Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment > Unemployment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-20-2017, 01:15 PM
 
8 posts, read 9,896 times
Reputation: 10

Advertisements

Hello,

I received a denial for UI benefits for something called requalification. The determination states.

"Has the claimant worked and earned wages in employment or which will be reported to FICA since his denial of benefits based on section 601, 602, 303 of the Unemployment act?

The evidence shows the claimant did not earn wages that can be used for re-qualification. Since the wages earned were not for services in employment subject to FICA, the claimant has not met the re-qualification provision of section 601, 602, 603."

I am confused by what this means. Because, my job didn't deduct FICA am I ineligible for benefits? This was a temp job through an agency, if than makes a difference. Please help me understand what this means.

I did receive an Earnings for Re qualification Questionnaire that asks me to list the wages I earned after 1/29/17 which was a day before my discharge, so I only worked one day after the 29th, which was the day I was discharged and I will turn in the questionnaire with pay stubs like they asked.

So am I completely screwed? I assumed the misconduct issue would be the problem, turns out this re-qualification thing is now the issue. Does anyone have any advice or experience with any of this, I'm lost.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-20-2019, 08:11 PM
 
32 posts, read 92,434 times
Reputation: 22
How did it turn out ? Did u hey it ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2019, 08:42 PM
 
14,500 posts, read 31,069,269 times
Reputation: 2562
This was from a year ago. What are you trying to do? He isn't even in CA. His situation wasn't like yours. He was a week short of the requirements.

YOU have a good chance of getting UI if you'd just post better information, and stop using your cellphone in short bursts hoping you'll get a complete answer from short sentences thinking that people can read your mind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment > Unemployment

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top