Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > True Crime
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-17-2017, 01:37 PM
 
67 posts, read 40,083 times
Reputation: 96

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ClaraC View Post
It sounds like you believe - for whatever reason - Scott purposely lied about what outfit Laci was wearing.

So what I'd like to ask is, how does that help his case?

How would giving a different outfit description than than the one she was wearing (when he left, or when he killed her) help?
Exactly! How does it serve Scott in any way to lie about what Laci was wearing?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-17-2017, 01:39 PM
 
Location: Lewes, Delaware
3,490 posts, read 3,790,658 times
Reputation: 1953
Dog Trailing

So the judge includes in evidence the dog that smelled Laci at the marina, but won't let the dog that sniffed Laci around her neighborhood, lol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2017, 01:44 PM
 
Location: Lewes, Delaware
3,490 posts, read 3,790,658 times
Reputation: 1953
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClaraC View Post
So the Martha Stewart show.

Scott said when he left, Laci was watching Martha Stewart. The detective asked what the topic was, and he said something about meringue. In court, the prosecution said they'd reviewed the video and there was no mention of meringue.

Geragos got up, and played a portion of the show he'd obtained from the producer, and there was a part about meringue. Embarrassing for the prosecution. Like, someone couldn't watch an hour long show and listen for a discussion of meringue down there at headquarters?

So. What are the odds that Scott killed Laci, was making preparations to dispose of her body, and then he watches Martha Stewart?

There are those who will say so he would be able to tell the detective that Laci was alive and well.

But really. To mastermind the murder with that level of detail, you'd think he could come up with a better plan than to dump her remains where he said he was that day.

Inside the Peterson Courtroom with Greta! | Fox News
If he was framed, and that's a big if, the entire country knew he was in the San Francisco bay that day, it would have been easy to frame him. Again the media screwed this case from the start.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2017, 01:50 PM
 
9,153 posts, read 9,484,502 times
Reputation: 14039
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomenclature View Post
Exactly! How does it serve Scott in any way to lie about what Laci was wearing?
The only thing I can think is if he saw a pregnant woman in black pants in the park as he was leaving that morning. The best lie is one that has some facts to support it, so I suppose he could have remembered seeing another preg woman and described her when asked about Laci's attire. Of course this is pure speculation. But it would be a good reason to lie.

If you click on this map and then click on the bird's eye view you can get a good idea of how the land lays. The black dot is the Peterson residence.

https://www.zillow.com/homes/523-covena,-modesto-ca_rb/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2017, 01:57 PM
 
26,660 posts, read 13,730,981 times
Reputation: 19118
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lieneke View Post
The dog was not in the Medina yard. The dog was found on the street and put into the back yard before the Medina couple left their house for vacation.

The timeline for the dog being placed in the yard is supported with receipts.

Sorry, the street adjacent to the Medinas driveway.

RUSSELL GRAYBILL
Weird that the Peterson's dog didn't bark at the mailman that day. A dog who the mailman has stated has a history of getting out of his yard and being confrontational towards him didn't even bark even though he had to have been in the yard according to the official timeline.

Quote:
The neighborhood's mail carrier, recalled* that the Peterson's dog would sometimes get out
of the backyard and, being territorial, interfere with mail delivery to the Peterson's home.
Graybill did not recall the dog bothering him on December 24, 2002, when Laci disappeared.

Graybill said he, too, noticed nothing odd, adding that dogs were barking at him as usual. Every dog,
he said, except for the Petersons' golden retriever, McKenzie, who did not bark as he usually does.
The mail carrier was there between 10:35 and 10:50 that day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2017, 02:09 PM
 
Location: Lewes, Delaware
3,490 posts, read 3,790,658 times
Reputation: 1953
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomenclature View Post
Exactly! How does it serve Scott in any way to lie about what Laci was wearing?
Right, she could of changed her clothes anyway, besides my wife just went to the store, I have no idea what she was wearing.

This is such a great thread, I don't really see anyone being ignorant or mean to other posters differeing opinions on what happened. Seeing an adult conversation on this forum is rare.

The question I guess should be is there enough here or anywhere to have the case appealed? My guess is no, no one wants to admit mistakes were made, or that the trial was unfair.

I would love to see what Greg Jackson ( the original Foreman) had to say about this whole thing. He has all the notes. Maybe if he really thought Scott was railroaded he'd speak up, it could be his silence is deafening, since he was one who allegedly thought Scott was innocent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2017, 02:11 PM
 
164 posts, read 129,531 times
Reputation: 164
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissTerri View Post
Weird that the Peterson's dog didn't bark at the mailman that day. A dog who the mailman has stated has a history of getting out of his yard and being confrontational towards him didn't even bark even though he had to have been in the yard according to the official timeline.



The mail carrier was there between 10:35 and 10:50 that day.
You've left some details out. The mail carrier's testimony was that McKenzie would bark if he/she was out in the front yard, and that only happened if the gate was open.

When Graybill arrived, McKenzie was in the backyard, by him/herself, and the gate was closed.

Last edited by ohyesidid; 09-17-2017 at 02:26 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2017, 02:15 PM
 
67 posts, read 40,083 times
Reputation: 96
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lieneke View Post
I haven't read anything to support the claim that she knew about the boat. Do you have a link for that quote?
This was pointed out a week ago, post #1122. Read the testimony from Det. Brocchini. Peggy O'Donnell saw Laci at the warehouse sometime between the 20th and 23rd.

Now, if you'd like to try and make a reasonable argument that Laci being physically present at the warehouse doesn't necessarily mean she actually saw/knew about the boat, be my guest. You're only throwing your own credibility out the window, as we would all then have to believe that Scott deliberately took Laci to his warehouse for some inescapable reason, where he was storing a boat he didn't want her to know about, and apparently didn't open the bay door or allow her to see inside at all. It's a ridiculous notion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2017, 02:15 PM
 
26,660 posts, read 13,730,981 times
Reputation: 19118
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohyesidid View Post
You've left some details out. The mail carrier's testimony was that McKenzie would bark if he/she was out in the front yard, and that only happened if the gate was open and the Petersons were outside, too.

When Graybill arrived, McKenzie was in the backyard, by him/herself, and the gate was closed.
link?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2017, 02:23 PM
 
164 posts, read 129,531 times
Reputation: 164
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomenclature View Post
Exactly! How does it serve Scott in any way to lie about what Laci was wearing?
Scott lied about many things, some lies served him well temporarily, others just didn't make sense.

Isn't it correct Laci was seen in black pants and white top at the spa on the 23rd before changing and going to the salon? Perhaps, he was recollecting what she wore the morning before if she wasn't even alive and dressed on the 24th.
If Scott killed Laci on the evening of the 23rd when she was wearing cream colored Capri pants, he wouldn't want to say she was wearing the same pants the next morning since that would be an obvious clue that she likely didn't even undress on the evening of the 23rd.

Remember, Scott didn't expect Laci to ever be found, which is why he didn't have a problem proving he was at the Berkeley Marina, or saying she was wearing black pants and a white t-shirt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > True Crime
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:43 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top