U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-05-2011, 04:06 PM
 
Location: Planet Eaarth
8,955 posts, read 17,769,247 times
Reputation: 7193

Advertisements

Do we really need all the freeway space that was so popular in the recent past?

Cities are re-thinking that point and some have come to the conclusion......maybe not.
" In fact, the dirty secret of freeways is that they don’t reduce traffic, they create it. Ask any urban planner: Give people more roads, and more of them will drive. "

Are freeways doomed? - Dream City - Salon.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-05-2011, 04:18 PM
 
Location: bend oregon
932 posts, read 850,755 times
Reputation: 351
i dont think theres any way around it, unless you had good transit
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2011, 04:32 PM
 
Location: Michigan
4,571 posts, read 7,064,190 times
Reputation: 3600
Quote:
Originally Posted by drum bro View Post
i dont think theres any way around it, unless you had good transit
Most definitely.

Another thing is that there are some freeways that are redundantly place and some that are useful for connecting areas far apart. But I'd bet most cities have redundant routes. There can't be too many positives for having freeways parallel each other in the same direction.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2011, 07:10 PM
 
Location: North Baltimore ----> Seattle
6,473 posts, read 11,141,619 times
Reputation: 3118
Freeways have come down. The Embarcadero is a good example of that. The West Side Highway, as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2011, 07:24 PM
 
Location: The City
22,350 posts, read 32,299,079 times
Reputation: 7754
In the 50s and 60s Spring Garden street was identified as part of an inner loop freeway system, these are the new plans today

How Green Is Your (Spring) Garden (Street)? | Hidden City Philadelphia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2011, 10:02 PM
 
Location: Thunder Bay, ON
2,610 posts, read 3,777,902 times
Reputation: 1616
There's been a lot discussion about the Gardiner Expressway, which is the only highway into downtown Toronto. Some want to bury it or get rid of it entirely (especially since it's getting old) since they feel it blocks off the city from the waterfront. However, if it does act as a barrier to the waterfront, it's more psychological than physical, because at least within downtown, it's elevated.

Others have accepted that the Gardiner is there to stay and are looking at ways of beautifying it. I think the Gardiner is not that much of a barrier as this point. I think Lakeshore Boulevard, a high speed arterial which often has two pairs of crossing lights (one to the median, to the other side of the road) is the real barrier with the railway underpass being just as much of a barrier as the Gardiner.

Since the Gardiner/Don Valley Parkway goes through the downtown waterfront, you could argue that it could be terminated at either end of downtown with any crosstown traffic being redirected to highway 401. I'm not sure about that though, I think I might prefer having all those cars elevated more or less out of sight than dumped onto city streets.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2011, 12:06 PM
 
Location: South Park, San Diego
4,982 posts, read 7,649,855 times
Reputation: 9337
Quote:
Originally Posted by HandsUpThumbsDown View Post
Freeways have come down. The Embarcadero is a good example of that. The West Side Highway, as well.
The Alaskan Way Viaduct in Seattle- Buh bye, and good riddance when its completed (the removal of it)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2011, 12:21 PM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Long Island / NYC
45,993 posts, read 42,229,255 times
Reputation: 14811
Quote:
Originally Posted by T. Damon View Post
The Alaskan Way Viaduct in Seattle- Buh bye, and good riddance when its completed (the removal of it)
Yea. That really didn't belong in the downtown. Killed the waterfront in some ways.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2011, 06:56 AM
 
Location: Vancouver, Canada
1,255 posts, read 2,123,995 times
Reputation: 787
Both with Toronto and Seattle it seems that city planners weren't aware of the value of waterfront.

It's peculiar to put a great big elevated highway in what should be the desirable, showcase part of the city. Seattle's waterfront looks a lot worse-off for it compared with Vancouver, despite having scenery that's just as good in total and a comparatively larger stalk of historic buildings downtown. Seattle should be prettier than it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2011, 07:14 AM
 
Location: North Baltimore ----> Seattle
6,473 posts, read 11,141,619 times
Reputation: 3118
Quote:
Originally Posted by CairoCanadian View Post
Both with Toronto and Seattle it seems that city planners weren't aware of the value of waterfront.

It's peculiar to put a great big elevated highway in what should be the desirable, showcase part of the city. Seattle's waterfront looks a lot worse-off for it compared with Vancouver, despite having scenery that's just as good in total and a comparatively larger stalk of historic buildings downtown. Seattle should be prettier than it is.
When the viaduct was constructed Seattle's downtown was a working seaport. Not exactly glamorous. now the port is further south.

Even with the Viaduct in place Seattle did provide great access to the waterfront via walkways. Yeah, the highway seemed out of place and its removal will be an improvement, but I didn't find the viaduct too intrusive when I lived in DT Seattle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top