Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-25-2008, 01:37 PM
 
Location: DFW, TX
2,935 posts, read 6,714,065 times
Reputation: 572

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danilo-11 View Post
I'm not arguing where it comes,
I'm arguing your argument that "electricity cannot be cheaper than its source fuel"
If that's the case, why is it that all factories use electric motors instead of coal or gas motors?
Economies of scale. If your core business is energy and you purchase 100,000 tons of coal per day, you get a better price than a business who would purchase 50 tons per day. Not to mention the cost of regulatory compliance... which is much cheaper for larger companies than point solutions.

You will see more companies embrace wind and solar where they are effective and once the cost of generation comes closer to that of natural gas and coal, or when consumers put a higher value on goods produced by "green" companies and are willing to offset the cost of higher energy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-25-2008, 03:46 PM
 
3,853 posts, read 12,862,680 times
Reputation: 2529
Quote:
Originally Posted by changeofpace View Post
Mass Transit, buses, light rail, Amtrak and high speed rail are all subsidized by the taxpayer. They are services provided to move people and are considered part of the infrastructure. Soon air travel will also be subsidized by tax payers. Not sure how much more tax payers can absorb and are willing to pay for when you consider all the highways and byways that also need repair and upgrading.
Well that sure sucks. I guess gas prices are still cheap compared to other forms of transportation. So I guess this idea is a ways off. But still would be cool. I would probably live in waco/temple/fort hood if I could take the train.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2008, 04:58 PM
 
4,604 posts, read 8,228,191 times
Reputation: 1266
I've taken the Amtrak between Austin and Dallas, one year ago. It was an okay train, clean, pleasant. But the schedule was slow. The Amtrak on that route does NOT take the right of way so has to stop and wait for freight trains to pass by. Some waits were in excess of twenty minutes. And there were many. The route does not even go into Waco but stops in McGregor, ten miles away.

I've grown weary of long drives around Texas. I would certainly use a high speed train if available.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2008, 12:13 PM
 
Location: DFW Texas
3,127 posts, read 7,626,733 times
Reputation: 2256
If it means that I wouldnt have to drive, fly or take Greyhound, I AM ALL FOR IT!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2008, 08:28 AM
 
3,247 posts, read 9,047,348 times
Reputation: 1526
I really think Houston to San Antonio should be a vital link because its creates almost a third major port of knowledge in the US. Mexico via Sa to H town
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2008, 09:03 AM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,810,437 times
Reputation: 18304
If you look at the airlne studies then high speed trains from houston to dallas makes sense, But they don't seem to support much in the austin and san antonio area which is why they don't have good airline service in both cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2008, 02:55 PM
 
5,760 posts, read 11,540,611 times
Reputation: 4949
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucidus View Post
There are other factors involved besides the price per unit of energy, like pollution, availability, logistics, etc. Electricity is a generally useful and convenient enough to be worth the added expense over direct consumption of fossil fuels.
Hey guys, here is the real math. Although most trains in the US are driven by DC motor axles, the electric power that drives them is generated by on an on-board diesel generator. Diesel generators put out only 1/6. to 1/3 of the energy in electricity as they consume in diesel fuel -- so they are very lossy.

In Texas sources for electric driven trains include local existing nuke, local existing coal plants, gas (more expensive), and newer wind and solar thermal generation. Overall it would be cheaper to run the trains from grid power, but the electric distribution has not (yet?) been built for that -- so on with on-board diesel generators we go.

Mostly a money thing and a case of whether The Powers That Be continue to think short term or shift to long term thinking.

As far as the high speed electric passenger rail coming to Texas, the limiting factor is not finance, nor available power, nor demand -- that is all here. The present limiting factor is SouthWest Airlines -- they lobby (bribe) BIG TIME in Austin to keep it from happening.

So for now it continues to be $$$ for SWA, and F U Texas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2008, 03:37 PM
 
134 posts, read 326,133 times
Reputation: 83
My understanding is that there was a plan in place in the early 1990's and Southwest Airlines killed it because they flooded the state legislature with campaign donations. So if it wasn't for that bribery, we would already have a system.

Anyway, I find it really hilarious when people complain about the frankly minimal amount of money we subsidize mass transit with in this country but have zero problem with the billions we spend on roads, streets, and highways. Your fuel taxes don't pay for all of that people.

Also, we are increasingly subsidizing the airline industry. Just watch; the next government bailout will cover the airlines. It has happened before.

And despite all this, their service keeps getting worse and worse (probably will make you pay for the seatbelt next) and yet our government protects them from outside competition. Foreign airlines would love to be able to come into the US and compete on domestic routes (for example British Airways) but they are banned because of their political power and their lobbying. A joke.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2008, 01:24 AM
 
3,853 posts, read 12,862,680 times
Reputation: 2529
Quote:
Originally Posted by jd2008 View Post
My understanding is that there was a plan in place in the early 1990's and Southwest Airlines killed it because they flooded the state legislature with campaign donations. So if it wasn't for that bribery, we would already have a system.

Anyway, I find it really hilarious when people complain about the frankly minimal amount of money we subsidize mass transit with in this country but have zero problem with the billions we spend on roads, streets, and highways. Your fuel taxes don't pay for all of that people.

Also, we are increasingly subsidizing the airline industry. Just watch; the next government bailout will cover the airlines. It has happened before.

And despite all this, their service keeps getting worse and worse (probably will make you pay for the seatbelt next) and yet our government protects them from outside competition. Foreign airlines would love to be able to come into the US and compete on domestic routes (for example British Airways) but they are banned because of their political power and their lobbying. A joke.
Haha no kidding. I just saw something in the news about automakers getting bonds

Quote:
By as early as next spring, U.S. automakers will be able to tap into a $25 billion low-interest line of credit from the government to help them modernize their plants to build more fuel-efficient vehicle
Federal loans to automakers could flow in 6 months - NewsFlash - mlive.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2008, 08:28 AM
 
1 posts, read 1,846 times
Reputation: 10
Default Solar Powered Maglev

The energy part is easy, actually.
Start by encouraging small businesses for people with trucks and trailers to gather up all the junk cars and appliances scattered all over Texas and taking them to steel recycling centers. Grind them up, melt it and make standard size steel parts for carports.
Design the carports so they will be high enough to cover RVs and manufactured (mobile) homes.
Build elevated concrete Maglev train tracks 20 feet above and along Hwy 290 (The Independence Trail) between Austin and Houston. Design the tracks to be for light rail and/or maybe light freight to relieve the strain on the Interstates.
Develop retirement communities and RV resorts near the new commuter rail lines and rural communities with good hospitals and municipal airports.
Design the retirement communities and RV resorts as solar power powered distributed generators and incorporate the roofs of the carports with thin-film photovoltaics and put all the excess gigawatts of solar energy into the new high-temperature super-conducting power transmission lines that are incorporated into the elevated railways.
Sell stock in the companies involved and let the young workers invest in mutual funds they can draw from when they retire into a community they built for 40 years with their 401K.

See, I told you it would be easy. Remember the marketing angle of this being along the "Texas Independence Trail".

Doing this will create thousands of jobs and save billions of dollars in social security. It recycles and reduces carbon emissions. It will pull seniors out of crumbling inner cities and allow the next generation of workers to come in and rehab whole downtown projects.

It will also help bring new technology to the market place by giving it a high visibility application.

How many retirees in Texas would like to move out of the city and relax? Millions!
How many Winter Texans come down from the north every winter? Hundreds of thousands!

Don't forget about the summer jobs for students at colleges near the tracks such as UT, A&M, U of H, Rice, Blinn, San Jac, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:53 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top