U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Closed Thread


 
Old 09-18-2009, 07:38 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Houston, Texas
2,076 posts, read 823,607 times
Reputation: 336
Angel713 is a jewel in the roughAngel713 is a jewel in the roughAngel713 is a jewel in the roughAngel713 is a jewel in the roughAngel713 is a jewel in the roughAngel713 is a jewel in the roughAngel713 is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweethomeSanAntonio View Post
Those figures are not correct census figures for San Antonio.

My figures are correct, I'm using census statistics. San Antonio had 1,324,000 in 1990 and 1,592,000 in 2000 and 2,031,884 in 2008. Going by these figures San Antonio out paced Austin metro between 2000-2008. Austin slowed down between 2000 and 2008. But Austin did out pace San Antonio between 1990 and 2008 overall. I'm estimating urbanized area by lastest census estimates based on population within an area. San Antonio basically has well over 500,000 more in i'ts core.
Just so you will know a lil about me, I picked up my first world atlas in my play pin at age 1, someone must have left it in there by mistake, there begin my love affair with maps and almanacs, never put them down since then, of course my hot wheels as well.
Uh, yes they are correct Census figures. They comes straight from the Census if you look at the link. Texas A&M just compiled the numbers. Yours are wrong. What was the story for? LOL. You can estimate urban areas all you want, but those only comes out every ten years. Urban areas have to have a certain density throughout.

And no imaterry, SA is NOT way larger than Austin.
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-18-2009, 08:16 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Houston, Texas
2,076 posts, read 823,607 times
Reputation: 336
Angel713 is a jewel in the roughAngel713 is a jewel in the roughAngel713 is a jewel in the roughAngel713 is a jewel in the roughAngel713 is a jewel in the roughAngel713 is a jewel in the roughAngel713 is a jewel in the rough
Do you know how I know your numbers are really wrong? I looked at Houston's. There is no way Houston was that small in 2000. No way.

Houston: CensusScope -- Population Growth

That, and they have Dallas and Fort Worth split up. SA was NOT that small in 2000. That site is wrong. Hell, go look at the Wikipedia chart, with their references. I'll even link you: Table of United States Metropolitan Statistical Areas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2009, 09:02 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
900 posts, read 645,470 times
Reputation: 150
SweethomeSanAntonio has a spectacular aura aboutSweethomeSanAntonio has a spectacular aura aboutSweethomeSanAntonio has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angel713 View Post
Uh, yes they are correct Census figures. They comes straight from the Census if you look at the link. Texas A&M just compiled the numbers. Yours are wrong. What was the story for? LOL. You can estimate urban areas all you want, but those only comes out every ten years. Urban areas have to have a certain density throughout.

And no imaterry, SA is NOT way larger than Austin.
OMG the stats are in front of your face, shows the larger numerical gain, for County, City and Metro from 2000- to 2008. As far as urbanized area San Antonio had 427k more and now more than likely 500k, it may not be the ten year stats, just a estimate.

500,000 more people is like adding another good sized city. I really wouldn't say, way.... larger, just considerably larger, surely not equal or near equal in size. It is easy, just drive around both places, just comparing freeway infrastructure, built up area pretty much tells the story.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2009, 09:09 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
900 posts, read 645,470 times
Reputation: 150
SweethomeSanAntonio has a spectacular aura aboutSweethomeSanAntonio has a spectacular aura aboutSweethomeSanAntonio has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angel713 View Post
Do you know how I know your numbers are really wrong? I looked at Houston's. There is no way Houston was that small in 2000. No way.

Houston: CensusScope -- Population Growth

That, and they have Dallas and Fort Worth split up. SA was NOT that small in 2000. That site is wrong. Hell, go look at the Wikipedia chart, with their references. I'll even link you: Table of United States Metropolitan Statistical Areas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


I saw that, it must be a adjustment back dating the 2000 and 1990 census, since the territory was adjusted. San Antonio was 1.324 million 1990 and 1.592 in 2000. Going by that adjustment would throw the figures off.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2009, 09:18 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Houston, Texas
2,076 posts, read 823,607 times
Reputation: 336
Angel713 is a jewel in the roughAngel713 is a jewel in the roughAngel713 is a jewel in the roughAngel713 is a jewel in the roughAngel713 is a jewel in the roughAngel713 is a jewel in the roughAngel713 is a jewel in the rough
^^so, what would you say on Houston's WAY OFF numbers? Houston didn't add counties that would boost it's 2000 numbers that high. Therefore, your site is messed up.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SweethomeSanAntonio View Post
OMG the stats are in front of your face, shows the larger numerical gain, for County, City and Metro from 2000- to 2008. As far as urbanized area San Antonio had 427k more and now more than likely 500k, it may not be the ten year stats, just a estimate.

500,000 more people is like adding another good sized city. I really wouldn't say, way.... larger, just considerably larger, surely not equal or near equal in size. It is easy, just drive around both places, just comparing freeway infrastructure, built up area pretty much tells the story.
Haha, what?? I posted the stats that even show international and domestic migration, as well as births and deaths. What did you show? You can even go to county and state on the link I posted. Mine come from the Census. Your site's numbers are all over the place.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2009, 09:21 AM
Retired Slacker
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Austin, TX
4,239 posts, read 4,699,439 times
Reputation: 712
Trainwreck20 is a splendid one to beholdTrainwreck20 is a splendid one to beholdTrainwreck20 is a splendid one to beholdTrainwreck20 is a splendid one to beholdTrainwreck20 is a splendid one to beholdTrainwreck20 is a splendid one to beholdTrainwreck20 is a splendid one to beholdTrainwreck20 is a splendid one to beholdTrainwreck20 is a splendid one to beholdTrainwreck20 is a splendid one to beholdTrainwreck20 is a splendid one to beholdTrainwreck20 is a splendid one to beholdTrainwreck20 is a splendid one to behold
Original topic long since abandoned....
__________________
TrainWreck
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Closed Thread


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:27 AM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top