U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-08-2013, 03:34 PM
 
3,836 posts, read 4,503,430 times
Reputation: 2534

Advertisements

Even the Today Show sees the trends are unmistakable.

Urban shift has Americans bidding farewell to suburbs - Video on TODAY.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-08-2013, 03:42 PM
 
Location: West Cedar Park, Philadelphia
1,225 posts, read 2,130,693 times
Reputation: 685
Quote:
Originally Posted by Komeht View Post
Even the Today Show sees the trends are unmistakable.

Urban shift has Americans bidding farewell to suburbs - Video on TODAY.com
I've found that a lot of my peers may necessarily want to live in Manhatten, but want to live "near the action" and stay around the metro area when possible. So when they hit their late 20s or 30s they might decamp and cross the city line, but they're not really going far. I feel like its the exurbs and small towns that are suffering most. At least in Philadelphia, and this is totally anecdotal, but it seems that the metro has gotten a lot stronger and the demand to live in and around the city has stayed pretty strong. I think you can see this play out in housing prices which have continued to appreciate in and around the city. It's the further out areas that are seeing less investment, and in a sense this isn't so much a bad thing. The metro should be dense, and the rural areas should be rural.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2013, 03:48 PM
 
3,836 posts, read 4,503,430 times
Reputation: 2534
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marius Pontmercy View Post
I've found that a lot of my peers may necessarily want to live in Manhatten, but want to live "near the action" and stay around the metro area when possible. So when they hit their late 20s or 30s they might decamp and cross the city line, but they're not really going far. I feel like its the exurbs and small towns that are suffering most.
They may end up leaving the inner city at some point, but a large percentage will still crave being in well built, walkable new urbanist communities where the distances are short and the connections are many - when combined with high capacity transit will be a excellent compromise for people who crave the city but can't afford the steep cost of entry. The traditional auto dependent sprawling suburbs are dead ducks though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2013, 03:56 PM
 
Location: The City
21,892 posts, read 30,375,962 times
Reputation: 7435
Dead ducks? That is like 80% of the US population. May be changing but will take time
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2013, 04:17 PM
 
Location: North by Northwest
7,371 posts, read 9,271,461 times
Reputation: 4530
Quote:
Originally Posted by Komeht View Post
They may end up leaving the inner city at some point, but a large percentage will still crave being in well built, walkable new urbanist communities where the distances are short and the connections are many - when combined with high capacity transit will be a excellent compromise for people who crave the city but can't afford the steep cost of entry. The traditional auto dependent sprawling suburbs are dead ducks though.
The Levittowns which are now seen as lower-class/quality, sure, but the upper middle class "soulless and sprawling" communities will be fine for the foreseeable future, although their present cost premiums will probably decline somewhat. Upscale inner-city/new urbanist/old urbanist/semi-urbanist/whatever you want to call them communities are, barring massive suburban redevelopment going to be the destinations for the young/wealthy/upwardly mobile. Relatively little supply plus increased demand = high cost premium.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2013, 04:32 PM
 
9,763 posts, read 8,198,770 times
Reputation: 5676
This isn't a trend. They're just picking up on one segment of the city-suburban convection. Young adults usually want the urban life. Then they hook up and have kids. They may try to stick it out in the city, but then they realize that kids need space, and space is lots cheaper in the 'burbs. I've seen this happen a lot.

Then the kids grow up, and find the 'burbs boring. So they move into a city, and the cycle repears
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2013, 07:09 PM
 
Location: West Cedar Park, Philadelphia
1,225 posts, read 2,130,693 times
Reputation: 685
Quote:
Originally Posted by Komeht View Post
They may end up leaving the inner city at some point, but a large percentage will still crave being in well built, walkable new urbanist communities where the distances are short and the connections are many - when combined with high capacity transit will be a excellent compromise for people who crave the city but can't afford the steep cost of entry. The traditional auto dependent sprawling suburbs are dead ducks though.
That's sort of what I meant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2013, 08:33 AM
 
9,484 posts, read 10,754,635 times
Reputation: 2074
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marius Pontmercy View Post
I've found that a lot of my peers may necessarily want to live in Manhatten, but want to live "near the action" and stay around the metro area when possible. So when they hit their late 20s or 30s they might decamp and cross the city line, but they're not really going far. I feel like its the exurbs and small towns that are suffering most. At least in Philadelphia, and this is totally anecdotal, but it seems that the metro has gotten a lot stronger and the demand to live in and around the city has stayed pretty strong. I think you can see this play out in housing prices which have continued to appreciate in and around the city. It's the further out areas that are seeing less investment, and in a sense this isn't so much a bad thing. The metro should be dense, and the rural areas should be rural.
I agree with this. I know in D.C., people are choosing to either live in the city or outside the city along a metro line. Fortunately for D.C., that means they can get an urban lifestyle across the entire region living car free with premium transit if they choose. Living patterns are definitely changing across the nation.

It's not the "end" of the suburbs, but a transition - Greater Greater Washington

Last edited by MDAllstar; 08-09-2013 at 08:46 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2013, 08:43 AM
 
Location: North by Northwest
7,371 posts, read 9,271,461 times
Reputation: 4530
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDAllstar View Post
I agree with this. I know in D.C., people are choosing to either live in the city or outside the city along a metro line.

It's not the "end" of the suburbs, but a transition - Greater Greater Washington
I like this article far more than the pompous/self-righteous/wishful thinking-injected one the OP posted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2013, 11:20 AM
 
2,887 posts, read 2,914,668 times
Reputation: 1419
What central business districts and proper high density cities are seeing new swaths of population besides DC, San Fran, NY and Boston? Chicago lost population from 2000-2010. Atlanta city proper continues to grow much slower than surrounding suburbs. Houston and Charlotte's growth is impressive, but these are sprawl cities with a large population residing in SFH cul de sacs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:25 PM.

2005-2017, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top