U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > True Crime
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Why did judge Perry recess court for the entire day?
Possible miss-trial 2 12.50%
possible plea agreement 1 6.25%
Lawyer may be in trouble on deffense or prosecution team 2 12.50%
Issue with the jury or a specific member of the jury 0 0%
Issue with a member of Casey Anthony's family 2 12.50%
Other 1 6.25%
I dont know 8 50.00%
Voters: 16. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-25-2011, 01:07 PM
 
Location: Ohio
13,900 posts, read 10,812,414 times
Reputation: 7242

Advertisements

Today { saturday } Judge perry mysteriously recessed court and sealed the discussion that took place in chambers.........your theories as to why this happened?????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-25-2011, 01:14 PM
 
Location: Ohio
13,900 posts, read 10,812,414 times
Reputation: 7242
I selected I dont know, but I really dont think it could be a plea agreement for the simple fact that the lawyers came fully prepared to try this case today

Why would the lawyers be discussing and debating the semantics of one particular witness this morning if an agreement was already in the works???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2011, 01:33 PM
 
218 posts, read 111,908 times
Reputation: 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper 88 View Post
I selected I dont know, but I really dont think it could be a plea agreement for the simple fact that the lawyers came fully prepared to try this case today

Why would the lawyers be discussing and debating the semantics of one particular witness this morning if an agreement was already in the works???

I haven't had time to watch any of the trial on TV until just a few minutes ago. I heard a fragment of conversation by the talking heads about a Brady violation by the prosecution. I'm guessing that they are having an off-camera in chambers hearing regarding that issue. A Brady violation is when the prosecution does not turn over exculpatory evidence to the defense. The prosecution is required to turn over everything during discovery; if the prosecution had any information which would have been helpful to the defense but did not turn that over to the defense (the defense doesn't have to ask for it legally) it can require a new trial. Of course, I just heard a fragment of a conversation, so I'm not at all sure that's what's going on.

Well, I just found this information. Seems like the in chambers hearing is not related to these issues, so who knows. It could be anything.
http://www.clickorlando.com/news/28355538/detail.html

Last edited by workingwithpain; 06-25-2011 at 01:50 PM.. Reason: updating
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2011, 01:59 PM
 
18,852 posts, read 31,788,273 times
Reputation: 26120
No one knows.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2011, 02:22 PM
 
218 posts, read 111,908 times
Reputation: 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by jasper12 View Post
No one knows.
TV folks are still speculating. One personality just said that a person close to the case indicated that it is a problem with an attorney, not Baez. I'm thinking there is a huge problem with the prosecution attorney having made contact with the boss of a defense witness which resulted in the defense witness not testifying and having his job threatened. That attorney is Jeff Ashton.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2011, 03:12 PM
 
18,852 posts, read 31,788,273 times
Reputation: 26120
I think the goal of the "defense" is to stretch this "trial" into as much Bozo BS as they can, and get jurors to go crazy and want out--slam dunk, mis-trial. That seems to be their new defense strategy, because they don't have anything else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2011, 05:39 PM
 
Location: Ohio
13,900 posts, read 10,812,414 times
Reputation: 7242
the way I hear it everyone is being very tight lipped about all this.... guess we wont know anything until monday though I did hear that monday was a holiday of some sort {?} and there will be no court. so we may not know anything until as late as tuesday morning.

I feal sorry for the jurors.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2011, 05:44 PM
 
25,956 posts, read 39,258,552 times
Reputation: 13935
Only the lawyers know..we can all just guess.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2011, 11:51 PM
 
3,173 posts, read 3,083,322 times
Reputation: 3699
I had thought that maybe they came up with the proof that Cindy had lied about being at work on the day of the searches but that is probably just wishful thinking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2011, 05:37 AM
 
25,956 posts, read 39,258,552 times
Reputation: 13935
Quote:
Originally Posted by mag32gie View Post
I had thought that maybe they came up with the proof that Cindy had lied about being at work on the day of the searches but that is probably just wishful thinking.
No that part is very true...either way she lied...she either lied on the time sheet or that she did the searches...

IMO she lied on the searches since she had claimed not to have a "myspace" account...and in between the searches the myspace account was used...

Bye Cindy's lying testimony.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > True Crime
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top