U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > True Crime
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-06-2012, 05:05 PM
 
Location: Northeast
1,887 posts, read 1,797,386 times
Reputation: 3740

Advertisements

Today's big news in MA, another sick bastard caught, yet should have been put away years ago. Our legal system at it's finest..
A long post, yet a worthy read..



A Wakefield mom whose son was tutored at an illegal day care where more than a dozen children may have been sexually abused says she checked out the proprietors' background and found no red flags.
On Thursday afternoon, news spread quickly through the region about the indictment of a Wakefield couple for numerous charges stemming from an illegal day care operation where graphic child sexual abuse occurred and was even recorded.

Woman's Son Was Tutored There for Two Years
John and Marian Burbine were the proprietors of Waterfall Education Center, which offered tutoring and day care to children in numerous area towns. The Middlesex County District Attorney's office alleges that at least 13 children were abused there while under the care of John Burbine, 49.
During his Thursday press conference, District Attorney Gerry Leone noted that allegations had come up against John Burbine in both 2005 and 2009, but that the complaints were deemed not prosecutable at the time. Leone also reported John Burbine had a 1989 conviction for indecent assault and battery and was classified as a Level 1 sex offender the category for those deemed least likely to re-offend as a result.
After reading our story about the Burbines a Wakefield woman called Patch. She reported she had looked into Waterfall Education Center two years ago when she first brought her son there for tutoring services. The woman, who asked that her name not be used, indicated that her son is not thought to be one of the victims in the case. Still, she asked for anonymity to protect the identity of her child.
The local mother said she did not see Burbine on the sex offender registry and that she had seen Marian Burbine's teaching credentials and was satisfied.
This summer the Mass. Department of Children and Families showed up at her home to interview her child as part of the investigation into the Burbines. The woman reported that she inquired with the Wakefield Police and was told that under state law, there was nothing they could have told her. The state's sex offender database displays only the offenders judged most likely to re-offend, the "Level 3" offenders. John Burbine's crimes put him at the less serious "Level 1."

'Kind of Creepy'
During the conversation, the woman indicated that a tutor from the business was assigned to her son, and that during the occasional sick day, Marian Burbine would "just slide" John Burbine in as a last-minute replacement. At his press conference, Leone noted that much of the alleged abuse occurred at the homes of the victims, although this woman said that she would bring her son to the Waterfall's Lincoln Street office for his tutoring - while either she or her husband waited. She also believes that her son was tutored by John Burbine only once during the two year period.
The woman also indicated that she found John Burbine from the start to be "kind of creepy," and generally very quiet around her and her husband. Still, she added that she was not trying to look into his background because of any specific suspicion.
"We were just checking because anyone that interacts with our kid, we want to be sure they were on the up and up," she told Wakefield Patch. She added that her impression of Marian Burbine was of being "a little flaky," "rather meek," and possibly like she was trying to run her first business. She added that John Burbine originally worked downstairs in the office space distributing Shaklee products and that his work space later merged with his wife's.
Overall though, this parent's main concern is the fact that John Burbine spent so much time under the radar, only to emerge facing dozens of child sex abuse charges.
"The thing that upsets me most about this whole sex offender registry is... he was lumped in with people who urinate in public. He was still allowed to be with kids," she said.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-11-2012, 11:12 AM
 
7,112 posts, read 9,367,961 times
Reputation: 8162
So what's thr answer? Did the guy somehow get his record expunged?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2012, 03:29 PM
 
1,617 posts, read 2,468,595 times
Reputation: 1352
Sometimes, I have learned/found that offenders who are supposed to be on the registry, for whatever reason, well, they are not put into the registry in a timely manner.

My friend's young son was sexually assaulted, at knife-point, and it took just about 2 years to get his name into the registry.

I do not know if it is because of additional work that the individual who enters the information into the registry has to do; I do not know if it is based on fiscal issues; I do not know if it is an Agency of Human Services job to do or DOC [Department of Corrections] - perhaps it varies from state to state.

All I know is that when someone is convicted of a sexual assault and/or pleads to a sexual assault, and are sentenced, that the day they are released to probation and parole, that is the day they should be entered into the registry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2012, 03:21 AM
 
13,612 posts, read 10,331,559 times
Reputation: 17659
Quoted from above

The woman also indicated that she found John Burbine from the start to be "kind of creepy," and generally very quiet around her and her husband. Still, she added that she was not trying to look into his background because of any specific suspicion.
"We were just checking because anyone that interacts with our kid, we want to be sure they were on the up and up," she told Wakefield Patch.


Classic example of not trusting your own instincts. If someone gives you the creeps, don't rationalize yourself out of that gut feeling. Get the hell away from that person as soon as possible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2012, 07:14 PM
 
18,852 posts, read 31,777,758 times
Reputation: 26119
Learned the hard way, you can't trust anyone with your kids.

I think many sex offenders never get caught or reported. For one to actually have been charged and convicted, he probably did it a 100 times where he got away with it.

And, once a sex offender, always a sex offender. I believe these people are wired wrong. I am sure, people will find obscure offenders, not likely to re offend. But, most of them will re offend.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > True Crime
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top