Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive > Brand-specific forums > Toyota, Lexus, and Scion
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-31-2013, 09:54 AM
 
Location: Rio
551 posts, read 1,121,924 times
Reputation: 190

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by family first View Post
All things considered which makes for a better motor for this vehicle? Anyone know the actual mileage for the 6 vs. the 4 cyl. engines. Is the 4 capable enough for driving in all types of road conditions? Anyone that has these would help me make the decision on a purchase. Thanks
A V4 engine is only for fuel economy. V6 gets you better performance that people want.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-31-2013, 09:56 AM
 
Location: NY
9,130 posts, read 20,012,483 times
Reputation: 11707
Quote:
Originally Posted by lokewolf View Post
lets change the vehicle and pose the same question comparing a Toyota Tacoma 4x4 4cyl vs 6cyl.

I had a 98, then a 2009 tacoma 4cyl 4x4, both Manual tranny. I would get 22combined and 24-26hwy. My neighbor had a 09 4cyl 4x4 then got a 2011 4x4 v6 manual and isn't doing much better than my current 2011 tundra v8 4.6L (16combined/18-20hwy) So what is the difference between those highlanders and those tacomas? Those 4 bangers get good MPG's

based on 24 vs 18 mpg at 300 miles traveled at fillup, that's a 16 gal difference for the month, that's $50-60 worth of money per month you could be saving with the 4 banger. $600-$720 extra for 6cyl per year.

Now we all know I'm not comparing apples to apples (manual vs Auto tranny's) and gas prices are not the same from one place to another, but that is a significant difference in cost these days.
That may make the 4 banger worth it in the Tacoma for someone who is not towing, or frequently hauling heavy loads. Even if the 4 bangers can and will tow or haul some heavy loads, if your doing a lot of mountains or doing it frequently your increasing the strain and doing it far slower. Not something all would want. Use plays a big part here.

However, I am not sure that is too applicable to the Highlander since the EPA mileage figures are much closer (2 MPG difference) and in general that seems supported by Fuelly reports (V6's mostly ranging 19-22, 4 bangers mostly ranging 21-24).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2013, 10:05 AM
 
Location: Twin Lakes /Taconic / Salisbury
2,256 posts, read 4,497,126 times
Reputation: 1869
Quote:
Originally Posted by AstonMartinNY View Post
A V4 engine is only for fuel economy. V6 gets you better performance that people want.

Its an I 4 not a V 4. V4s are not very common.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2013, 10:19 AM
 
22 posts, read 49,015 times
Reputation: 18
Auto makers are or will be offering more 4 banger models/versions in there future lineups...according to a statement from FORD. The trend away from fuel economy is like a boomerang...you'll start to see more 4cyl offerings as auto makers try to meet the 2025 deadline established by BUSH.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2013, 10:31 AM
 
Location: Rio
551 posts, read 1,121,924 times
Reputation: 190
Quote:
Originally Posted by LRPct View Post
Its an I 4 not a V 4. V4s are not very common.
ok, ill take the correction.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2013, 11:08 AM
 
Location: Bergen County, Nazi Jerky
367 posts, read 960,073 times
Reputation: 463
Quote:
Originally Posted by family first View Post
All things considered which makes for a better motor for this vehicle? Anyone know the actual mileage for the 6 vs. the 4 cyl. engines. Is the 4 capable enough for driving in all types of road conditions? Anyone that has these would help me make the decision on a purchase. Thanks
I think it will depend on where and how you drive. I have two geriatric Camrys, a '93 V6 and a '94 I4. In congested eastern Bergen County New Jersey the difference is negligible. Truth be told, in every day driving I can't tell the difference. The cost to replace the valve cover gaskets, the rear one being a real pain, on the V6 was not negligible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2013, 11:18 AM
 
Location: Central Texas
13,714 posts, read 31,173,187 times
Reputation: 9270
Quote:
Originally Posted by DFBonnett View Post
I think it will depend on where and how you drive. I have two geriatric Camrys, a '93 V6 and a '94 I4. In congested eastern Bergen County New Jersey the difference is negligible. Truth be told, in every day driving I can't tell the difference. The cost to replace the valve cover gaskets, the rear one being a real pain, on the V6 was not negligible.
Your Camrys weigh 1000 lbs less. Your example is not really relevant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2013, 11:25 AM
 
Location: Central Texas
13,714 posts, read 31,173,187 times
Reputation: 9270
Quote:
Originally Posted by lokewolf View Post
Auto makers are or will be offering more 4 banger models/versions in there future lineups...according to a statement from FORD. The trend away from fuel economy is like a boomerang...you'll start to see more 4cyl offerings as auto makers try to meet the 2025 deadline established by BUSH.
Not sure why you are trying to make this a political issue. But Bush's change to the CAFE standard had a 35MPG target for 2020. More recent changes to the CAFE standard, pushed and approved by Obama, raise the target to 54.5 MPG in 2025.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2013, 11:27 AM
 
Location: Central Texas
13,714 posts, read 31,173,187 times
Reputation: 9270
Quote:
Originally Posted by LRPct View Post
Its an I 4 not a V 4. V4s are not very common.
I do not think there are any V4 cars on the road today. They are extremely rare.

V4 motorcycles are not so unusual. Honda used this configuration for some time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2013, 11:29 AM
 
Location: NYC
90 posts, read 203,188 times
Reputation: 46
Get the V6. There is a huge difference driving the i4 vs the V6 Rav4 (same V6 engine as the Highlander) and the Rav4 weighs 500lbs less. The i4 Rav4 always seems to struggle a bit while the V6 you feel you always have a good amount of power in reserve for passing etc. In addition to that you have to consider that you cannot get AWD on the i4.

Anyway I suggest you take a test drive of both version. I think it will be an easy decision.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive > Brand-specific forums > Toyota, Lexus, and Scion
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:19 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top