U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Old 11-14-2012, 02:02 PM
Location: California
3,893 posts, read 4,508,788 times
Reputation: 3037


Texas can legally divide itself into five separate states. Would you support this ?
Here's a short article from 2009.

The Map Room: Texas Divided
Quick reply to this message

Old 11-14-2012, 02:44 PM
Location: Austin, TX
11,389 posts, read 26,161,415 times
Reputation: 5264
Actually, my understanding is they can't - that was a one-off thing perpetuated by urban legend. And why do that? To what advantage?

Although the provisions of the Texas Annexation document allowing
for the creation of four additional states are popularly regarded as a
unique curiosity today, they were largely superfluous. Article IV,
Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution already specifically provided for
the formation of new states through the junction or division of
existing states:
"New states may be admitted by the Congress into this union;
but no new states shall be formed or erected within the
jurisdiction of any other state; nor any state be formed by the
junction of two or more states, or parts of states, without the
consent of the legislatures of the states concerned as well as
of the Congress."
Another Texas-related legend holds that the Texans negotiated an
annexation treaty which reserved to them the right to secede from
the Union without the consent of the U.S. Congress, but the terms of
Texas' annexation contain no such provision.
From some additional reading, it appears that the civil war and abolition of slavery pretty much ended the right to split the state. The whole reason was to balance (or counter balance) free and slavery states and there were specific language limiting what areas could be slavery or had to be free.

Last edited by Trainwreck20; 11-14-2012 at 02:59 PM..
Quick reply to this message
Old 11-14-2012, 02:49 PM
Location: Willowbend/Houston
12,973 posts, read 18,663,782 times
Reputation: 9472
I wouldnt care, but I would want the map drawn differently than the one in the article.
Quick reply to this message
Old 11-14-2012, 03:52 PM
Location: San Antonio
3,057 posts, read 3,069,710 times
Reputation: 2463
I don't like being lumped in with Austin! But then again that would lead us to be put with the El Norte. EWWWWWWW!
Quick reply to this message
Old 11-14-2012, 04:35 PM
Location: Houston, TX/San Diego, CA
1,002 posts, read 1,095,123 times
Reputation: 907
Id support this more than secession. The secessionists can have Plainland.
Quick reply to this message
Old 11-14-2012, 04:43 PM
Location: The Lone Star State
8,032 posts, read 6,820,055 times
Reputation: 5029
Quick reply to this message
Old 11-14-2012, 05:28 PM
339 posts, read 324,417 times
Reputation: 380
For me the answer is no.

I happen to like the idea of ALL of Texas keeping her electoral votes away from the hard core liberal party.

As for secession, any Red state would hate to see Texas leave (unless they joined), because if they did ANY nut job liberal could easily (much easier than now) get voted into the White House assuming the electoral college method redistributes afterwards but keeps the same format. The presidental election would end up being a joke, because whoever won the nomination for being top liberal would get in every time!
Quick reply to this message
Old 11-14-2012, 05:43 PM
Location: Whereever we have our RV parked
7,698 posts, read 6,209,002 times
Reputation: 12676
I'd be all for secession, but only as a whole state. IMHO, that's the only way Texas can make it as a country, without the very strong likelihood of being absorbed. However, I think like minded states like Oklahoma and possibly Kansas may want to come along.
Quick reply to this message
Old 11-14-2012, 05:43 PM
Location: Austin, Texas
1,899 posts, read 2,446,426 times
Reputation: 1486
No. I think the Union should remain the same as it is today.
Quick reply to this message
Old 11-14-2012, 06:41 PM
Location: Austin/Houston
2,808 posts, read 3,971,419 times
Reputation: 2051
agreed. this country needs to stay united. And all the crybabies who are signing the petition supporting the states secession need to just suck it up that our president will be around for a while longer and go home.

Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.

Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply

Loading data...
Based on 2000-2013 data
Loading data...

Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2017, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 - Top