Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which Choice Best Describes Your Feelings on Captial Punishment?
Yes. I am absolutely in favor. Sometimes it is only justice 33 46.48%
Never. It is too extreme no matter the circumstances 11 15.49%
Yes, however. (explain if desired) 6 8.45%
No, but. (explain if desired) 3 4.23%
I prefer life without parole, but only if it could be guaranteed no-escape, and hard labor time. 7 9.86%
Life Without Parole as it is. 11 15.49%
Not sure/No Opinion 0 0%
Other (please explain) 0 0%
Voters: 71. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-20-2013, 09:34 PM
 
Location: Central Texas
20,958 posts, read 45,404,950 times
Reputation: 24745

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicken_of_Bristol View Post
Yes, however.....it is used WAY too often in Texas.

It should be reserved for the worst of the worst, only. In Texas, it is basically a general punishment.

We should be more like Japan in our use of capital punishment.

Not really. Here's the statute regarding what qualifies for the death penalty in Texas, Capital Murder:

Sec. 19.03. CAPITAL MURDER. (a) A person commits an offense if the person commits murder as defined under Section 19.02(b)(1) and:
(1) the person murders a peace officer or fireman who is acting in the lawful discharge of an official duty and who the person knows is a peace officer or fireman;
(2) the person intentionally commits the murder in the course of committing or attempting to commit kidnapping, burglary, robbery, aggravated sexual assault, arson, obstruction or retaliation, or terroristic threat under Section 22.07(a)(1), (3), (4), (5), or (6);
(3) the person commits the murder for remuneration or the promise of remuneration or employs another to commit the murder for remuneration or the promise of remuneration;
(4) the person commits the murder while escaping or attempting to escape from a penal institution;
(5) the person, while incarcerated in a penal institution, murders another:
(A) who is employed in the operation of the penal institution; or
(B) with the intent to establish, maintain, or participate in a combination or in the profits of a combination;
(6) the person:
(A) while incarcerated for an offense under this section or Section 19.02, murders another; or
(B) while serving a sentence of life imprisonment or a term of 99 years for an offense under Section 20.04, 22.021, or 29.03, murders another;
(7) the person murders more than one person:
(A) during the same criminal transaction; or
(B) during different criminal transactions but the murders are committed pursuant to the same scheme or course of conduct;
(8) the person murders an individual under 10 years of age; or
(9) the person murders another person in retaliation for or on account of the service or status of the other person as a judge or justice of the supreme court, the court of criminal appeals, a court of appeals, a district court, a criminal district court, a constitutional county court, a statutory county court, a justice court, or a municipal court.
(b) An offense under this section is a capital felony.
(c) If the jury or, when authorized by law, the judge does not find beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of an offense under this section, he may be convicted of murder or of any other lesser included offense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-20-2013, 09:51 PM
 
Location: Slaughter Creek, Travis County
1,194 posts, read 3,975,125 times
Reputation: 977
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobTex View Post
I voted "Yes, however"

My however is to be as follows:

--- executions should be public (televised is OK to accommodate the masses but there should be a large present audience)

--- especially heinous crimes deserve especially slow and painful deaths (the Apaches had some excellent methodologies)

--- victim's families should have the option to initiate punishment

--- last but not least is expedited appeals process so that execution must occur within 6 months of sentencing.
Texas is not very good at jurisprudence. Between former Williamson County DA Ken Anderson withholding evidence on a case overturned after an innocent man spending 20 years in prison, the Dallas County DA working to overturn wrong convictions, and the still undecided but highly contested death of Todd Willingham, our State needs to set the bar much higher before execution occurs.

Frankly the DAs in this state have way too much power and zero accountability.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2013, 09:53 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
15,269 posts, read 35,637,527 times
Reputation: 8617
In a perfect law system, then I would favor it; however, given the chance for errors, I have a hard time really getting behind it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2013, 10:09 PM
 
Location: Oklahoma
577 posts, read 512,448 times
Reputation: 470
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobTex View Post
I voted "Yes, however"

My however is to be as follows:

--- executions should be public (televised is OK to accommodate the masses but there should be a large present audience)

--- especially heinous crimes deserve especially slow and painful deaths (the Apaches had some excellent methodologies)

--- victim's families should have the option to initiate punishment

--- last but not least is expedited appeals process so that execution must occur within 6 months of sentencing.
I hope your conditions for execution were a joke. I would hate to see that type of behavior here. It reminds me of something seen in a third world country, very uncivilized.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2013, 12:19 AM
 
519 posts, read 777,174 times
Reputation: 965
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctk0p7 View Post
I hope your conditions for execution were a joke. I would hate to see that type of behavior here. It reminds me of something seen in a third world country, very uncivilized.
I was thinking the same thing. Coupled with the other goofball's idea of inmates only being allowed to read books of a religious nature (heh) and we're starting to sound like Iran.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2013, 05:54 AM
 
235 posts, read 360,353 times
Reputation: 149
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasHorseLady View Post
Not really. Here's the statute regarding what qualifies for the death penalty in Texas, Capital Murder:

Sec. 19.03. CAPITAL MURDER. (a) A person commits an offense if the person commits murder as defined under Section 19.02(b)(1) and:
(1) the person murders a peace officer or fireman who is acting in the lawful discharge of an official duty and who the person knows is a peace officer or fireman;
(2) the person intentionally commits the murder in the course of committing or attempting to commit kidnapping, burglary, robbery, aggravated sexual assault, arson, obstruction or retaliation, or terroristic threat under Section 22.07(a)(1), (3), (4), (5), or (6);
(3) the person commits the murder for remuneration or the promise of remuneration or employs another to commit the murder for remuneration or the promise of remuneration;
(4) the person commits the murder while escaping or attempting to escape from a penal institution;
(5) the person, while incarcerated in a penal institution, murders another:
(A) who is employed in the operation of the penal institution; or
(B) with the intent to establish, maintain, or participate in a combination or in the profits of a combination;
(6) the person:
(A) while incarcerated for an offense under this section or Section 19.02, murders another; or
(B) while serving a sentence of life imprisonment or a term of 99 years for an offense under Section 20.04, 22.021, or 29.03, murders another;
(7) the person murders more than one person:
(A) during the same criminal transaction; or
(B) during different criminal transactions but the murders are committed pursuant to the same scheme or course of conduct;
(8) the person murders an individual under 10 years of age; or
(9) the person murders another person in retaliation for or on account of the service or status of the other person as a judge or justice of the supreme court, the court of criminal appeals, a court of appeals, a district court, a criminal district court, a constitutional county court, a statutory county court, a justice court, or a municipal court.
(b) An offense under this section is a capital felony.
(c) If the jury or, when authorized by law, the judge does not find beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of an offense under this section, he may be convicted of murder or of any other lesser included offense.
I know the law.

Regardless, it is used WAY too often. And the fact that this state kills more people than any other is proof of that. Section 19.03(a)(2) is far too broad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2013, 05:55 AM
 
235 posts, read 360,353 times
Reputation: 149
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctk0p7 View Post
I hope your conditions for execution were a joke. I would hate to see that type of behavior here. It reminds me of something seen in a third world country, very uncivilized.
To many Americans, Texas is the US's "third world country."

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2013, 06:00 AM
 
Location: Republic of Texas
988 posts, read 1,203,566 times
Reputation: 707
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicken_of_Bristol View Post
I know the law.

Regardless, it is used WAY too often. And the fact that this state kills more people than any other is proof of that. Section 19.03(a)(2) is far too broad.
How is Section 19.03(a)(2) too broad?

Message to criminals: Don't commit murder or you will fry. Pretty concise to me.

If we use the death penalty way too often, I'd say that we have a murder problem, not a judicial problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2013, 06:02 AM
 
Location: Republic of Texas
988 posts, read 1,203,566 times
Reputation: 707
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicken_of_Bristol View Post
To many Americans, Texas is the US's "third world country."

Those aren't real Americans. Those are gutless pathetic husks that merely occupy lands that could technically be classified as "America", but in reality are soviet socialist states. Talk about third world, yeesh

Texas is the real America. Get with the program.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2013, 07:14 AM
 
Location: East Texas, with the Clan of the Cave Bear
3,266 posts, read 5,633,404 times
Reputation: 4763
Quote:
Originally Posted by car957 View Post
Texas is not very good at jurisprudence. Between former Williamson County DA Ken Anderson withholding evidence on a case overturned after an innocent man spending 20 years in prison, the Dallas County DA working to overturn wrong convictions, and the still undecided but highly contested death of Todd Willingham, our State needs to set the bar much higher before execution occurs.

Frankly the DAs in this state have way too much power and zero accountability.
All this is covered by an appeals process and judgement by a jury of our peers who are much more privy to information that the "public". DA's are accountable to the voting public! Granted this is not immediate accountability!

This Dallas County person (you said DA but I feel you may mean this judge) whom you are championing , is it District Judge Larry Mitchell?

The Innocence Project - Know the Cases: Browse Profiles:Johnnie Lindsey

'No justice for Justice' in tortured dog case | wfaa.com Dallas - Fort Worth



To those that question whether my original post is serious, I am "dead" serious !
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:31 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top