not a standard SUV and even an SUV isn't going to compare to a 4x4 truck, no matter what the towing capacity is. The Lexus, Audi, Volvo and all the upscale models/brands are nothing more than glorified station wagons that have some pseudo 4 wheel drive system.

Subarus do not have much ground clearance either when compared to trucks. There is a lot more to it than what is advertised. Check out what hits first when it hits.

Most modern SUVs belong on freeways and the occassional spin to the mountains to get you through snowy or muddy roads but not off-road, that is for TV ads.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2013, 05:35 PM
 
Location: Woodland Park, CO
3,124 posts, read 8,552,225 times
Reputation: 2446
Forester ground clearance is pretty good.

2013 Forester = 8.7"
2013 F-150 4X4 = 8.8"
2013 Silverado 4X4 = 9"
2013 Wrangler Rubicon = 10.2"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2013, 05:59 PM
 
3,743 posts, read 10,288,806 times
Reputation: 2715
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerMunkee View Post
A Wrangler will go where a Subaru could only dream
Except 100 mph...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive > Brand-specific forums > Subaru
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2017, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 - Top