Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-01-2013, 10:31 AM
 
288 posts, read 433,926 times
Reputation: 340

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Htown2013 View Post
UT if she has any desire to leave Texas. Both are good if she plans to stay in Texas. FWIW, I hate that Texas colleges have the most liberal admissions policies in the country that strongly discriminate against parents that have worked so hard to get into a good school district that happens to be highly competitive. While many of these hardworking parents can afford to send their children to UT or A&M, they cannot afford comparably ranked out of state schools or private schools. Using a single highly relative and highly subjective admissions criteria is an insult to a student's hard work and complete picture.

With that being said, I do agree that the very top students from all schools be given a chance. No more than, say 30% of admissions be class rank - whatever rank fills 30% of capacity, be it 3%, 5%, or whatever. The remaining 70% should be traditional wholostic admissions. Admitting >75% of students based on the highly subjective class rank discriminates among the "less affluent" families who worked hard to buy into a nice area that has a strong but very competitive schools districts and their hardworking kids who fall just outside the top 10% and whom there are not spots left and the children and their families are forced to go elsewhere.
Why not UH or Texas Tech? Both are also good schools.

The problem is mostly because this state hasn't until recently pushed to get more tier one schools. We had to vote on that a few years ago. For all the bickering & rivalry between A&M and UT, they prefer to be the only highly ranked public universities in the state. Politics was played for far too long, now essentially handicapping our own state's talent. LSU & OU get their fare share of Texas kids who want to go to schools perceived as better than the two mentioned. Its a shame we'really just now pushing to get our other public universities into that tier.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-01-2013, 10:32 AM
 
Location: San Antonio
4,422 posts, read 6,259,038 times
Reputation: 5429
Quote:
Originally Posted by Htown2013 View Post
UT if she has any desire to leave Texas. Both are good if she plans to stay in Texas. FWIW, I hate that Texas colleges have the most liberal admissions policies in the country that strongly discriminate against parents that have worked so hard to get into a good school district that happens to be highly competitive. While many of these hardworking parents can afford to send their children to UT or A&M, they cannot afford comparably ranked out of state schools or private schools. Using a single highly relative and highly subjective admissions criteria is an insult to a student's hard work and complete picture.

With that being said, I do agree that the very top students from all schools be given a chance. No more than, say 30% of admissions be class rank - whatever rank fills 30% of capacity, be it 3%, 5%, or whatever. The remaining 70% should be traditional wholostic admissions. Admitting >75% of students based on the highly subjective class rank discriminates among the "less affluent" families who worked hard to buy into a nice area that has a strong but very competitive schools districts and their hardworking kids who fall just outside the top 10% and whom there are not spots left and the children and their families are forced to go elsewhere.
This. I don't know why UT guarantees admissions for anyone in the top 8% of any school, when we they are fully aware not all schools are created equal. A straight A student, only ranked in the top third from Hob Nob High, will be passed over for a low B student, who received an inferior education at South Cholo High. Not fair.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2013, 02:39 PM
 
3,491 posts, read 6,974,972 times
Reputation: 1741
I was in the top 10 percent of my class at Robert E.Lee and I had the opportunity to go to UT Austin but crazy as it seems but I had my reasons I chose Midland College.Starting out at a huge university straight out of high school is not best for everyone.So to the OP, i would suggest think long and hard about this and dont rule out junior college because she could flunk out or drop out before december if she went to UT or TAMU.

Last edited by Westerntraveler; 06-01-2013 at 02:40 PM.. Reason: remove stuff
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2013, 05:10 PM
 
Location: Austin, Texas
1,985 posts, read 3,318,930 times
Reputation: 1705
Quote:
Originally Posted by Westerntraveler View Post
I was in the top 10 percent of my class at Robert E.Lee and I had the opportunity to go to UT Austin but crazy as it seems but I had my reasons I chose Midland College.Starting out at a huge university straight out of high school is not best for everyone.So to the OP, i would suggest think long and hard about this and dont rule out junior college because she could flunk out or drop out before december if she went to UT or TAMU.
Just because they are large universities doesn't mean one can't find their niche. If you go 4 years to a large university and still feel like just a number, it's most likely your own fault.

For instance, I know UT offers FIGs, which are small study groups that take many of the same small classes together and meet every week.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2013, 05:53 PM
 
3,491 posts, read 6,974,972 times
Reputation: 1741
Quote:
Originally Posted by Austinite101 View Post
Just because they are large universities doesn't mean one can't find their niche. If you go 4 years to a large university and still feel like just a number, it's most likely your own fault.

For instance, I know UT offers FIGs, which are small study groups that take many of the same small classes together and meet every week.
Everyone is different.Some people feel lonely in 2000 student high schools.What about a person who has a learning disablity but can suceed at UT but is socially inept for lack of a better word?

Last edited by Westerntraveler; 06-01-2013 at 06:11 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2013, 06:42 PM
 
Location: Austin, Texas
1,985 posts, read 3,318,930 times
Reputation: 1705
Quote:
Originally Posted by Westerntraveler View Post
Everyone is different.Some people feel lonely in 2000 student high schools.What about a person who has a learning disablity but can suceed at UT but is socially inept for lack of a better word?
Notice I said most likely. If you want to feel like more than just a number, you can join clubs, form a study groups, volunteer, get to know your professors, intern, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2013, 07:16 PM
 
3,491 posts, read 6,974,972 times
Reputation: 1741
Quote:
Originally Posted by Austinite101 View Post
Notice I said most likely. If you want to feel like more than just a number, you can join clubs, form a study groups, volunteer, get to know your professors, intern, etc.
I know most likely but I see where youre coming from.I always get attached to my professors so I can see your point.No hard feelings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2013, 08:01 PM
 
Location: North Texas
24,561 posts, read 40,285,459 times
Reputation: 28564
Quote:
Originally Posted by thenewtexan View Post
This. I don't know why UT guarantees admissions for anyone in the top 8% of any school, when we they are fully aware not all schools are created equal. A straight A student, only ranked in the top third from Hob Nob High, will be passed over for a low B student, who received an inferior education at South Cholo High. Not fair.
Texas House Bill 588 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hopwood v. Texas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2013, 08:58 PM
 
Location: Denver
4,716 posts, read 8,576,941 times
Reputation: 5957
Short Answer: In Texas, they're basically equals. In the rest of the world, UT has more recognition.

What kind of atmosphere does she want? What are her interests?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2013, 07:55 AM
 
1,915 posts, read 3,240,851 times
Reputation: 1589
Quote:
Originally Posted by thenewtexan View Post
This. I don't know why UT guarantees admissions for anyone in the top 8% of any school, when we they are fully aware not all schools are created equal. A straight A student, only ranked in the top third from Hob Nob High, will be passed over for a low B student, who received an inferior education at South Cholo High. Not fair.
THIS. This is completely unfair for a 11% ranked at a school like Clements in Sugar Land who both the student and parents worked very hars vs a person ranked 8% at a small school with little competition. This is completely unfair. That being said, the very best students from the poor districts should have a shot, but limit it to 25 or 30% of class size (that may be top 3% or whatever) but not fill the entire class with the highly subjective class rank. If the policies were changed, UT and other Texas Universities could be even more powerhouses.

I'm just very surprised that Texas has the most liberal college admissions policies in the entire country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:53 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top