Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Travel
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-09-2013, 09:13 AM
 
Location: Coos Bay, Oregon
7,138 posts, read 11,030,239 times
Reputation: 7808

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by crone View Post
Back when I traveled by rail a lot, passenger trains had to pull off to wait on the freight trains, which had the right of way. Probably freight still has the ROW.
Passenger trains have the right of way over freight trains, but they still have to wait their turn. Most rail road ROW is single track. Amtrak can't use the track, until the oncoming trains clear it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-09-2013, 03:17 PM
 
23,974 posts, read 15,082,290 times
Reputation: 12952
One of these years I'm going to get one of my math smart grandsons to calculate the amount of public (tax) money spent on passenger mlles for freeways, airplanes, roads and trains. Might be an interesting number to know.

Somebody figured out if we put the cost the DOD and the State department spent on protecting oil, gasoline would be 15 dollars a gallon.

I don't know how much we subsidize airlines and airports and air traffic controllers, yada, yada. Maybe if it were possible to even come up with a number, the folks gripping about Amtrak subsidies would calm down.

IMO, the thing that hurt passenger rail was when the post office stopped putting the mail on passenger trains.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2013, 06:04 PM
 
Location: On the Rails in Northern NJ
12,380 posts, read 26,853,319 times
Reputation: 4581
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mistermobile View Post
Are US passenger trains like all the movies we have seen, clean, traveling through scenic places, interesting people with great meals in the dining car?

Something tells me no.
Yes , the Meals are cooked onboard and range from burgers to steak with wild rice , depending on the route. Out West you get serviced Wine from the Cali Vineyards...the trains to New Orleans have Southern foods like Freshly made pecan pie or fresh seafood dishes , the trains in the Northeast have fast food , however they are moving towards regional foods like seafood dishes , Fresh Jersey cranberries , Philly Cheesesteaks , New York or New Haven Pizza...etc. Trains are clean and Climate control isn't all over the place. You meet a wild range of interesting people onboard , retirees , students , families , artists , musicians...etc...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2013, 06:50 PM
 
1,458 posts, read 2,659,026 times
Reputation: 3147
We just took the Auto Train to Florida. My husband, myself and our two small kids used two roomettes. We'll do it again, and book a family bedroom next time.

The dining car was fun. I very much enjoyed the land zipping by... and I detest what airports have become.

I also take commuter rail to work 5 days a week (SEPTA Regional Rail.) I'm a train person.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2013, 11:41 PM
 
Location: Great Falls, VA
771 posts, read 1,459,566 times
Reputation: 1302
I often take Amtrak to travel to NYC for work and I love it (I live in Dulles, VA). It's fast and efficient and, in my opinion, much better than driving, flying or taking a bus.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2013, 01:05 PM
 
Location: Berwick, Penna.
16,215 posts, read 11,335,819 times
Reputation: 20828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesky View Post
I often take Amtrak to travel to NYC for work and I love it (I live in Dulles, VA). It's fast and efficient and, in my opinion, much better than driving, flying or taking a bus.
I think the point which needs to be stressed here is that Amtrak works very well, in those locations where it has both the population density and infrastructural capacity to sustain itself. Unfortunately, that scenario is more often the exception than the rule.

Amtrak works very well in the Boston-New York-Washington Corridor, despite a few bottlenecks such as the North (Hudson) River tunnels and the necessity for reduced speeds at Philadelphia and Baltimore. The popularity of extensions to Portland (ME), Richmond, and Norfolk has been another pleasant suprise. But the New York-Buffalo service is practical only as far as Albany. Beyond there, the railroad was reduced from four tracks to two in the late Fifties by predecessor New York Central and while the grading is still intact, relaying the track and installing the traffic control needed to accommodate both passengers and freight traffic, which has been growing steadily since around 1985, would be expensive. The electrical catenary (overhead wiring) between New York and New Haven is also outdated.

Outside the Corridors, the handful of long-distance "cruise ships", including the AutoTrain, are sustained only at the behest of influential politicians. The late Senators Frank Moss (D-UT), Mike Mansfield (D-MT) and Representative Bud Shuster (R-Altoona, PA) were grand masters at this "art".

California is probably the most vexing case of all. Los Angeles-San Diego and Oakland-Bakersfield (a hub for feeder bus services to all of the Southland) have been gaining patronage for years. but breaking a number of bottlenecks in between for a continuous statewide service will also be very expensive. However, it appears that recent commitments to intermediate stages of a "true" High Speed Rail network are likely to be a "point of no return", and Warren Buffet's Burlington Northern / Santa Fe would gain considerable benefit, in the form of a parallel freight line under its own control rather than the present sharing of trackage rights from landlord (and competitor) Union Pacific if a joint partnership could evolve.

But in any case, the redevelopment of the American passenger train of necessity involves very long lead times, and will be driven primarily by the certainty of shortened supplies and increased costs of fossil fuel. It simply is too complicated, and too capital-intensive to be affected by short-term changes in consumer preference.

Last edited by 2nd trick op; 08-11-2013 at 01:31 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-13-2013, 02:36 PM
 
Location: Lancashire, England
2,518 posts, read 5,357,099 times
Reputation: 7093
I took Amtrak from Chicago to White Sulphur Springs WV; daylight broke as were passing through NE Kentucky and the fall scenery between Charleston and White Sulphur Springs was wonderful, the train ran parallel to the New River for much of the time. Then we stopped at Hinton WV for a 20-minute break so I ran round town taking photos. I've also travelled between Portland and Seattle a couple of times, again they were enjoyable journeys because of the scenery, and Bridgeport CT to St Johnsbury VT. Great ways to pass through parts of the US I would never see otherwise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2013, 10:45 PM
 
Location: Vancouver
18,504 posts, read 15,555,283 times
Reputation: 11937
Via Rail is Canada's national passenger service that crosses the country and Rocky Mountaineer is a private company that specializes in of course, the Rocky Mountains. The type of food service depends on the line and length of the trip, dining cars are used through the Rockies I believe.


Best Vacations in the World: Rocky Mountaineer - YouTube


VIA Rail Business Class Experience Plus The New Panorama Lounge - YouTube

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B844LBV4ECk
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2013, 11:44 AM
 
19 posts, read 40,765 times
Reputation: 21
I love traveling by train, which I've done mostly in the Western US. I'm going to be taking the Cresent from New Orleans to DC soon - I am trying to find out where to park my car for a week but not having any luck. That's the biggest problem for me, the nearest Amtrak station is 300 miles, gotta drive to get there but then I need a place to leave my car. Years ago there was talk about a new Amtrak route going through my town but nothing ever came of it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2013, 12:55 PM
 
19 posts, read 40,765 times
Reputation: 21
This thread got me to thinking about something I don't understand. When you book an Amtrak ride, at least online, you book a coach seat and then you can add a roomette. If you're going to pay for a roomette, why do you need the coach seat? Why do you have to buy both?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Travel

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:10 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top