Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-17-2010, 04:20 PM
 
Location: A little suburb of Houston
3,702 posts, read 18,207,814 times
Reputation: 2092

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bowie View Post
Couple of educated guesses...

They're so desparate for money that they're willing to look past the unfunded mandates.

Their governors are members of the President's party, which means they either support the mandates or they fear the internal partisan backlash that would result from not accepting the money.
What Bowie said + the lemming factor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-17-2010, 06:51 PM
 
Location: New London County, CT
8,949 posts, read 12,130,345 times
Reputation: 5145
Default Hypocracy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bowie View Post
Their governors are members of the President's party, which means they either support the mandates or they fear the internal partisan backlash that would result from not accepting the money.
Or perhaps governors who aren't members of the President's party are so concerned about a partisan backlash...

Cuts both ways.

Again, I ask, doesn't the $700 Mil fund the mandates in the bill? I know we're going to go to some ridiculous extreme about what the mandates would require Texas to do...

I don't hear anyone screaming about the unfunded mandates in No Child Left Behind... I guess if it comes from a republican it's automatically good and not part of the big-bad-federal government encroachment. If it comes from a democrat.... You know the rest...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2010, 10:05 PM
 
18,123 posts, read 25,262,858 times
Reputation: 16822
Quote:
Originally Posted by mlassoff View Post
I don't hear anyone screaming about the unfunded mandates in No Child Left Behind... I guess if it comes from a republican it's automatically good and not part of the big-bad-federal government encroachment. If it comes from a democrat.... You know the rest...
That's exactly my point
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2010, 12:07 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,810,437 times
Reputation: 18304
Yep;the stimulus money come with too many strings and a losss of control to the federal government.The string amount to future large increases in taxes plus the control.The feel are from ;long experience in fedewral amndates so popular with teh demopcrats;not an illusion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2010, 12:09 PM
 
Location: Where I live.
9,191 posts, read 21,867,276 times
Reputation: 4934
Quote:
Originally Posted by mlassoff View Post
Or perhaps governors who aren't members of the President's party are so concerned about a partisan backlash...

Cuts both ways.

Again, I ask, doesn't the $700 Mil fund the mandates in the bill? I know we're going to go to some ridiculous extreme about what the mandates would require Texas to do...

I don't hear anyone screaming about the unfunded mandates in No Child Left Behind... I guess if it comes from a republican it's automatically good and not part of the big-bad-federal government encroachment. If it comes from a democrat.... You know the rest...
Wanna bet? NCLB was a piece of crap, and was heavily pushed/partly designed by none other than good ole liberal dem Teddy.

Having said that, the Bush administration was just stupid to agree to it and sign off on it. Once they did, it was, "Oh, look at the great educational thing that we passed during my administration, et al.."

BARF!!!

Neither party has a monopoly on greed, stupidity, pork or gross deficit spending, period.

Throw ALL the bums out and start over!

But Perry was right to refuse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2010, 01:10 PM
 
1,148 posts, read 2,779,224 times
Reputation: 639
Four states refused the money. Governors of those states include Perry, Palin, Stanford and one other whose name escapes me.
This is playing politics with childrens lives and is despicable. You think its a coincidence that these 3 people had Presidential aspirations? 46 states including those run by Republicans had no problem with the oversight included with the money.

Also what kind of educational standards is the State of Texas preserving? Texas ranks what 40th out of 50 states in public education? #49 in verbal SAT scores and #46 in math SAT scores.

Last edited by orbius; 01-18-2010 at 01:38 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2010, 01:58 PM
 
Location: A little suburb of Houston
3,702 posts, read 18,207,814 times
Reputation: 2092
Quote:
Originally Posted by orbius View Post
Four states refused the money. Governors of those states include Perry, Palin, Stanford and one other whose name escapes me.
This is playing politics with childrens lives and is despicable. You think its a coincidence that these 3 people had Presidential aspirations? 46 states including those run by Republicans had no problem with the oversight included with the money.

Also what kind of educational standards is the State of Texas preserving? Texas ranks what 40th out of 50 states in public education? #49 in verbal SAT scores and #46 in math SAT scores.
Seems that your one of the folks who I described in an earlier post who looks at the $700 million like it is alot of money when in reality it is not. Look at the operating budgets of Texas school districts. The money would not have a great effect and the mandates attached to it would in all likelyhood increase costs quite bit beyond the original proferred money and would increase costs in perpetuity. Where would that money come from? As to the problems in Texas schools...well throwing money at a situation does not necessarily resolve it. Look at Haiti for a prime example of that. I don't believe that the madates would greatly effect the problem either. They are just an excuse to go forward with the first step in federalizing schools.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2010, 02:08 PM
 
Location: Charleston Sc and Western NC
9,273 posts, read 26,484,606 times
Reputation: 4741
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poltracker View Post
They are just an excuse to go forward with the first step in federalizing schools.

exactly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2010, 02:12 PM
 
1,148 posts, read 2,779,224 times
Reputation: 639
Whats wrong with setting basic standards of education at a Federal level? If States are failing their students why shouldnt the Federal government be able to work with states and help change things? 49th in verbal SAT scores and 46th in Math scores are not what I consider good value for money for my huge property tax bill. I thought Republicans were hungry for educational standards and accountability? So now just because they happen to be coming from a federal level they balk? Obviously the reason some teacher groups are siding with Perry is that they're concerned the substandard teachers amongst them might be fired if standards are enforced.
Pride cometh before the fall and Texas seems to run solely on the stuff sometimes.

Last edited by orbius; 01-18-2010 at 02:21 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2010, 02:28 PM
 
Location: Charleston Sc and Western NC
9,273 posts, read 26,484,606 times
Reputation: 4741
What's wrong with Federal Education? Considering the bang-up job they do running the show, I don't think they need to be involved in education, which is under the STATE's Governing Power. Not to mention a Federal Curriculum with Federal/Partisan Points of View of Social and Historical events being the only information available to children. Federal Education is socialist, and I think this country and most of it's citizens don't want that.

While education is very poor, a supreme power mandating what ALL it's youth learn seems rather frightening. Texas needs to get rid of the TAKS, pay the better teacher MORE,fire the bad ones, be damned those stupid unions, and pay more to better teacher who take on troubled districts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:06 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top