Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > True Crime
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-09-2016, 10:12 AM
 
13,992 posts, read 14,948,723 times
Reputation: 10440

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA101 View Post
While this is true, the overall crime rate has dropped under De Blasio.

I don't like the mayor, but have to give credit where due. It's the safest big city in the country, and getting safer by the year.
If you think about it NYC just has a diluted murder rate, 43% of the MSA 35% of the NYC CSA live in NYC, if you took the inner 35% of most metro areas the murder rate would be really low.
For example if Providence (170,000 out of 1.6 mil) annexed the rest of Providence County (so total of 640,000) and only add a few murders, so the murder rate would plummet.
Ditto with Hartford being 10% of its MSA.
NYC is pretty close to its metro average because it makes up so much of its average. As opposed to Hartford which is a tiny portion of its metro so one bad neighborhood has a huge effect.

 
Old 04-09-2016, 10:16 AM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
46,009 posts, read 53,355,519 times
Reputation: 15179
New England metros have a below average murder rate. NYC would still be a bit lower than average for large MSAs

https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/uc...#disablemobile
 
Old 04-09-2016, 12:40 PM
 
401 posts, read 550,125 times
Reputation: 130
Quote:
Originally Posted by BPt111 View Post
NYC has scary numbers back then

NYC had 2,245 murders in 1990 about 43 a week, 6 a day

102,000 robberies = 1,961 robberies a week, 280 a day

NYC probably 7,000 shooting victims back then, 583 a month, 83 a day
I can see why my parents moved out of NYC lol.
 
Old 04-09-2016, 01:00 PM
 
10,275 posts, read 10,301,997 times
Reputation: 10644
Quote:
Originally Posted by btownboss4 View Post
If you think about it NYC just has a diluted murder rate, 43% of the MSA 35% of the NYC CSA live in NYC, if you took the inner 35% of most metro areas the murder rate would be really low.
But that isn't the murder rate for NYC. Why would I calculate the murder rate that way, by randomly including suburbs, to meet some predetermined proportion of metro-area population?

The murder rate of NYC is extremely low, and lower than that of basically any major U.S. city. That has nothing to do with the city being "too big", in fact if NYC were smaller, it would have an even lower murder rate, since Manhattan and environs have a lower murder rate than the outer portions of the city (Manhattan didn't have it's first murder in 2016 until a few weeks ago).
 
Old 04-09-2016, 01:36 PM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
46,009 posts, read 53,355,519 times
Reputation: 15179
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA101 View Post
But that isn't the murder rate for NYC. Why would I calculate the murder rate that way, by randomly including suburbs, to meet some predetermined proportion of metro-area population?
the suburbs aren't random; they're part of the metro. City limits very greatly by region.

Take a look at the link I posted. Some metros have violent crime concentrated in the city proper, others don't. Boston MSA had a murder rate of 2.1 in 2012; while the Seattle MSA had 2.9 per 100k. But by city, Boston is much higher.

In comparison, the New York City MSA had a murder rate of 3.8 per 100k, Chicago 7.1 per 100k
 
Old 04-09-2016, 04:47 PM
 
6,438 posts, read 11,962,652 times
Reputation: 5154
Quote:
Originally Posted by nei View Post
the suburbs aren't random; they're part of the metro. City limits very greatly by region.

Take a look at the link I posted. Some metros have violent crime concentrated in the city proper, others don't. Boston MSA had a murder rate of 2.1 in 2012; while the Seattle MSA had 2.9 per 100k. But by city, Boston is much higher.

In comparison, the New York City MSA had a murder rate of 3.8 per 100k, Chicago 7.1 per 100k
I think the rate of Atlanta's MSA is low too, but slightly higher than the national average. What puts Atlanta proper at a disadvantage is the low city population, about 420,000 and less than 10% of the MSA, but most of the murders in the metro occur within the Atlanta proper, and mostly concentrated is certain neighborhoods (mainly SW Atlanta).
 
Old 04-10-2016, 09:05 AM
 
Location: North Raleigh x North Sacramento
5,797 posts, read 5,588,432 times
Reputation: 7081
Richmond recorded its 20th killing of 2016 with a 3 am shooting near the State Capital building downtown...

Richmond had 39 murders all of 2015, has averaged 39 for the decade, and on 4/10/16 is already over half of that...
 
Old 04-10-2016, 09:24 PM
 
Location: Maine
1,285 posts, read 1,390,031 times
Reputation: 1008
Super Bowl Winner Will Smith Shot, Killed in New Orleans; Suspect Arrested - ABC News
 
Old 04-10-2016, 09:48 PM
 
448 posts, read 589,626 times
Reputation: 257
I was just about to post about that Ex Saints player shot in New Orleans. That's such a dangerous city.

Albuquerque has had 5 murders in the past week. However I have no idea where it's at for the year.
 
Old 04-11-2016, 07:16 AM
 
10,275 posts, read 10,301,997 times
Reputation: 10644
Quote:
Originally Posted by nei View Post
the suburbs aren't random; they're part of the metro. City limits very greatly by region.
We aren't talking about metro area populations. The previous poster wanted to calculate the crime rate for NYC by including suburbs, up to some predetermined % of overall metro area. That makes no sense.

Calculate city-to-city or metro-to-metro but not using some random determination of what "should" constitute the regional share of city limits population.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > True Crime

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top