U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-07-2014, 10:10 AM
 
Location: Long Island/NYC
11,334 posts, read 17,120,382 times
Reputation: 6075

Advertisements

No. Even in the same metro they can be different. The suburban areas within NYC are different from the suburban areas towards the outer reaches of the NYC area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-08-2014, 08:02 AM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA (Morningside)
12,448 posts, read 11,955,665 times
Reputation: 10561
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
You gave a fairly accurate description of Beaver Falls, though I disagree with a few points. The mills weren't all along the river (the Beaver in this case). There was a mill on the main street, albeit in the "lower end" which was no longer a real business district. Armstrong Cork had two facilities in town, neither on the river. B&W had a huge installation nowhere near the river. It was the main employer. In fact, only Moltrup Steel, a small family owned steel company, was located on the river.
The actual layout often varied depending upon the local topography. For example, places like Clairton and Duquense had little flat land by the river, so there wasn't any room for residential near the mills. Still, this is the stereotyped layout of a western PA mill town if it had the room to be expansive.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
The class distinctions are annoying. There wasn't much difference in pay between the steelworkers, especially the more skilled workers, and the engineers.
It depends in some cases on the vintage of the town in question. In some of the older river boroughs there is a big difference at least in terms of the housing quality you find closer to the mills versus at some remove. As commuter rail systems began to develop it became easy for the executives to live in a nearby rich borough (say Sewickley) and commute in, so later mill towns didn't show significant variation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top