Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-28-2013, 12:02 PM
 
991 posts, read 1,110,136 times
Reputation: 843

Advertisements

Cincinnati
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-28-2013, 04:17 PM
 
Location: South Park, San Diego
6,109 posts, read 10,895,809 times
Reputation: 12476
Quote:
Originally Posted by abqpsychlist View Post
I've found that a lot of old, small towns seem to be more 'urban' in form than many larger, newer cities and towns:

Jackson, WY

Aztec, NM

Durango, CO

Moab, UT
It just goes to show how important the built environment is to evoke a feeling of urbanity. Build it right on the street, keep the corners solid, build it right through a few blocks on both sides, keep the street width in proportion to the building heights and even a village of 2-3 story buildings has the potential to feel dense and vibrant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2013, 07:05 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,747,599 times
Reputation: 35920
^^Most of these mountain towns are built in a narrow valley and have nowhere to expand. 2 miles out and you're sometimes in a national forest. Everything has to be trucked in from Denver, Salt Lake City, maybe Albuquerque to the cities mentioned and that happens maybe twice a week. This is not the "urban" living so many on this board desire.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2013, 07:12 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
5,003 posts, read 5,981,943 times
Reputation: 4323
Quote:
Originally Posted by orzo View Post
San Diego - Now, I'm not saying San Diego is really urban, but I feel people often view it as similar to Phoenix or other super-sprawly sunbelt cities
My experience is the opposite. Because it was one of the first US cities with modern light rail and because its downtown did develop a lot in the 90's and 00's, it's often pointed to as an example of modern, urban cities. It's not bad, but to me it's overrated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2013, 10:00 PM
 
Location: Planet Earth
3,921 posts, read 9,129,113 times
Reputation: 1673
Quote:
Originally Posted by abqpsychlist View Post
I've found that a lot of old, small towns seem to be more 'urban' in form than many larger, newer cities and towns:

Jackson, WY

Aztec, NM

Durango, CO

Moab, UT
On a side note, aside from Moab, all of those towns have established some sort of local bus service (I think all of them have done it after 2000).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2013, 11:33 PM
 
1,108 posts, read 2,286,999 times
Reputation: 694
Quote:
Originally Posted by nei View Post
It really isn't any denser than Sunbelt cities. It's a bit more cohesive, with the dense neighborhoods all right near downtown and built in a more pedestrian friendly way.
But the NW and SW quadrants are downtown and the adjacent denser neighborhoods. These areas combined are far denser, more cohesive and walkable, and more urban-feeling than Sunbelt cities.

You've got a large chunk of area that looks like this:

https://maps.google.com/maps?q=bars&...313.45,,0,4.75

https://maps.google.com/maps?q=bars&...12,291,,0,1.55

No sunbelt city, even the huge ones like Houston or Dallas, have anything close to that level or size of consistently walkable, urban-feeling swaths (I'm talking about NW and SW combined, which flow into each other seamlessly)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2013, 06:39 AM
 
Location: Portsmouth, VA
6,509 posts, read 8,453,043 times
Reputation: 3822
Quote:
Originally Posted by orzo View Post
What cities have you found are typically under-estimated in terms of urbanity? Places that people here on city data and generally tend to not give enough credit to, in terms of how urban they are.

I've got two to start:

San Diego - Now, I'm not saying San Diego is really urban, but I feel people often view it as similar to Phoenix or other super-sprawly sunbelt cities, and I think it is substantially more urban that that. Downtown, Little Italy, Hillcrest, North Park, South Park are all pretty urban and make up a large chunk of the city. Even the beach communities like Pacific Beach of Ocean Beach have walkable, urban cores. There are a lot more street-facing, pedestrian friendly retail and commercial districts than you'd expect. Don't get me wrong, it's in many ways a sprawled-out city, but it has more urban areas and urban elements that people usually give it credit for.

Baltimore - everyone knows Baltimore is urban (to be clear, "urban" in the city-data sense), but I still think it's under-estimated. It is an incredibly urban city with massive rowhouse neighborhoods and a lot of in tact dense infrastructure. Sure, there are issues with rampant poverty, disinvested neighborhoods, and sections that are unsafe or not vibrant, but overall I'd argue Baltimore is one of the most urban cities in the country, easily. It is very walkable and has a ton of great urban amenities.
Los Angeles and Hampton Roads. Northern Virginia, as people outside of the tri-state region aren't familiar with it. Northern Virginia, or NoVa, though technically a suburb of DC, is quite urban and is actually built taller than DC due to height restrictions.

LA also has the density of some areas in the Northeast part of the country, without the tall buildings, as it is becoming more of a Mid-rise city in places, High-rise in some other neighborhoods, like Hollywood, and Downtown. Atlanta is also known as a suburban place, though it is developing in neighborhoods outside of the downtown periphery like LA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2013, 12:22 PM
 
1,108 posts, read 2,286,999 times
Reputation: 694
Quote:
Originally Posted by nei View Post
It really isn't any denser than Sunbelt cities. It's a bit more cohesive, with the dense neighborhoods all right near downtown and built in a more pedestrian friendly way.
Re: Portland, I should also add that even SE and NE, while having plenty of single family homes, also have significant, urban-feeling, walkable stretches:

Much of the SE commercial area looks like this (these are all several miles from downtown):

Belmont:
bars - Google Maps

Hawthorne:
bars - Google Maps

Division:
bars - Google Maps

And then in the NE, you've got areas like this:

bars - Google Maps

bars - Google Maps

bars - Google Maps


The more I think about it, the more I strongly disagree with your comparison of Portland and Sunbelt Cities. Not only in terms of downtown and the inner neighborhoods (i.e. NW and SW) but also in terms of outer neighborhoods (SE and NE). It depends on how you define "urban" of course, but Portland overall has far more favorable urban-design elements and planning than sunbelt cities. It is a city where walking, biking, or taking transit are easy, with small blocks, narrow streets, lots of street-facing, accessible retail, phenomenal local food and drink scene, big sidewalks - many of the things that Sunbelt cities lack.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2013, 04:20 PM
 
Location: NYC
7,301 posts, read 13,514,699 times
Reputation: 3714
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
^^Most of these mountain towns are built in a narrow valley and have nowhere to expand. 2 miles out and you're sometimes in a national forest. Everything has to be trucked in from Denver, Salt Lake City, maybe Albuquerque to the cities mentioned and that happens maybe twice a week. This is not the "urban" living so many on this board desire.
? Why would that make a difference?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2013, 04:27 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,747,599 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by HandsUpThumbsDown View Post
? Why would that make a difference?
I'm not sure which point you're questioning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:32 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top