Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-07-2015, 12:41 PM
 
391 posts, read 285,387 times
Reputation: 192

Advertisements

I hear this all the time. I heard that NYC was able to build its vast network because of the huge supply of immigrants who were willing to do dangerous work and that it couldn't be built today. I'm sure there are plenty of people in this world today from poorer nations will accept that kind of work just like the poor European immigrants of that time. So why doesn't the government encourage them to come? Is because of protectionism and regulations? Who loses in this situation? If people are willing to do the work, let them do it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-07-2015, 12:46 PM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,570 posts, read 81,167,557 times
Reputation: 57798
Cheap labor today would only be a small help, but your idea would never fly due to the government worker unions and the requirements for contractors to pay prevailing wage. Another economic factor is the cost of acquiring the land, even a tunnel underground requires access on the surface, and parking for the riders. Another is the cost of litigation to fight all of the lawsuits that start the day someone proposes such a project.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2015, 02:04 PM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,478,433 times
Reputation: 15184
Underground stations often don't have parking. If there's enough land for parking, there's enough land to put the train above ground.

Most western European subway projects are much cheaper than American ones despite not having particularly cheap labor costs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2015, 02:51 PM
 
391 posts, read 285,387 times
Reputation: 192
Why are they so much cheaper in western Europe, which is also developed? Why can't the US do what they do?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2015, 08:12 PM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,570 posts, read 81,167,557 times
Reputation: 57798
Quote:
Originally Posted by sstsunami55 View Post
Why are they so much cheaper in western Europe, which is also developed? Why can't the US do what they do?
The cost of subways is not cheaper in Europe, they just have more tax money. Gas in London is $8.17/gallon, Germany $8.35. In the UK gas prices include a hydrocarbon oil duty, and value added tax. Some cities such as London include a "congestion charge". We could probably afford more transit including subways if we added another $5-6 per gallon tax to the price of gas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2015, 08:46 PM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,478,433 times
Reputation: 15184
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemlock140 View Post
The cost of subways is not cheaper in Europe, they just have more tax money.
No, that's not true. There's a rather large gap. Could look up more later.

https://pedestrianobservations.wordp...ruction-costs/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2015, 06:43 AM
 
10,222 posts, read 19,210,835 times
Reputation: 10894
Unions, environmental and safety regs (a lot more people used to die in construction), and of course corruption.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2015, 09:12 PM
 
Location: Holly Neighborhood, Austin, Texas
3,981 posts, read 6,736,067 times
Reputation: 2882
I remember an article on this a few years back:
U.S. Taxpayers Are Gouged on Mass Transit Costs - Bloomberg View

"A huge part of the problem is that agencies can’t keep their private contractors in check."

"Design should be focused on the needs of the users,” he wrote, “rather than on architectural beauty or exotic materials, and never on the name of the architect.”

"Melis praised quick execution as necessary for an efficient, affordable project. (Compare this with multigenerational projects, such as California’s high-speed rail and New York’s Second Avenue subway.)"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2015, 10:38 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,515 posts, read 33,540,106 times
Reputation: 12152
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemlock140 View Post
The cost of subways is not cheaper in Europe, they just have more tax money. Gas in London is $8.17/gallon, Germany $8.35. In the UK gas prices include a hydrocarbon oil duty, and value added tax. Some cities such as London include a "congestion charge". We could probably afford more transit including subways if we added another $5-6 per gallon tax to the price of gas.
There would be riots in the streets before that ever happens.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2015, 11:35 PM
 
2,359 posts, read 1,034,556 times
Reputation: 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by sstsunami55 View Post

I hear this all the time. I heard that NYC was able to build its vast network because of the huge supply of immigrants who were willing to do dangerous work and that it couldn't be built today. I'm sure there are plenty of people in this world today from poorer nations will accept that kind of work just like the poor European immigrants of that time. So why doesn't the government encourage them to come? Is because of protectionism and regulations? Who loses in this situation? If people are willing to do the work, let them do it.
The reason the government doesn't encourage immigrant labor to come and build a subway in New York is pretty simple: New York already has a subway. It doesn't need to be built now, because it already exists. It was built a long time ago.

If you're wondering why the government doesn't encourage immigrant labor to descend on Valdosta, GA, to build a subway there, the answer is similarly straightforward: Valdosta doesn't need a subway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:33 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top