Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > United Kingdom
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-17-2012, 03:33 PM
 
881 posts, read 2,092,447 times
Reputation: 599

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaggy001 View Post
But therein resides the problem. Most of these massacres have been perpetrated by people who were law abiding and outwardly sane. .
Er, no. Not even close. They are seriously mentally unstable and ill, and need constant care and supervision to avoid harm to themselves and others. Each account of such "shooters" over the past quarter century is a recitation of anti social behaviors, previous threats, and injury to others.
We've gone 180 from locking up too many for too little, to releasing those who demonstrate the need for supervised care back into the community at rates that cannot be found elsewhere in the Western world.
Do not be surprised when such horrors continue.


Quote:
I grew up in the sixties and seventies. We didn't have school shootings then
??? Seriously?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-17-2012, 03:38 PM
 
Location: London, UK
9,962 posts, read 12,380,974 times
Reputation: 3473
So the problem is how the US handles mental illness NOT gun control.
Guns + mental illness = acidents
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-17-2012, 04:00 PM
 
5,126 posts, read 7,409,420 times
Reputation: 8396
Quote:
Originally Posted by P London View Post
So the problem is how the US handles mental illness NOT gun control.

Guns + mental illness = accidents
The shooter lived in Connecticut, which has some of the strictest gun control laws in the U.S.

It has now come out that he tried to buy a gun on his own THREE TIMES, and was refused because he didn't want to submit to the waiting period or the background check. That IS gun control in action.

He resorted to using his mother's guns. No idea if they were locked up, but Connecticut may even have laws about that. His mother had legal permits.

I think his mom made a huge miscalculation in allowing guns around her unstable son and teaching him how to use them. And he was VERY unstable. He was assigned his own psychologist in school, and even that wasn't enough. His mother took him out to home school him because she thought the school wasn't doing enough. He used to back up against the walls or walk the other way when other kids were walking toward him. He also had episodes where he was disturbed and his mom had to come to school to calm him down. The school had to watch to make sure he didn't hurt himself because he couldn't feel pain.

Recently, she confided in a friend that he was going downhill. She said she was losing him and that he had resorted to burning himself too.

Last edited by Shooting Stars; 12-17-2012 at 04:11 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-17-2012, 04:10 PM
 
14,247 posts, read 17,921,045 times
Reputation: 13807
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayess1 View Post
Er, no. Not even close. They are seriously mentally unstable and ill, and need constant care and supervision to avoid harm to themselves and others. Each account of such "shooters" over the past quarter century is a recitation of anti social behaviors, previous threats, and injury to others.
We've gone 180 from locking up too many for too little, to releasing those who demonstrate the need for supervised care back into the community at rates that cannot be found elsewhere in the Western world.
Do not be surprised when such horrors continue.


??? Seriously?
Trouble is .... we only found that out after the event.

Hindsight is 20-20

Reality is that it is far less likely to happen in the UK because people don't have access to guns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-17-2012, 04:13 PM
 
881 posts, read 2,092,447 times
Reputation: 599
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaggy001 View Post
Trouble is .... we only found that out after the event.

Hindsight is 20-20
"We" doesn't matter. What does matter (and again, going off of reports) is that he had been under care and had been reported previously, and that, as currently constituted, could not be put under more rigorous care.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-17-2012, 04:16 PM
 
5,126 posts, read 7,409,420 times
Reputation: 8396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayess1 View Post
Er, no. Not even close. They are seriously mentally unstable and ill, and need constant care and supervision to avoid harm to themselves and others. Each account of such "shooters" over the past quarter century is a recitation of anti social behaviors, previous threats, and injury to others.

We've gone 180 from locking up too many for too little, to releasing those who demonstrate the need for supervised care back into the community at rates that cannot be found elsewhere in the Western world.

Do not be surprised when such horrors continue.
Word! I have never seen an account of a shooter that didn't turn up psychological issues and warning behavior.

This is the source of our homeless problem too in big cities. Many of them are mentally ill or addicted, but can't be confined.

The shooter came from a family that was financially well off. Reportedly, the mother was getting help for him. But the laws make it difficult to put someone in an institution, no matter how badly they need to be there for their own protection and ours.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayess1 View Post
??? Seriously?
Yes. Hardly any homeless people either back then.

Not enough people stop to ask what happened between earlier decades when this stuff was unheard of, and now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-17-2012, 04:26 PM
 
Location: near bears but at least no snakes
26,653 posts, read 28,677,767 times
Reputation: 50525
As for limiting gun access - will never happen in the US. Fundamentally, the UK and the US are completely different.

It will happen. There will be tightening of the federal laws somewhat. My state of Massachusetts, like neighboring Connecticut, already has strong anti-gun laws. The rest of the states may not ever get as strict as we are but they will change.
So if we tighten up on the guns, do something to provide more alternatives for mental health, and tone down the amount of violence (which we tried to tone down many years ago but no one would listen....) maybe things will get better.It will be a long and complicated road but some of us in certain states are sick and tired of all this. The gun people will just have to change, along with other changes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-17-2012, 04:54 PM
 
5,126 posts, read 7,409,420 times
Reputation: 8396
The way this particular incident played out, the shooter wasn't able to buy a gun himself due to CT gun laws.

Aside from 2nd amendment issues, his mother had legal hobbies - hunting and target shooting. On what grounds could you could prevent her from owning guns? Even in countries with stricter gun control, there are licenses for such activities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-17-2012, 06:19 PM
 
Location: London, UK
54 posts, read 59,661 times
Reputation: 29
It's not rocket science. A country with so many guns lying around and so easily available is to see situations in Which people use them.

Why is this so difficult to understand?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2012, 01:09 AM
 
14,247 posts, read 17,921,045 times
Reputation: 13807
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shooting Stars View Post
The way this particular incident played out, the shooter wasn't able to buy a gun himself due to CT gun laws.

Aside from 2nd amendment issues, his mother had legal hobbies - hunting and target shooting. On what grounds could you could prevent her from owning guns? Even in countries with stricter gun control, there are licenses for such activities.
But ..... he was still able to get hold of a gun.

In the UK it would be virtually impossible for him to do that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > United Kingdom
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:47 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top