Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I don't know how accurate it is, but I remember seeing somewhere that a surprising number of spouses are murdered when they're pregnant. I guess a lot of men don't want that responsibility nor the responsibility of paying child support if they divorce the wife.
I don't know how accurate it is, but I remember seeing somewhere that a surprising number of spouses are murdered when they're pregnant. I guess a lot of men don't want that responsibility nor the responsibility of paying child support if they divorce the wife.
Yes was shocked to hear that too...there was a case in the 80's in Boston area when a couple leaving a child birth class were both shot...pregnant wife was shot and killed husband minor injuries...turned out husband committed crime and killed himself before arrest...
Bottom line they couldn't prove beyond a reasonable doubt HOW he killed her or IF he killed her,
It was basically a "Oh he's a pathological liar, he cheated on his wife who was killed". It still HAS to be proven. Sorry,,
I don't know if he killed her or not. Certain reports say saw her walking her dog when she was supposed to be dead.
The legal point is, you have TO PROVE BEYOND A RESONABLE DOUBT the defendant killed the victim. And the prosecution DID NOT prove it. It sucks trusting your life in the hands of 12 jurors who vote on their EMOTIONS NOT FACTS,
Just because one commits infidelity doesn't make them a murderer. You gotta prove they killed. He was just emotionless. Some people Are. Thats human nature. People with things in their own ways. Once again, doesn't make you a murderer.
OK.. boat anchors? People use them when they fish. He cheated? Ok... Lots of husbands cheat.. Not condoning it. Doesn't make them a murderer.. Looking up tides? People do that when they fish
Unless you were sitting on that jury, there is no definitive way to know that they proved it or didn't. The jury found him guilty.
I think its also worth noting that Soctt had no history of violent tendencies in any way shape or form in the past. In many ways it was a mis-trial. The prosecution couldn't PROVE he did anything... other than cheat. And there was no evidence of a history of violence to anyone. Generally violent people as adults, have some kind of history to violence when they were kids to themselves or other people, to kids, or animals. He was more like a wussy mama's boy.
I think if Scott did do anything, he probably paid someone to do it. But again.. No proof
My sister-in-law's brother killed his wife, choking her with his bare hands. There was NO evidence of violence prior to that, or since. Ever. He, like Scott, snapped and killed the person that was the problem.
Yes was shocked to hear that too...there was a case in the 80's in Boston area when a couple leaving a child birth class were both shot...pregnant wife was shot and killed husband minor injuries...turned out husband committed crime and killed himself before arrest...
Yes was shocked to hear that too...there was a case in the 80's in Boston area when a couple leaving a child birth class were both shot...pregnant wife was shot and killed husband minor injuries...turned out husband committed crime and killed himself before arrest...
The husbands name was Charles stewart I was in boston when that happened and all of us were saying how fishy that was . He threw hisself off the bridge and drowned . His brother was a piece of crap and he should have told on him .
The husbands name was Charles stewart I was in boston when that happened and all of us were saying how fishy that was . He threw hisself off the bridge and drowned . His brother was a piece of crap and he should have told on him .
Actually, his brother did tell on him. That's ultimately how the case was solved, and what drove Stuart to commit suicide.
I remember that case. Didn't he say they were attacked by a black guy(s)?
Yep. He sure did.
Even picked a man from a lineup. Willie Bennett.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
