Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-27-2018, 08:02 PM
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
2,511 posts, read 2,212,124 times
Reputation: 3785

Advertisements

Excellent point. It could have been worse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-30-2018, 02:49 PM
 
Location: Unplugged from the matrix
4,754 posts, read 2,972,766 times
Reputation: 5126
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spade View Post
I didn't say "slowist". I said "slowish" because it slowed down compared to previous years but it's still higher than all other metros not named Dallas-Fort Worth.

Even slowish is incorrect because it was still the second fastest growing metro area. You're right in saying it slowed down compared to the boom.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top