Is this a conspiracy?: BBC reporting of 9/11

[nighthouse66]

Originally Posted by lvoc

The situation on 9/11 was unique. The results were unique. So what?

The two towers were also unique and will never be rebuilt in kind because of 9/11.

Bldg 7 was minor side damage otherwise notable only for its opportunity for conspiracy theory...

The entire thing is completely and totally absurd. The necessary precursor steps to such a conspiracy are so large and complex as to defy the ability ofl modern man to have carried them off.

An appeal to the bad digestion of an exoterrestrial god form would make more sense.

Minor side damage of Building 7 would not have resulted in the building falling down, all at once, like a house of cards. It took 7 seconds. This is freefall. If the building had fallen merely by fire, it would have first of all, NOT FALLEN IN THAT WAY, and secondly, it would have bent slowly, not fallen at free fall speed.

Not only this- but there were center steel pillars on the towers. At over 2700 degrees, iron melts. These temperatures were impossible to achieve without explosives, but if you can somehow convince yourself that the fire reached that temp, which it could not, it would NOT have caused the buildings to collapse in that way. The iron would have BENT, not collapsed, and it would not have caused an all-at-once collapse.

The results were not unique. They were completely scientifically corresponding to a controlled demolition. There is literally no other explanation for this. You are trying to make me believe that thousands of people died in a fire that somehow got hot enough for concrete to pulverize, steel girders to collapse towards the center JUST as in a controlled demolition, and it is not a controlled demolition. If you want to ignore the facts, you are not alone. No one wants to accept that they were lied to about one of the greatest tragedies Americans have ever faced. It is literally too much for the heart to bear. But it is nonetheless true. Examine the facts, which you obviously have NOT done, but thousands of scientists have came to the same conclusion, after having many of the same prejudices as yourself, and no one is happy about this. But it is nonetheless true. Its like saying JUST THIS ONE TIME IN HISTORY science, physics and thermodynamics acted somehow completely at odds with what we know to be true, and IF THIS IS SO, there STILL needs to be an investigation that does not ignore all the eyewitness testimony regarding audible explosions, does not dumb down or completely ignore the science, and takes into account Building 7 because you do know, that wasn't in the report? It was never addressed by NIST?

And sweeping away something by calling it "absurd" ......yeah, it is absurd, its absurd that science is treated as something we can take or leave according to our own political agenda.