|

06-15-2007, 05:11 PM
|
|
Moderator
Status:
"Nice and chilly!"
(set 15 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: from houstoner to bostoner ;)
3,724 posts, read 3,002,857 times
Reputation: 1325
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lakewooder
Can you elucidate us further?
|
Yeah, because I don't know about that... Neiman Marcus was started in Dallas in the early 1900's and Dallas is easily the fashion capital of Texas (uh-oh, hope mpope doesn't get me for saying that). I'm not aware of any fashion school in Houston at that time. Maybe you're confusing Neiman Marcus with some other Texas-based retailer, like Sanger Harris, Foley's, or Sakowitz, and have the details mixed up?
|
|

06-15-2007, 06:29 PM
|
|
Not a member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Texas
2,703 posts
Reputation: 206
|
|
|
I probably am. I am just going off with what my sister told me today (said she saw it on TV).
|
|

06-15-2007, 06:30 PM
|
|
Not a member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Texas
2,703 posts
Reputation: 206
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lakewooder
I see the pope left Dallas off..hmm what a surprise!
I would say:
1. Lakewood
2. East Dallas
3. North Oak Cliff
4. Downtown Dallas
5. Uptown/Turtle Creek/Oak Lawn
|
Last time I checked, Dallas was in the Metroplex.
|
|

06-15-2007, 07:23 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In God
3,076 posts, read 3,829,203 times
Reputation: 320
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lakewooder
I see the pope left Dallas off..hmm what a surprise!
I would say:
1. Lakewood
2. East Dallas
3. North Oak Cliff
4. Downtown Dallas
5. Uptown/Turtle Creek/Oak Lawn
|
Actually, Dallas is included in #2...or do you not know your own area?
Quote:
1. Houston
2. Metroplex/North Texas
3. San Antonio
4. Austin
5. Centroplex
|
|
|

06-15-2007, 07:25 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In God
3,076 posts, read 3,829,203 times
Reputation: 320
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by houstoner
Neiman Marcus was started in Dallas in the early 1900's and Dallas is easily the fashion capital of Texas (uh-oh, hope mpope doesn't get me for saying that).
|
Lol, I really can't argue with that...doesn't mean that won't change, though.
|
|

06-16-2007, 10:31 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
1,985 posts, read 1,774,224 times
Reputation: 395
|
|
|
San Antonio is the next Texas Super Super mega city, It would probably get there faster if Austin would combine their metros together like DFW. SA area is only about 30 miles from Austin suburbs. San Antonio will boom to over 2 mil city proper and 3in metro area within the next 10 years
|
|

06-16-2007, 01:56 PM
|
|
Not a member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Texas
2,703 posts
Reputation: 206
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by imaterry78259
San Antonio is the next Texas Super Super mega city, It would probably get there faster if Austin would combine their metros together like DFW. SA area is only about 30 miles from Austin suburbs. San Antonio will boom to over 2 mil city proper and 3in metro area within the next 10 years
|
HA! No it won't. SA actually grew by less than 300,000 since 2000 (actually, slower than Austin). The Census put it at 1.9 million at the beginning of this year. In ten years, SA may be at 2.5 million. Austin may be just 200,000 behind it. For city proper, it will be awhile before SA gets up to two million.
|
|

06-16-2007, 05:23 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Washington D.C. by way of Texas. Maybe Chicago next year
4,690 posts, read 2,744,073 times
Reputation: 1032
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by imaterry78259
San Antonio is the next Texas Super Super mega city, It would probably get there faster if Austin would combine their metros together like DFW. SA area is only about 30 miles from Austin suburbs. San Antonio will boom to over 2 mil city proper and 3in metro area within the next 10 years
|
San Antonio will not be a mega city much less a super mega city for a while. And just because you merge with Austin does not mean it is like DFW. Dallas Ft. Worth is about 50 miles closer downtown to downtown than San Antonio and Austin. Personally, you should never hope that happens because all it is ugly sprawl between the two cities. Besides, Austin seems to want to grow North anyway.
|
|

06-16-2007, 05:42 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Washington D.C. by way of Texas. Maybe Chicago next year
4,690 posts, read 2,744,073 times
Reputation: 1032
|
|
|
Oh and this is my answer to this question
1.Houston/Dallas (these two cities will remain tied at number 1 because they each excel at different things than the other. The area surrounding Dallas including the states of Oklahoma to as far south as Waco to as far east as Shreveport and so on and so on. Houston will dominate to as far east as Lake Charles and west towards San Antonio and so on).
2.Austin
3. San Antonio
4. The Rest
There really is no point in naming other cities. Maybe El Paso, the Valley, and the South Plains but that's about it. Economically, it will be irrelevant compared to the top big cities in the state as of now.
|
|

06-16-2007, 05:48 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In God
3,076 posts, read 3,829,203 times
Reputation: 320
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spade
1.Houston/Dallas (these two cities will remain tied at number 1...
|
Not forever.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|