U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > True Crime
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
 
 
Old 11-18-2012, 08:35 PM
 
1,769 posts, read 1,088,422 times
Reputation: 2215

Advertisements

I was captivated by the OJ trial when it was happening and watched all the testimony and the one thing that i thought of was this. Think of how great you would have to be to kill Ron and Nicole and 'set up' the evidence so that not only did OJ look guilty, but he looked guilty as sin? Is anyone really THAT GOOD as to be able to frame someone this well and kind of get away with it (ya know, assuming that it wasnt really OJ)?

Also, when you think of the MODE of killing, such a messy 'personal' killing, anyone who was a 'stranger' who killed Nicole and Ron might have been a little smarter and just used a gun with a silencer.

Next May we're going to see OJ again in front of a judge, he might actually get off and get released, if he was actually offered a plea deal, he's already served that plea time, they might let him free, i dont know the ins and outs of law like this, but just the fact that they're going to 'listen' to this argument bodes well for OJ.
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-18-2012, 10:15 PM
 
46,035 posts, read 51,074,400 times
Reputation: 15526
Yep'I didn't buy that grand conspiracy so suddeny setup between police and lab techs. The blod was there';its just was a stupid jury and the civil trial showed that.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2012, 08:40 AM
 
Location: Las Flores, Orange County, CA
26,362 posts, read 58,831,860 times
Reputation: 16544
Documentary: Serial killer, not O.J., killed Simpson and Goldman - CNN.com
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2012, 10:43 AM
 
Location: California
2,067 posts, read 6,133,647 times
Reputation: 2872
I watched the entire OJ trial. There is no doubt in my mind he was guilty of murdering two innocent people.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2012, 04:08 PM
 
18,867 posts, read 17,650,795 times
Reputation: 25104
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beth56 View Post
I watched the entire OJ trial. There is no doubt in my mind he was guilty of murdering two innocent people.
I was in LA then, it was right after the Rodney King riots. The place was a powder keg. Then the OJ trial was about a year later...I Watched the trial on "Court TV". Nancy Grace was commenting on the trial. I was pretty sure he had done it. Anyone who watched the film of the white Surburban going around LA knew it.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2012, 07:05 PM
 
2,087 posts, read 1,967,972 times
Reputation: 2135
the one thing above all that saved OJ is previous to the trial there was an earthquake that damaged the courthouse in the area (rich, white, Brentwood) that the trial should've been in, thus the trial had to be moved to LA county , thus 9 blacks, 1 hispanic, and 2 elderly whites were the jurors.


if they could've had that trial where it took place like normal (of his rich white peers) he would've fried.

it's the one fact everyone forgets............ a damned California earthquake damaging a courthouse if really what saved his butt
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2012, 09:25 PM
 
1,850 posts, read 3,516,232 times
Reputation: 1100

I watched this tonight. It sure makes you wonder.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2012, 10:42 AM
 
Location: California
2,067 posts, read 6,133,647 times
Reputation: 2872
Quote:
Originally Posted by artemis View Post
I watched this tonight. It sure makes you wonder.
It doesn't make me wonder at all. Through the years there have been many criminals who have confessed to something they did not do. OJ did it. He had the motive, and he had the hate and jealousy to kill those two in such a horrific manner. No doubt in my mind at all.

Oh how the media likes to drum up this stuff.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2012, 03:45 PM
 
562 posts, read 381,634 times
Reputation: 634
I read this and thought it was not entirely implausible. Of course, if OJ hired him to steal the earrings and "kill her if necessary" he would still be guilty of murder. Could they obtain the pin to see if Nicole ever did indeed own it? And were the earring ever stolen? Remember OJ "hired" some goons to assist him in his hotel heist. He seems like the kind of person to pay people to do his dirty work.

I'm not saying I think the crime really went down this way, just that it's plausible. And if he was nearby it would make sense that he walked over when there was a scuffle-- thus leaving his footprints.

Has anyone looked into the 70 women this guy claimed to have killed?
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2012, 01:34 AM
 
Location: S.A., Texas ~ Home of the HUD secretary farm~
101,713 posts, read 28,505,472 times
Reputation: 139208
Not a chance in hell!
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $94,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > True Crime

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2015, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 - Top