Houston, San Antonio, and Austin are the #2, #3, and #4 fastest growing cities in the U.S. (Dallas: live in, plantation)

[HtownLove]

Originally Posted by dallasboi

Uhh..... it is the largest in the ENTIRE North America...So whats the problem.
The Best-Kept Secret In Texas... The Great Trinity Forest « CBS Dallas / Fort Worth

The largest what is the issue.

Largest Urban forest it is not

[dallasboi]

Originally Posted by HtownLove

The largest what is the issue.

Largest Urban forest it is not

Largest urban Hardwood Bottomland Forest in North America.

[HtownLove]

Originally Posted by dallasboi

Largest urban Hardwood Bottomland Forest in North America.

Good boy. 5 points to Hufflepuff

[kenshi]

Originally Posted by HtownLove

The largest what is the issue.

Largest Urban forest it is not

And yet you continue to offer nothing to back that up. I think the more you talk, the more people are going to be inclined to believe it is the largest.

[HtownLove]

Originally Posted by kenshi

And yet you continue to offer nothing to back that up. I think the more you talk, the more people are going to be inclined to believe it is the largest.

If you can, read back the last few pages CAREFULLY.

or better yet, get Dallasboi to explain it to ya. He got it

[Metro Matt]

Originally Posted by dallasboi

Largest urban Hardwood Bottomland Forest in North America.

That's quite a mouthful.

Dallas & forest are two words that should never be mentionond together in the same sentence.

Those trees in the "Great Trinity Forest" are nothing more than low canopy, dense under growth along the banks of the Trinity River that has accumulated over the years due to lack of development in South Dallas.

Where ever you have a body of water, you usually have vegetation along & near it.

Its not a hard concept to understand & is not representive of the typical landscape for the vast majority of D/FW & North Texas.

[HtownLove]

Originally Posted by Metro Matt

That's quite a mouthful.

Dallas & forest are two words that should never be mentionond together in the same sentence.

Those trees in the "Great Trinity Forest" are nothing more than low canopy, dense under growth

In Texas we call that brush, not a forest

Its not a hard concept to understand

seems kinda hard for some (...well one)

[dallasboi]

Originally Posted by HtownLove

In Texas we call that brush, not a forest


seems kinda hard for some (...well one)

Yall please lets not open the door to the tree battles again....That could easily be the next 20 pages of this thread..

[kenshi]

Originally Posted by HtownLove

If you can, read back the last few pages CAREFULLY.

Oh there's not enough heroin in the city of Dallas to cure the headache I'd receive from such a task. I see no point in debating this any further. You've made it quite clear that you still have no intention whatsoever of providing any evidence to support anything you say. You'd rather go on about how the trees are smaller (though more beautiful) than the ones in Houston, how only a small portion of the trees were planted, and whatever other nonsense that has little to do with what we're talking about. You can remain in your own little world of thought where there are 20 urban forests larger than ours and remain oblivious to the real world. Take your Houston lackeys with you too since they're the only ones that think your incoherent ramblings actually make a point.

[ClarenceBodiker]

Let's try to stay on track. Regardless of how big the GTF is or where it may rank in the country, it's really an irrelevant issue either way. It's a park, and you can't look at a city's density numbers and say, "well, if only we didn't have these parks." All cities have parks and land that will never be developed. They're included in density numbers.