Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-16-2013, 06:59 AM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,747,599 times
Reputation: 35920

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geologic View Post
That's one way to look at it.
Another way, is to consider what a successful Transit station can do to property values - it can double or triple them, raising more taxes for the city. Would it be right to pass back some of those revenues to subsidise the mass transit system?

This is most important at the Capital Expenditures stage. Once a rail system is built, it may require less maintenance expenditure (per person moved) than a highway.

Just saying... these are things that should be part of the analysis.
Just wanted to say, I. . . don't. . . think. . . so!

 
Old 02-16-2013, 08:02 AM
 
Location: Hong Kong
1,329 posts, read 1,103,804 times
Reputation: 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
Just wanted to say, I. . . don't. . . think. . . so!
??
You don't think a success transit station can double or triple property values?
Of course it can... and has, in cities where I have lived.
But there are many "issues" that need addressing for that to be possible.
 
Old 02-16-2013, 08:13 AM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,747,599 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geologic View Post
??
You don't think a success transit station can double or triple property values?
Of course it can... and has, in cities where I have lived.
But there are many "issues" that need addressing for that to be possible.
No, I do not think a transti station nearby, no matter how successful, can double or triple property values. Perhaps you'd like to give a couple of examples.
 
Old 02-16-2013, 08:44 AM
 
Location: NYC
7,301 posts, read 13,514,699 times
Reputation: 3714
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
Just wanted to say, I. . . don't. . . think. . . so!
It does happen but it is the exception, not the rule. Generally existing residential property within 1/4-3/4 mile of a station does see a substantial increase, so long as we're talking about a well used, frequent transit like. If I remember correctly from my research, residential properties that are very close to the train station also are likely to increase in value, but sometimes not at as high a rate (perhaps due to an annoyance factor). Commercial property near a new station skyrockets.
 
Old 02-16-2013, 08:49 AM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,747,599 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by HandsUpThumbsDown View Post
It does happen but it is the exception, not the rule. Generally existing residential property within 1/4-3/4 mile of a station does see a substantial increase, so long as we're talking about a well used, frequent transit like. If I remember correctly from my research, residential properties that are very close to the train station also are likely to increase in value, but sometimes not at as high a rate (perhaps due to an annoyance factor). Commercial property near a new station skyrockets.
I don't doubt these properties may increase in value d/t being close to a transit station; I'm disputing the 2-3 fold increase. A 200,000 home doesn't suddenly become worth 400,000-600,000. Commercial property I can understand.
 
Old 02-16-2013, 08:51 AM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,478,433 times
Reputation: 15184
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
I don't doubt these properties may increase in value d/t being close to a transit station; I'm disputing the 2-3 fold increase. A 200,000 home doesn't suddenly become worth 400,000-600,000. Commercial property I can understand.
I found a number of examples between 20-40%, there's probably a higher example somewhere dunno if it would be as high as 2x, especially if we're excluding commercial property.
 
Old 02-16-2013, 08:58 AM
 
Location: NYC
7,301 posts, read 13,514,699 times
Reputation: 3714
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
I don't doubt these properties may increase in value d/t being close to a transit station; I'm disputing the 2-3 fold increase. A 200,000 home doesn't suddenly become worth 400,000-600,000. Commercial property I can understand.
Yeah. The 2 and 3 fold increases ive seen occur in undervalued neighborhoods that suddenly attract more attention due to the addition of the transit.

It's gotta be good service though.
 
Old 02-16-2013, 09:00 AM
 
Location: NYC
7,301 posts, read 13,514,699 times
Reputation: 3714
Quote:
Originally Posted by nei View Post
I found a number of examples between 20-40%, there's probably a higher example somewhere dunno if it would be as high as 2x, especially if we're excluding commercial property.
Jeez, I would love a 20-40% increase in my pv.
 
Old 02-16-2013, 09:01 AM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,478,433 times
Reputation: 15184
Quote:
Originally Posted by HandsUpThumbsDown View Post
Yeah. The 2 and 3 fold increases ive seen occur in undervalued neighborhoods that suddenly attract more attention due to the addition of the transit.
Care to list examples? I'm curious. Though it sounds like transit was one of many factors, perhaps the initial boost.
 
Old 02-16-2013, 09:03 AM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,478,433 times
Reputation: 15184
Quote:
Originally Posted by HandsUpThumbsDown View Post
Jeez, I would love a 20-40% increase in my pv.
Personally, look at prices, in my self-interest, I'd like property values to go down 20-40%. Judging by the recession, seems like that would be unpleasant.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:56 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top