Quote:
Originally Posted by ocpaul20
Hmm, we dont seem to be hearing from the religious folk on this one. I wonder why? Could it be that they dont want to consider anything which is not explained by or cannot be explained with reference to their belief system?
I was going to put this in the recent ghosts / Heaven/ God thread but I decided it needed a thread of its own. However, the religious folk over there are not biting on this discussion here.
|
It doesn't look like you heard from any religious folk. I am indeed religious (Christian) folk, as you can see from my posts on the Religion & Spirituality forum. However, I am also a member or former member of the (British) Society for Psychical Research, American Society for Psychical Research, Mutual UFO Network, American Association for Electronic Voice Phenomena, International Association for Near Death Studies, and other similar organizations.
I don't see any disconnect between religious belief and the paranormal/anomalous. For one thing, I have simply had too many paranormal experiences to ignore. All in all, I feel that my paranormal experiences and studies have greatly enhanced the depth of my religious beliefs. You cannot get to God before you get past the materialistic paradigm, and serious study of the paranormal certainly helps do that.
I am after The Truth, of as close to it as I can get in this lifetime. If a solid body of evidence requires me to revise my religious beliefs, so be it.
When I read the OP, I was going to make the point that I now see has been made. The term "collective unconscious" can cover a lot of territory, from Jungian psychology to Edgar Cayce and the Akashic Records and beyond. One explanation for the best mediums (Mrs. Piper, Eileen Garrett) is that they were tapping into the collective unconscious through "Super PSI" rather than contacting the dead. Super PSI really isn't an explanation at all - just a last-ditch attempt by those whose paradigm can't handle contact with the dead to explain away the best evidence.
Really extensive studies have not led me to conclude that anything like the Akashic Records is a reality. I believe consciousness is more mysterious than that. I tend to believe either that what we experience as consciousness
is God or is the fundamental "stuff" of which the universe is constructed. Before I even saw this thread, just this morning I posted the following on the Philosophy forum:
Way back in the 1930's, astrophysicist Sir James Jeans wrote: "I incline to the idealistic theory that consciousness is fundamental, and that the material universe is derivative from consciousness, not consciousness from the material universe ... In general the universe seems to me to be nearer to a great thought than to a great machine. It may well be, it seems to me, that each individual consciousness ought to be compared to a brain-cell in a universal mind."
Quantum physics and modern consciousness studies have made the subject more complex that anything Jeans probably had in mind, but I basically think he was on the right track and I don't see any inconsistency with my religious beliefs.