Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-18-2013, 11:17 PM
 
7,237 posts, read 12,688,085 times
Reputation: 5657

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Retroit View Post
I've noticed that a lot of the traffic lights are timed at about 10mph over the speed limit. I suspect that this is an attempt to get people to speed up in order to give them speeding tickets. Watch out!
Gratiot in the city is exactly that way.

During the morning commute, you will never stop at a red light from 8 Mile from downtown going 45 MPH.

Of course, the Detroit Police Department certainly aren't wasting their time and energey handing out speeding tickets now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-18-2013, 11:20 PM
 
7,237 posts, read 12,688,085 times
Reputation: 5657
Quote:
Originally Posted by animatedmartian View Post
In metro Detroit, roads with high volumes and high capacities typically have longer greens. The infamous 8 Mile road is a route I use pretty much every day. Going 45, there's only 2 reds that I stop at along a 10 mile stretch. 9 Mile on the other hand, is a more narrow road and pretty much has a red on every mile within the same distance.

The light all over the metro are timed like clock-work. Except in some suburbs, they've put in new lights and it seriously disrupts the timing. I don't like the new lights.
The secondary streets in Detroit proper are quite annoying though.

For example, it's not uncommon to drive down 7 Mile and stop at several stoplights back to back, some of which don't even need to be in commission any more (there are absoutely cross traffic benefitting from the right away).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2013, 09:30 AM
 
Location: Fishers, IN
4,966 posts, read 6,228,163 times
Reputation: 4930
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnsonkk View Post
Why don't more urban areas with a high volume of commuter traffic work harder to adjust and synch up the timing of the stoplights to improve the flow of traffic?

I live in Northern Virginia and in old town Alexandria, the stoplights on US Hwy 1 are so well synched and timed that once you go through the first red light off the I-495 beltway, you smooth sail all the way into Crystal City, passing a least two dozen other stoplights that are all sequenced to turn after the current herd of vehicles passes through. The perception/illusion (or reality!) is that traffic flows so smoothly through that whole area. I have no idea what the wait times are for those trying to get onto Hwy 1 or in the rest of old town Alexandria but Hwy 1 is a dream.

Now, almost every other area of the city has bottlenecks that clearly seem the result of mis-timed lights or lack of traffic engineering. With such an impact to many daily lives of commuters (and voters), why isn't more effort put into increasing traffic flow on what appears an easy fix by adjusting the timing of the lights?
In Fort Wayne, Indiana, where I lived for a while, the lights along both Washington Blvd and Jefferson Blvd through downtown were timed perfectly that once you got the green light at the first signal, you could drive 30 mph and each successive light would change green just before you got to it. The best part was as a pedestrian, it really broke up the flow of traffic as well, as you'd have a block of 20 or so vehicles go by, and then nothing for a minute or two, then another block of vehicles, then nothing again. Granted, both of those roads were one way parallel roads going in opposite directions a block apart so that may have made it easier to time up.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Troubleshooter View Post

- The word "parkway" has a varying definition depending on what state it is in. Originally in New York, a parkway was a freeway with truck and bus traffic prohibited. In New Jersey and Kentucky, a parkway was a toll version of a freeway. But the tolls were removed from most of the Kentucky parkways after their bonds were paid off. In Indiana, a parkway is a road following a park or a river. And sometimes parkway is just the given name of the road.
Not necessarily. Much of the time, this is true, but for example, Carmel, Indiana has Keystone Parkway, a major limited access thoroughfare, that doesn't go near any parks and is at least 2 miles from the nearest river. I think sometimes it's just used because Parkway sounds more upscale. I feel the same way with Boulevard as I've seen that used in quiet subdivisions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2013, 11:20 AM
 
1,089 posts, read 873,756 times
Reputation: 782
I have driven on all of those. Yes, Keystone parkway was chosen just to give it a name, unlike Fall Creek Parkway, White River Parkway, and Pleasant Run Parkway (in Indianapolis).

The Madison Avenue Expressway (Indianapolis) is an example of a divided road with traffic signals and grade separations. It has one interchange. Raymond Street and Binford Boulevard are also examples of expressways (as defined by the US DOT).

In Evansville IN, the Lloyd Expressway is being converted to a freeway, but still retains the expressway name.

Last edited by Troubleshooter; 02-19-2013 at 11:30 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2013, 12:01 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
10,084 posts, read 15,766,317 times
Reputation: 4049
Los Angeles officially has 100 percent of its traffic lights synchronized:


100% Signal Synchronization - YouTube
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2013, 12:01 PM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
46,011 posts, read 53,160,760 times
Reputation: 15174
@Troubleshooter

As I said earlier, I'm used to the word "expressway" meaning something rather different than your use.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2013, 09:40 PM
 
497 posts, read 549,620 times
Reputation: 704
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnsonkk View Post
I live in Northern Virginia and in old town Alexandria, the stoplights on US Hwy 1 are so well synched and timed that once you go through the first red light off the I-495 beltway, you smooth sail all the way into Crystal City, passing a least two dozen other stoplights that are all sequenced to turn after the current herd of vehicles passes through. The perception/illusion (or reality!) is that traffic flows so smoothly through that whole area. I have no idea what the wait times are for those trying to get onto Hwy 1 or in the rest of old town Alexandria but Hwy 1 is a dream.
I'm curious what the drive time is going the opposite direction of travel. It doesn't appear Hwy 1 is capable of good 2-way progression due to the close proximity of traffic signals (at least between the non-couplet section from Vernon St to Airport Access Road).

If you're the unfortunately sole driving in the uncoordinated direction of travel the "dream drive" turns into a nightmare.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2013, 09:03 PM
 
497 posts, read 549,620 times
Reputation: 704
To expand on the concept of 2-way progression...

The chart below lists the theoretical cycle lengths that achieve 2-way signal progression for different speed limits and signal spacings. As the distance between traffic signals gets closer together it becomes increasingly difficult to achieve good 2-way progression.

Cycle values highlighted "orange" indicates the theoretical cycle is too short in most real-world conditions (pedestrian intervals don't fit, time wasted due to safety yellow & all red minimums). Values highlighted "green" indicates the theoretical cycle is long enough to fit most real-world conditions (even long pedestrian crossings fit into the cycle, the safety yellow & all red is only a small percentage of the total cycle).



Signals spaced 1/4 mile apart is impractical to get good 2-way progression (much of the chart highlighted orange).
Signals spaced 1 mile apart can achieve good 2-way progression (much of the chart highlighted green)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2013, 08:06 PM
 
Location: Tennessee
550 posts, read 1,277,038 times
Reputation: 676
Any data on how roundabouts could help?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2013, 05:55 PM
 
12,999 posts, read 18,796,911 times
Reputation: 9236
Quote:
Originally Posted by EVAunit1981 View Post
Any data on how roundabouts could help?
Here is some information. Of course a lot of it is unintelligible if you are not a civil engineer, but skip over that.Roundabouts: An Informational Guide - FHWA-RD-00-068
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top