U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > True Crime
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-04-2013, 12:38 AM
 
Location: Somewhere out there
491 posts, read 316,808 times
Reputation: 86

Advertisements

This thread is for posting any interesting, unusual, or entertaining court cases from any level of the judicaial system - municipal court all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

My initial entry falls squarely into the two latter criteria - an entertaining U.S. Supreme Court case from 1986. The court declined to grant certiorari(they voted to NOT hear the case) for Clark vs. Florida.

Bret Clark was a law student who was cited for speeding on a freeway in Florida. He contested the ticket and lost, and then appealed.

You can read the court's analysis for more details. The case is completely hilarious - I was laughing while reading every word!

FindLaw | Cases and Codes

Some highlights from the above opinion - LOL!

Quote:
The merits of this appeal are utterly frivolous, as were most of appellant's persistent efforts in the courts of Florida ...

The State emphasized that appellant's motion for recall of mandate
"demonstrates a startling ignorance of the law, and, more importantly, an unwillingness to expend even minimal effort [475 U.S. 1134 , 1136] to research facts or law before taking the time of this counsel and this honorable court. . . . [T]he correspondence and pleadings in this cause . . . amply demonstrate petitioner's misconception that his law training entitles him to file whatever he wants whenever he wants without the slightest regard for the law or judicial resources ." ...

Not one to suffer defeat lightly, appellant untimely moved the Court of Appeal to review its order granting the nominal $100 fee award. For the first time, as appellant acknowledges, see Juris. Statement 2, he claimed that the award of sanctions was in retaliation for certain correspondence he had sent to the Court of Appeal complaining about the " denial" of appellate review of his conviction, in violation of his First Amendment right to petition for redress of grievances. He contended that the fee statute was therefore "repugnant to the Constitution and laws of the United States ...

Appellant now claims that he "is the victim of a state court system which, confronted by a critical and recalcitrant defendant, decided to punish him for attempting to assert his right to a day in court on an appeal from a conviction in a presumably routine traffic case." ...

This curious sequence suggests the dangers of a system of legal education that trains students in technique without instilling a sense of professional responsibility and ethics-a bit like giving a small boy a loaded pistol without instruction as to when and how it is to be used. Had he thus conducted himself after finishing law school and before being admitted to practice the State would plainly have been entitled to conclude that he was unfit to be a member of the Bar ...
Yes, you too can take a simple speeding ticket all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Last edited by Mensa130; 04-04-2013 at 12:48 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-04-2013, 10:39 AM
Status: "I am Blessed." (set 7 days ago)
 
Location: Spurs country. "Go, Spurs, Go!"
3,411 posts, read 3,968,861 times
Reputation: 8810
And that BS is exactly why our courts are overcrowded and backed up! I didn't read the link, just your your last line, so I am basing my rant on that. A SPEEDING TICKET all the way to the Supreme Court???? Well, if a convict can sue over ridiculously stupid matters (not having peanut butter comes to mind), then I cannot fault a free citizen for taking advantage of the system, although I do not agree with it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > True Crime
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top