 |
|
|

12-05-2010, 09:46 AM
|
|
|
|
Location: If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space
12,232 posts, read 3,787,194 times
Reputation: 52014
|
|
|
It's so mean but I sorta like Jaxson's FB campaign idea
I like Grandpa's idea, too! The one voted off first isn't always the worst - even this year it seems to me The Hoff would have improved more than The Situation did. We might be surprised! I also wouldn't mind seeing a season with a bunch of 2nd and 3rd placed dancers.
|
|

12-08-2010, 08:15 AM
|
|
|
|
Location: Taxachusetts
9,444 posts, read 4,300,903 times
Reputation: 7133
|
|
So they really were going to have a same sex couple? How gross. There's nothing wrong with two females dancing together, fast dancing, but close ballroom? Yuck. My God, I'm a little slow on the uptake....I just realized that tv is the biggest enabler of perverse behavior. DUH. 
|
|

12-11-2010, 08:04 AM
|
|
|
|
11,355 posts, read 14,087,378 times
Reputation: 11533
|
|
|
Portia de Rossi declined.
I would like to see Judge Judy! HAHA
|
|

12-11-2010, 08:16 AM
|
|
Status:
"Hello!"
(set 28 days ago)
|
|
Location: Sudcaroland
7,868 posts, read 2,716,791 times
Reputation: 27388
|
|
|
If she had said yes, it would have been ridiculous to have Portia dance with another woman. Because she's gay, she shouldn't dance with a guy? How silly.
|
|

12-11-2010, 08:28 AM
|
|
Status:
"Retired and contented.."
(set 2 days ago)
|
|
Location: Arizona
21,670 posts, read 12,196,363 times
Reputation: 59487
|
|
|
If that's the direction the DWTS show is going, they've lost at least 5 viewers that I know.
|
|

12-12-2010, 12:44 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: The other side of the Cumberland Plateau
357 posts, read 292,752 times
Reputation: 501
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nitram
If that's the direction the DWTS show is going, they've lost at least 5 viewers that I know.
|
I don't doubt what you say, and there's probably millions more who feel the same way, however, on the flip side, how many gay people would start watching because of a gay couple? Would it be enough to keep show on the air? Would viewers be offended? Would the advertisers be offended?
Remember, it's a ratings and money thang....as was proven last season. Controversary increases curiosity, curiosity increases ratings and ratings increases revenue.
|
|

12-12-2010, 01:02 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: somewhere between right and wrong
7,981 posts, read 3,626,308 times
Reputation: 9947
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Liondandy
I don't doubt what you say, and there's probably millions more who feel the same way, however, on the flip side, how many gay people would start watching because of a gay couple? Would it be enough to keep show on the air? Would viewers be offended? Would the advertisers be offended?
Remember, it's a ratings and money thang....as was proven last season. Controversary increases curiosity, curiosity increases ratings and ratings increases revenue.
|
I dare say someone who is gay and gay viewers no doubt don't care to be exploited just so a network and it's sponsors can get rich.
This show is done. For me. Good idea in the beginning--the teach someone who can't dance to dance. But it went off track early on and has stayed that course.
|
|

12-12-2010, 01:21 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: The other side of the Cumberland Plateau
357 posts, read 292,752 times
Reputation: 501
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PippySkiddles
I dare say someone who is gay and gay viewers no doubt don't care to be exploited just so a network and it's sponsors can get rich.
This show is done. For me. Good idea in the beginning--the teach someone who can't dance to dance. But it went off track early on and has stayed that course.
|
Oh I bet they would if they got paid enough  .
I don't think it's exploiting someone just because of their sexual preference and appearing on this show. No more than exploiting physically-challenged people by having Heather Mills on the show. If nothing more, it brought more awareness of physically-challenged people.
I do agree that DWTS has gotten off track in recent years by some of the so-called stars they've selected. It premise of the show has really changed and I truly doubt I'll be watching this season.
|
|

12-12-2010, 01:36 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: somewhere between right and wrong
7,981 posts, read 3,626,308 times
Reputation: 9947
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Liondandy
Oh I bet they would if they got paid enough  .
I don't think it's exploiting someone just because of their sexual preference and appearing on this show. No more than exploiting physically-challenged people by having Heather Mills on the show. If nothing more, it brought more awareness of physically-challenged people.
I do agree that DWTS has gotten off track in recent years by some of the so-called stars they've selected. It premise of the show has really changed and I truly doubt I'll be watching this season.
|
you apparently don't know many gays. I think Heather Mills was exploited as well but she would sell her soul to the devil.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|
Similar Threads
-
Dancing with the Stars - Fall 2011, TV, 1203 replies
-
dancing with the stars dancers, TV, 11 replies
-
Dancing with the stars is unfair something not right, TV, 19 replies
-
Dancing with the Stars - Season 8, TV, 323 replies
-
Dancing with the stars, TV, 3 replies
-
Dancing With The Stars..., TV, 4 replies
|