Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Horn News, a respected conservative news organization, is featuring a plausible Bigfoot video. Perhaps this will send more more people with better cameras into the backcountry to finally answer this question.
Looks humanoid, but with numerous misidentification and hoaxers in costumes we may never know. The legend is big though. Any hike I have taken I thought of the slim possibility of running into Biggie.
The eerie sound has been way overdone. The video, I saw that well over a year ago.
The video itself is very suspicious. There is one frame in the video at the 30 second point; you can see other footsteps in the snow. It looks as if this scene was practiced!
There are how many cameras in the world; not to mention how many cell phones that can shoot great pictures. There is no reason that nobody can get one clear picture; other than people want to perpetuate another hoax.
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,551 posts, read 81,085,957 times
Reputation: 57744
Quote:
Originally Posted by fisheye
The video itself is very suspicious. There is one frame in the video at the 30 second point; you can see other footsteps in the snow. It looks as if this scene was practiced!
There are how many cameras in the world; not to mention how many cell phones that can shoot great pictures. There is no reason that nobody can get one clear picture; other than people want to perpetuate another hoax.
Yes, that makes sense. I cannot rule out the possibility of a Bigfoot/Yeti existing, but the trail cam has been around since the early 1990s, and yet there are not many pictures of such creatures, and none are clear, while the deer, elk, owls, and wolves have good clear resolution. It's more than a little suspicious. If I had nothing better to do hunting for bigfoot would be fun, if only to be spending time out in the woods, but I wouldn't count on finding solid evidence.
Yes, that makes sense. I cannot rule out the possibility of a Bigfoot/Yeti existing, but the trail cam has been around since the early 1990s, and yet there are not many pictures of such creatures, and none are clear, while the deer, elk, owls, and wolves have good clear resolution. It's more than a little suspicious. If I had nothing better to do hunting for bigfoot would be fun, if only to be spending time out in the woods, but I wouldn't count on finding solid evidence.
We have clear trail camera pictures taken in the dead of night. BF hunters cannot capture one clear picture in the daylight!
As far as solid evidence; the groupies can't even produce an ounce of scat!
Yes, that makes sense. I cannot rule out the possibility of a Bigfoot/Yeti existing, but the trail cam has been around since the early 1990s, and yet there are not many pictures of such creatures, and none are clear, while the deer, elk, owls, and wolves have good clear resolution.<>
Obviously these BF are aliens from the other dimensions who are here on a nature hike. They do this to remind their culture not to follow the destructive path we are on. Their cloaking devices distort all electronic devices around them as a side effect of the quantum transporters that bring them, or their images, to us. "Obviously a BF does NOT 5417 in the woods."
I recall seeing a great scary documentary of sorts in 1976 in the movie theaters: Mysterious Monsters. Creepy as all get out. Campy and creepy. It's on youtube I believe..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.